CONTRA LA INERCIA AGAINST INERTIA - granada cultura
CONTRA LA INERCIA AGAINST INERTIA - granada cultura
CONTRA LA INERCIA AGAINST INERTIA - granada cultura
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
148<br />
building as if it were a cow. These works are underlain<br />
by a view of life as a journey fatally linked to places or<br />
buildings that act simultaneously as objects of ambition<br />
and as existential hindrances.<br />
In El heredero (2006) [p. 119] and Heiress (2010)<br />
Paco Pomet again takes up these concepts, synthesizing<br />
a melancholy vision of the individual and the<br />
conditioning he is subjected to from the sphere of the<br />
private and familial and at a stage of life the artist<br />
returns to again and again – childhood. Both canvasses<br />
consist in the alteration of studio photographs<br />
where a boy in one and a girl in the other pose for<br />
the camera with obvious discomfort. Everything on<br />
the canvas is eloquent: the faces stare straight at us<br />
pathetically, and, following old customs not entirely<br />
forgotten, the child’s clothing attempts to make it<br />
look like an adult. The dramatic effect is produced by<br />
a sort of surgical-pictorial intervention that removes<br />
the legs from the bodies, replacing them with the legs<br />
of the furniture which, following the universal stereotype<br />
of the full-length portrait, accompanies the figure<br />
to make up the composition. The substitution trick<br />
is even more obvious when we compare the painting<br />
of the boy with the original image used by Pomet<br />
– a photograph by the Peruvian Martín Chambi (1891-<br />
1973) titled Boy with Hat (1928). The tone and haggard<br />
expression of the charmless faces and bodies<br />
Martín Chambi Jiménez: Child with Hat, 1928<br />
Martín Chambi Photographic Archive<br />
Paco Pomet: El heredero, 2006<br />
oil on canvas, 120 × 103 cm<br />
would have been sufficient to take apart like a mask<br />
the artificial, bourgeois, affected stereotype of the<br />
child portrait, but Pomet’s logic intervenes to lead the<br />
image towards the terrain of the monstrous and the<br />
grotesque. It does so with the particularity that here<br />
it does not rest at the mere surgical trick – the reification<br />
undergone by these children is also the sickly appearance,<br />
the physical expression of a life’s journey<br />
that has scarcely begun in which an above all moral<br />
and social material legacy holds them back, paralyzes<br />
them and incorporates them into the furniture of a