24.02.2013 Views

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

complicated. It was a simple ellipse - a shape like an egg. He published his theory in a book called<br />

The New Astronomy in 1609. Astronomers read it with interest; no one else paid much attention.<br />

One of these astronomers was a brilliant but self-assertive Italian named Galileo Galilei, the<br />

professor of mathematics at Padua University. In the year Kepler’s book came out, Galileo heard<br />

about a new invention that had become fashionable in Holland. Lenses had been around for about<br />

three centuries - in fact, primitive rock-crystal lenses have been found in ancient Nineveh and<br />

Carthage. Now a Dutchman had discovered that if two lenses are put into opposite ends of a<br />

cardboard tube they will magnify distant objects. Galileo quickly made himself a telescope. Then<br />

he stepped outdoors one fine night in the autumn of 1609 and looked at the moon. What he saw<br />

amazed him. Instead of a smooth surface, he saw a landscape covered with pockmarks; closer<br />

examination showed he was looking at mountains and valleys. Then he looked at the Milky Way -<br />

which to the eye looks like white gas - and saw that it was made up of millions of stars.<br />

It was when he turned his telescope on Jupiter that he received the most exciting revelation. He saw<br />

three tiny white ‘stars’ close to the edge of the planet, and the next day, they had moved around to<br />

the other side - proving that they were not stars. Jupiter had moons, like the earth. But our moon<br />

had always been used by opponents of (Copernicus as the chief objection to his theory. If the earth<br />

went round the sun, then why should the moon go round the earth? Surely it could not be an<br />

exception to the law of nature? Now Galileo could see that our moon is not an exception - other<br />

planets have them too. In a state of great excitement, Galileo wrote a book called The Starry<br />

Messenger. It made him instantly famous, and became the seventeenth-century equivalent of a<br />

bestseller. It was like Marco Polo’s travels, a book about strange, distant regions, and everybody<br />

wanted to read it. At forty-five, Galileo suddenly found himself famous.<br />

Galileo was, in fact, a great scientist; but his discoveries had so far not been of the kind that cause<br />

widespread interest. At the age of eighteen, he had been sitting in the cathedral at Pisa when he<br />

noticed the lamp swinging back and forth from the ceiling. He timed the swings, and observed that<br />

they always took the same time. A few years later, he went to the top of the leaning tower and<br />

dropped a heavy and a light cannon ball at the same moment; he observed that they struck the<br />

ground at the same time - disproving Aristotle’s assertion that heavy objects fall faster than light<br />

ones.<br />

But as a human being, Galileo had serious shortcomings; from early on in his academic career, he<br />

displayed a crude self-assertion that gave much offence. And his sudden fame at forty-five acted as<br />

an intoxicant. The Academy of Science made him a member; at a banquet in his honour the new<br />

invention was christened ‘the telescope’. The pope, Paul V, gave him an audience. The Jesuits<br />

honoured him with ceremonies. For a man with Galileo’s thirst for fame, it must have been a heady<br />

experience. It made him more arrogant than ever. When scientific opponents raised objections to<br />

his theories, he treated it as a personal affront, and tried to crush them with sheer rudeness. It must<br />

be admitted, of course, that in most cases, he was right and they were wrong; but this does not<br />

excuse his bad manners. And the Church began to worry about the sheer dogmatism with which he<br />

asserted his opinions.<br />

This was, in fact, a matter in which the Church had right on its side. Cardinal Robert Bellarmine,<br />

one of the soundest thinkers of his time, said that if Galileo thought that Copernicus was right, then<br />

it was up to him to prove it. And this was precisely what Galileo could not do. For he still lacked<br />

one essential insight: a theory of gravitation. Only gravity could explain why the planets circled<br />

around the sun as if attached to strings, and why they had reacted on one another until their orbits

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!