08.06.2013 Views

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 4<br />

Table 4 shows the latest post-censal estimates of population<br />

classified by age and sex, together with the results<br />

of censuses of population which were taken in 1945-<strong>1957</strong><br />

but which were not available in time to be included in<br />

the 1955 or 1956 Demographic Yearbook. It will be recalled<br />

that Table 10 of the 1955 Yearbook showed all<br />

census returns available at that time from enumerations<br />

carried out between 1945 and 1954. The 1956 Yearbook<br />

supplemented that comprehensive coverage with new or<br />

revised censuses and latest estimates. Table 4 in this issue<br />

continues this practice with censuses taken through <strong>1957</strong>.<br />

The census data shown are for both national and subnational<br />

segments, depending on the coverage of the respective<br />

enumerations. The estimates are assumed to be<br />

constructed on the basis of the census returns, using<br />

statistics of births, deaths, immigrants, and emigrants to<br />

adjust the base population to a current date. In general,<br />

estimates relate to the mid-year but, in a few cases, the<br />

mean population, calculated from two end-year estimates,<br />

is given. These estimates are so identified in this<br />

table.<br />

The age classification shown for censuses and estimates<br />

is based, unless otherwise indicated, on age at last birthday.l4<br />

It includes 20 categories as follows: under 1 year;<br />

1-4,5-9, continuing in 5-year groups to 84; a residual category<br />

of 85 and over; and unknown. This classification<br />

represents a slight modification of that recommended by<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> Population Commission,15 which suggested<br />

single-year tabulations from I through 4 and 5-year<br />

groups to the end of life.<br />

Unless otherwise noted, the data relate to the modified<br />

present-in-area population of geographic areas within<br />

present territorial boundaries, as described on p. 15. If<br />

the "modification" has involved large numbers of persons,<br />

a special note is also appended for clarity even<br />

though the resulting estimate is the standard for the table.<br />

Coverage: Table 4 includes one or more age-sex distributions<br />

for 61 geographic units, comprising a total of 70<br />

separate arrays, of which 28 relate to a census count and<br />

40 to postal-censal estimates.<br />

Availability was not the sole criterion used in determining<br />

the scope of Table 4. A number of available agesex<br />

distributions of population were deliberately excluded<br />

on the basis of their construction. To be included in<br />

this table, an estimate must have been constructed by<br />

the natural increase method, supplemented of course by<br />

migration statistics if available. Distributions which result<br />

when the estimated total population is distributed by<br />

age and sex according to percentages in each age-sex<br />

group at the time of the census are aot acceptable. Such<br />

distributions are on file for Bolivia, Ceuta, Colombia,<br />

Dominican Republic, Egypt, Melilla, Mexico, Philippines,<br />

Spain, and Thailand.<br />

Limitations: Comparability of population data classified by<br />

age and sex, is limited in the first place by variations in<br />

the definition of total population which has been discussed<br />

in detail on p. 15, and by the completeness of<br />

the original enumeration, also discussed above. Both<br />

of these factors are more important in relation to certain<br />

14 For a discussion of this factor, see the 1956 Demographic Yearbook,<br />

p. 26.<br />

15 Report of the Population Commission (Fourth Session), document<br />

E/1313, p. 17.<br />

22<br />

age groups than to others. For example, underenumeration<br />

is known to be more prevalent among young children<br />

than at older ages; the composition of the "total" population<br />

is primarily a function of the inclusion or exclusion<br />

of certain groups who may be of selected ages, such as<br />

members of the armed forces and so forth. Consideration<br />

should be given to the implications of these basic limitations<br />

in using the data.<br />

In addition to the defects inherent in the basic census<br />

data, estimates of population suffer also from lack of<br />

comparability in quality. To evaluate this factor, reference<br />

should be made to the "type-of-estimate" code described<br />

on p. 16. The classification of 1956 estimates by<br />

this code may be found in Table 1, and it may be assumed<br />

that the code is generally applicable to other postcensal<br />

estimates unless the post-censa1 period is excessively<br />

long.<br />

Further to these general qualifications are the special<br />

problems of comparability which arise in relation to age<br />

statistics in particular. Age-sex distributions of population<br />

are known to suffer from certain deficiencies which<br />

have their origin in underenumeration of infants and in<br />

irregularities in age reporting. A discussion of these irregularities<br />

together with a description of the procedures<br />

for testing age accuracy and the results of its application<br />

to single-year-of-age data are given on p. 17. Although<br />

some of the irregularities in the age statistics tend to be<br />

obscured or eliminated when data are tabulated in 5-year<br />

age groups, precision still continues to be affected, though<br />

the degree of distortion is not always readily seen. The<br />

classification of age distribution by Whipple's Index<br />

given in the 1955 and 1956 Demographic Yearbooks will<br />

thus continue to serve as a guide to the evaluation of<br />

age-sex accuracy in Table 4.<br />

Another limitation on comparability is found in the<br />

basis for the age classification employed by the various<br />

countries. Whenever it was known that the classification<br />

was based on other than age at last birthday, the data are<br />

so noted in the tables and allowance should be made for<br />

this factor in using the data.<br />

Deviations from the standard age classification of the<br />

ta ble are shown by bracketing and footnotes. Although<br />

precise international comparability of specific age groups<br />

is often lacking, the data are nevertheless included because<br />

of their basic value for the area concerned. This is<br />

particularly true for African areas; since statistics for<br />

these territories have not been generally available until<br />

recent years, the results of sample censuses and others<br />

employing unconventional methodology are included because<br />

of the scarcity of information for this continent.<br />

In connexion with the age classification, it should be<br />

noted that zero frequency reported in the unknown-age<br />

category is not always an indication of perfect age reporting-,<br />

but may be an indication that ages have been assigned<br />

before tabulation began. The method of age allocation<br />

!s not always known and hence it is noted infrequently<br />

III the tables, but the possibility of its having occurred<br />

should not be overlooked.<br />

Table 5<br />

Table 5 presents the latest estimate or enumeration of<br />

population in the national capital of each country irrespective<br />

of size, together with that in cities having at<br />

least 100,000 inhabitants.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!