19.02.2013 Views

From: on behalf of Panel Registry Subject: FW: TNG registration of ...

From: on behalf of Panel Registry Subject: FW: TNG registration of ...

From: on behalf of Panel Registry Subject: FW: TNG registration of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 7: Research studies <strong>on</strong>going in BC <strong>on</strong> streamflow.<br />

Regi<strong>on</strong> Source Study Site Hydrologic<br />

Model<br />

Fraser Morris<strong>on</strong><br />

River et al.<br />

200234 Fraser<br />

River<br />

Basin<br />

(217,000<br />

km2) UBC<br />

Watershed<br />

Model<br />

Fraser<br />

River<br />

Sushama<br />

et al.<br />

2006 35<br />

Fraser<br />

River basin<br />

above Port<br />

Mann<br />

(232,000<br />

km 2)<br />

Canadian<br />

Regi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

Climate<br />

Model<br />

(CRCM)<br />

Source: Adapted from Merritt et al. (2006)<br />

GCM<br />

Scenario<br />

CGCMA<br />

Hadley<br />

Climate<br />

Model<br />

(HadCM2)<br />

CGCM2‐<br />

A2<br />

standard,<br />

CGCM2 –<br />

A2<br />

updated,<br />

and<br />

CGCM2‐<br />

IS92<br />

standard<br />

Downscaling<br />

Technique<br />

Statistical<br />

climate<br />

inversi<strong>on</strong><br />

CRCM<br />

(dynamical<br />

downscaling)<br />

Hydrology<br />

Scenarios<br />

Present<br />

climate:<br />

(1961‐<br />

1990)<br />

Future<br />

climate:<br />

2020<br />

(2010‐<br />

2039);<br />

2050s<br />

(2040‐<br />

2069);<br />

2080s<br />

(2070‐<br />

2099)<br />

Present<br />

climate:<br />

( 1961‐<br />

1990)<br />

Future<br />

climate:<br />

(2041‐<br />

2070)<br />

Changes to<br />

streamflow<br />

Modest average<br />

flow increase in<br />

the 2080s with a<br />

decrease in the<br />

average<br />

peak<br />

flow.<br />

General shift to<br />

earlier peak in<br />

the hydrograph<br />

(approx. 24<br />

days)<br />

A significant<br />

decrease in SWE<br />

as less<br />

precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />

falls as snow.<br />

Run<strong>of</strong>f is higher<br />

during late‐fall<br />

and early‐winter.<br />

Spring peaks are<br />

attenuated<br />

and<br />

occur earlier.<br />

Increased<br />

variability in the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> days<br />

with low‐flows.<br />

Increased low<br />

flows in fall.<br />

The recent PCIC hydrology report from 2009 outlines a host <strong>of</strong> challenges and complexities<br />

related to modeling different run<strong>of</strong>f regimes, <strong>on</strong>e being the multiple sources <strong>of</strong> streamflow<br />

that have to be accounted for (i.e. glacier‐melt and groundwater). Yet, the studies highlight<br />

that projected changes to annual and seas<strong>on</strong>al streamflow volumes and timing are similar<br />

across<br />

models and approaches. 36 The following summary is provided by the PCIC report<br />

( p.106‐108):<br />

• “All models and approaches that deal with nival (i.e. snow­fed) systems predict an<br />

earlier <strong>on</strong>set <strong>of</strong> the spring freshet or peak flows compared to the base case.<br />

34 Morris<strong>on</strong>, J., Quick, M.C. and Foreman, M.G.G., (2002).<br />

35 Sushama, L., Laprise, R., Caya,<br />

D., Frig<strong>on</strong>, A. and Slivitzky, M.,( 2006).<br />

36 Merritt, W.S. et al., (2006).<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!