20.02.2014 Views

Revista de Letras - Utad

Revista de Letras - Utad

Revista de Letras - Utad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

From the Bible to Cosmopolitan… 133<br />

After this brief sojourn throughout history, this paper aims to offer a<br />

preliminary exploration of the socialization of women through the study of the<br />

WOMAN AS CHICKEN metaphor in wi<strong>de</strong>ly read teenage and women’s<br />

magazines such as Cosmopolitan, Vanity Fair, Nineteen or CosmoGirl. For this<br />

purpose, the “GREAT CHAIN OF BEING” metaphor (Lakoff & Turner 1989)<br />

along with ethnobiological (Wierbizcka 1996, Martsa 1999, 2003),<br />

anthropological (Leach 1979) and cultural classifications of animals (Harris<br />

1985) will be used as a framework for the study of the metaphorical uses of<br />

chick and hen in these sort of publications. This will be followed by an analysis<br />

of a corpus of linguistic metaphors extracted from teenage and women’s<br />

magazines, which are then discussed in relation to language and socialization.<br />

II. - From the Bible to Cosmopolitan<br />

Before <strong>de</strong>aling with the metaphor un<strong>de</strong>r discussion, a preliminary note<br />

about the title of the article needs to be ma<strong>de</strong>. As the rea<strong>de</strong>r may have noticed,<br />

“From the Bible to Cosmopolitan” reflects the wi<strong>de</strong> span of time in which the<br />

WOMAN AS CHICKEN metaphor has evolved in Western culture. Yet, at the<br />

same time, it also tries to be a humorous remark about the influence of this<br />

women’s magazine in our society, especially from a feminine perspective. In<br />

fact, having been <strong>de</strong>fined as “the Bible for women” (Gauntlett 2002, Gough-<br />

Yates 2003, Machin 2005), the magazine Cosmopolitan erected as the advocate<br />

of women’s rights at the time when women, having achieved suffrage, were<br />

leaving the traditional domestic sphere and roles of mother and wife to enter the<br />

work market, gaining, therefore, personal as well as financial in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce<br />

(Gauntlett 2002). In the struggle for self-<strong>de</strong>finition, the so-called “women’s<br />

magazines” started to proliferate to cater for the needs of what was labeled as<br />

“the new woman” (Nicholas & Price 1998, Gough-Yates 2003). Woman’s Own,<br />

Vogue, Vanity Fair, Marie Claire and Cosmopolitan, among many others,<br />

helped women make sense of their collective experiences by providing mo<strong>de</strong>ls<br />

for women to follow. The pages of these publications covered a wi<strong>de</strong> selection<br />

of topics ranging from trivial issues such as make-up tricks to more serious<br />

concerns affecting women’s health through fashion articles, sexual relations,<br />

cooking, dieting, travelling, parenting or job-seeking.<br />

The circulation of these publications gradually increased and women’s<br />

magazines started to expand their rea<strong>de</strong>rship by targeting a new audience:<br />

teenagers. In fact, adolescents, who began to enjoy quite a lot of money and<br />

leisure time, provi<strong>de</strong>d a rich market for the media. Mo<strong>de</strong>led upon the versions of<br />

the more mature women’s magazines, spin-off publications such as CosmoGirl,<br />

You or Nineteen started to proliferate with a very similar goal, namely, to<br />

provi<strong>de</strong> mo<strong>de</strong>ls for teenagers to follow.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!