30.01.2013 Views

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4<br />

simplification, particularly at low advance ratios, but attempting to include the coupled<br />

effects of all the blades would be difficult with this simple model. An iterative approach<br />

to solving the system would steadily drive the total velocity to zero as the viscous terms<br />

accumulated. For this reason, the local rotational velocity is taken as the normalization<br />

velocity <strong>for</strong> v v <strong>and</strong> as the velocity <strong>for</strong> the chord <strong>Reynolds</strong> number. This model should<br />

capture the first order viscous wake effects <strong>for</strong> the specified range of <strong>Reynolds</strong> numbers,<br />

discouraging designs with extremely high local solidity, particularly in the hub region.<br />

Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, as will be discussed in Chapter 6, this model appears to generally over-<br />

estimate the viscous swirl effect.<br />

v viscous / U∞<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

x/c aft of Trailing edge<br />

FIGURE 4.4 Average wake deficit model <strong>and</strong> INS2d data points at three <strong>Reynolds</strong> numbers.<br />

4.3.2 Gaussian Wake Viscous Swirl Model<br />

Re 1000<br />

Re 2000<br />

Re 6000<br />

The average wake deficit model neglects the effects of rotor downwash <strong>and</strong> the detail of<br />

the wake velocity distribution. That model has been modified in an attempt to account<br />

<strong>for</strong> these two factors. Based on the same INS2d data, the wake deficit velocity profile is<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!