[Geben Sie hier die Überschrift ein] - MPC

MPC-WORKSHOP JULI 2012
simply raising the number of cores is not enough in
order to cope with performance and safety requirements.
Instead, new heterogeneous multicore systems
that provide dedicated programmable hardware units
and structures are essential. Beside that, the combination
of mixed-critical applications on single platforms
demands for certifiable architecture designs. IP-cores
and corresponding systems have to be reliable and
self-adaptive due to possible errors and malfunctions
during runtime. Still an open question is, how to combine
all available key technologies best? The development
of novel architecture patterns may help to
solve this question and will possibly be the basis for
future hardware/software co-design standards and
methodologies.
REFERENCES
[1] E. Geisberger and M. Broy, editors. agendaCPS: Integrierte
Forschungsagenda Cyber-Physical Systems. acatech Studie.
Springer, Berlin, March 2012.
[2] O. Sander, B. Glas, C. Roth, J. Becker, and K. D. Mueller-
Glaser. Cyber-physical systems, driving force for innovation
in mobility, health, energy and production. ACATECH Position
Paper, ACATECH, 2011, Dec. 2011.
[3] A. Grasset, P. Millet, P. Bonnot, S. Yehia, W. Putzke-
Roeming, F. Campi, A. Rosti, M. Huebner, N. Voros, D.
Rossi, H. Sahlbach, and R. Ernst. The morpheus heterogeneous
dynamically reconfigurable platform. International Journal
of Parallel Programming, 39:328–356, 2011.
[4] A. Thomas, M. Ruckauer, and J. Becker. Honeycomb: A
multi-grained dynamically reconfigurable runtime adaptive
hardware architecture. In SoCC, pages 335–340, 2011.
[5] J. Teich, J. Henkel, A. Herkersdorf, D. Schmitt-Landsiedel,
W. Schröder-Preikschat, and G. Snelting. Invasive computing:
An overview. In M. Hübner and J. Becker, editors, Multiprocessor
System-on-Chip – Hardware Design and Tool Integration,
pages 241–268. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,
2011.
[6] Automotive, Railway and Avionics Multicore Systems -
ARAMiS. http://www.projekt-aramis.de/index.php.
[7] O. Sander, B. Glas, C. Roth, J. Becker, and K. Müller-
Glaser. Design of a vehicle-to-vehicle communication system
on reconfigurable hardware. In Field-Programmable
Technology, 2009. FPT 2009. International Conference on,
pages 14 –21, Dec. 2009.
[8] IEEE. Trial-Use Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular
Environments (WAVE). IEEE Std 1609, 2006.
[9] SAE. Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC)
Standard Draft. SAE Standard J2735, 2006.
[10] COMeSafety Project. European ITS Communication Architecture
- Overall Framework, 2008. available at
[11]
www.comesafety.org.
O. Sander, B. Glas, C. Roth, J. Becker, and K. D. Müller-
Glaser. Priority based packet communication on a busshaped
structure for FPGA-systems. In DATE, 2009.
[12] B. Glas, O. Sander, V. Stuckert, K. D. Müller-Glaser, and J.
Becker. Car-to-car communication security on reconfigurable
hardware. In VTC2009-Spring: Proceedings of the IEEE
69th Vehicular Technology Conference, Barcelona, Spain,
2009.
[13] B. Glas, O. Sander, K. Müller-Glaser, and J. Becker. Echtzeitfähige
car-to-x-Kommunikationsabsicherung und e/e-
Architekturintegration. In ATZ Elektronik, Ausgabe 01/2012,
2012.
[14] C. Roth, O. Sander, M. Hübner, and J. Becker. Car-to-x
simulation environment for comprehensive design space exploration
verification and test. In SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars -
Electron. Electr. Syst. 3(1):17-26, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-
01-0451, 2010.
[15] A. Albers, T. Düser, O. Sander, C. Roth, and J. Henning. Xin-the-loopframework
für Fahrzeuge, Steuergeraete und
Kommunikationssysteme. In ATZ Elektronik, Ausgabe
05/2010, 2010.
[16] A. Albers, T. Düser, and S. Ott. X-in-the-loop als integrierte
Entwicklungsumgebung von komplexen Antriebssystemen.
In 8. Tagung Hardware-in-the-Loop-Simulation, Haus der
Technik, Kassel, 2008.
7