24.02.2013 Views

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of the world’, Emperor Frederick II, had spent his childhood and youth in Sicily acquiring his taste<br />

for learning and freethinking in that island where Arabs and Christians had lived in harmony for<br />

two centuries. This is why he was not unduly perturbed when the pope excommunicated him; he<br />

was relatively certain that the Church is not essential to salvation - for if it is, then all those highly<br />

intelligent Muslims are damned, and that cannot be true.<br />

And now we can begin to see what an extraordinary cataclysm was about to occur. Scepticism like<br />

Frederick’s was as far as it could be from the total belief of the popes. Absurd as it sounds,<br />

Frederick’s guardian during his early years had been Pope Innocent III, one of the most fanatical of<br />

the crusading popes. He believed in his spiritual mission with a grim, humourless intensity, and<br />

took it for granted that one of his major tasks was to crush all unbelievers. He reserved his deepest<br />

loathing for a sect called the Cathars - one of those ‘purist’ reform movements that had sprung up<br />

in opposition to the obvious corruption of the Church. Cathars were not unlike the Quakers of a<br />

later century; their observances were simple, their lives rather ascetic. Like the Persian prophet<br />

Mani, they believed that everything to do with the spirit is good and everything to do with the<br />

world is evil. In which case, of course, God could never have created the world; it must be a<br />

creation of the Evil One. Jesus could not have had a physical body, and the crucifixion must have<br />

been some kind of mirage. These doctrinal differences, which strike us as harmless enough - there<br />

are a dozen modern Christian sects with far stranger views - seemed to Innocent III a guarantee of<br />

damnation. Toulouse was the centre of this heresy, and the pope excommunicated its ruler, Count<br />

Raymond. He sent inquisitors to sniff out heresy, and one of Count Raymond’s men assassinated<br />

the papal legate (or ambassador). For two days, the pope was so angry that he could not speak (a<br />

sure sign of a Right Man). When he recovered his voice, he shouted for a crusade against the<br />

heretics. This was unheard of - a crusade against Christians. The king of France refused to have<br />

anything to do with it. But dozens of knights thought it would make excellent sport - especially as it<br />

was only to last forty days. They besieged the town of Beziers and massacred its twenty thousand<br />

inhabitants, although many were not Cathars. Town after town was reduced in the same way -<br />

including Toulouse itself. The ‘crusade’ dragged on for decades, and ended with the siege of the<br />

fortress of Montsegur in 1243 and the burning alive of two hundred people who refused to<br />

renounce their faith. The Church stamped out Catharism as the Nazis tried to stamp out the Jews -<br />

by mass extermination.<br />

So it is one of the ironies of history that Innocent III should have been the guardian of the young<br />

Frederick, and no doubt direct contact with that dogmatic and narrow-minded old man convinced<br />

Frederick that the Church could not possibly be the only repository of truth. Frederick was the first<br />

sign of a new intellectual attitude; he was, in fact, the first of the ‘Renaissance men’. His attitudes<br />

and those of the pope were as far apart as fire and ice. Sooner or later, there was bound to be an<br />

enormous explosion. It is satisfactory to record that when Frederick came to power he flatly<br />

declined to burn heretics, or even to allow priests freedom from taxation and from the jurisdiction<br />

of civil courts.<br />

This particular battle ended, of course, with the death of Innocent in 1216, but continued a decade<br />

later with equally violent clashes between Frederick and Gregory IX then with his successor<br />

Innocent IV. But the real struggle was between two different currents of human evolution: religious<br />

authoritarianism and scientific enquiry. There can be no doubt that the great religions - Buddhism,<br />

Christianity, Islam - had taken mankind an immense step beyond the kind of mindless materialism<br />

that had been the downfall of Rome. But all religions begin like a mountain stream, and slowly turn<br />

into a rather muddy river. The ‘crusade’ against the Cathars was a sign of how far Christianity had

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!