30.01.2013 Views

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4<br />

4.3 Viscous Swirl Modeling<br />

The extreme operating conditions being considered precipitates a more detailed<br />

consideration of viscous swirl effects, where it might otherwise be neglected at higher<br />

<strong>Reynolds</strong> numbers. Typical section lift to drag ratios range from 50 to 100 at chord<br />

<strong>Reynolds</strong> numbers above 100,000, but, as shown in Chapter 3, section lift to drag ratios<br />

drop below ten in the ultra-low <strong>Reynolds</strong> number regime. In addition, the rotors<br />

developed <strong>for</strong> ultra-low <strong>Reynolds</strong> number applications typically exhibit high solidity,<br />

decreasing the separation between adjacent blades <strong>and</strong> increasing the likelihood of<br />

strong leading/trailing blade viscous wake interactions. The fact that commonly used<br />

swirl models have been implemented only on large scale, high <strong>Reynolds</strong> number rotor<br />

blades, if at all, led to the development of several alternative models that directly utilize<br />

the 2-D CFD analyses of Chapter 3. The goal is to determine both the need <strong>and</strong><br />

effectiveness of enhanced viscous swirl models.<br />

4.3.1 Average Wake Deficit Viscous Swirl Model<br />

The first viscous swirl model is based on computed airfoil wake profiles at ultra-low<br />

<strong>Reynolds</strong> numbers. Based on this data, the value of v v is taken as a predicted average<br />

wake deficit velocity. The current data is from INS2d calculations at Re 1000, 2000, <strong>and</strong><br />

6000. The section is a 2% constant thickness airfoil with a NACA 4402 camberline, a<br />

blunt leading edge, <strong>and</strong> a radiused trailing edge. The airfoil is operating at 4.0 degrees<br />

geometric angle of attack placing it close to conditions <strong>for</strong> maximum lift to drag ratio.<br />

The 2% constant thickness is representative of manufacturing minimum gage constraints<br />

<strong>and</strong> moderate variations to the camberline would have a small effect on the wake profiles<br />

compared to the much larger variations caused by <strong>Reynolds</strong> number <strong>and</strong> distance from<br />

the trailing edge. There<strong>for</strong>e, analysis of this single airfoil provides a sufficient basis <strong>for</strong><br />

this model.<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!