31.05.2013 Views

Vol. 5, n. 1, January-March 2009 1th International ... - Salute per tutti

Vol. 5, n. 1, January-March 2009 1th International ... - Salute per tutti

Vol. 5, n. 1, January-March 2009 1th International ... - Salute per tutti

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Zoe Diana Draelos<br />

Clinical Dermatology Center<br />

High Point, North Carolina, USA.<br />

Evaluating acne cosmetica<br />

SU M M A R Y<br />

I ntroduction<br />

What exactly does a patient mean when she<br />

states that a certain cosmetic causes her face to<br />

“breakout”? Does this mean that she ex<strong>per</strong>iences<br />

formation of a comedone, papule, pustule, nodule,<br />

cyst, or red rash? Sometimes it is difficult to<br />

understand exactly what is meant. Also, it is<br />

hard for the patient to establish a cause and<br />

effect relationship. From a dermatologic standpoint,<br />

the term that is still used to refer to cosmetic-related<br />

acne is “acne cosmetica”.<br />

Acne cosmetica is a concept that was developed<br />

many years ago when there was concern that<br />

cosmetics could indeed cause comedone formation.<br />

The issue of comedogenicity in relation to<br />

cosmetics arose in 1972 when Kligman and<br />

Mills described a low-grade acne characterized<br />

by closed comedones on the cheeks of women<br />

ages 20 to 25. 1 Many of these women had not<br />

ex<strong>per</strong>ienced adolescent acne. The authors proposed<br />

that substances present in cosmetic products<br />

induced the formation of closed comedones<br />

and, in some cases, a papulopustular<br />

eruption. Presently, <strong>per</strong>sonal conversations with<br />

Dr. Kligman indicate that he no longer believes<br />

currently marketed cosmetics cause comedone<br />

formation, yet acne related to cosmetics<br />

remains a problem.<br />

There remain lists in the literature of ingredients<br />

that supposedly cause acne, yet it is practically<br />

impossible to find formulations that possess<br />

none of these substances. The list contains<br />

some of the most effective emollients (octyl<br />

Evaluating acne cosmetica<br />

For all purposes, acne cosmetica is a concept of the<br />

past, which the industry has done its best to re m e d y.<br />

Skin care manufacturers are keenly aware of the<br />

need to test and formulate products without skin side effects. Acne cosmetica, <strong>per</strong>h a p s ,<br />

is a term that is no longer applicable.<br />

KE Y W O R D S: Acne cosmetica, comedogenic, resonance delocalization<br />

stearate, isocetyl stearate), detergents (sodium<br />

lauryl sulfate), occlusive moisturizers (mineral<br />

oil, petrolatum, sesame oil, cocoa butter) and<br />

emulsifiers found in the cosmetic industry. 2<br />

A product line that avoided all of these substances<br />

would not <strong>per</strong>form well on the skin and<br />

would possess low cosmetic acceptability.<br />

There are many myths regarding cosmetics and<br />

cosmeceuticals and the acne that they may or<br />

may not cause. It is worthwhile examining<br />

these myths to determine where the medical<br />

truth lies.<br />

osmeceuticals do not produce acne<br />

C if labeled noncomedongenic<br />

and nonacnegenic<br />

Similar to hypoallergenic, noncomedogenic<br />

and nonacnegenic are marketing<br />

claims carrying no implied regulation. They<br />

were developed to create a new consumer<br />

image for cosmetic lines designed to minimize<br />

acne. In order to make the claim noncomedogenic,<br />

rabbit ear or human comedogenicity testing<br />

should be undertaken. Both the animal and<br />

the human model are based on the presence of<br />

new comedone formation after the exposure of<br />

skin to the finished cosmetic. Human testing is<br />

considered to be more accurate, but the results<br />

are highly dependent on the skill of the contract<br />

testing laboratory. Acnegenic claims are based<br />

Journal of Plastic Dermatology <strong>2009</strong>; 5, 1 95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!