24.02.2013 Views

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

That is why, when we read the Elizabethans, we feel that their minds are akin to our own. Dante,<br />

Chaucer, Petrarch, even Malory, seem to be strangers, inhabitants of another universe. They<br />

accepted that there was some great scheme of things, of which they were a tiny part. The<br />

Elizabethans were the first generation to grow up in a new climate of religious scepticism. The<br />

English had never really been interested in religion. As Conyers Read says, ‘in thirty years they<br />

accepted five distinct changes in their religion without any great fuss about the matter.’ (The<br />

Tudors p. 138.) A people who could accept these swings from Protestantism to Catholicism and<br />

back again as a matter of course were not likely to feel that either had a monopoly of religious<br />

truth. They might not be in the least inclined towards atheism, but the new religious climate was<br />

bound to make them willing to discuss such questions as predestination - the doctrine upheld by<br />

Calvin - and the immortality of the soul. (Marlowe’s contemporary Sir Walter Raleigh acquired a<br />

reputation for atheism because of his eagerness to discuss such topics over the dinner table.) And<br />

men who cease to feel that such subjects are forbidden have begun to take responsibility for their<br />

own consciences. They are thinking and behaving like individuals.<br />

Christian dogma was also being undermined from another direction - but so gradually and gently<br />

that at first no one paid any attention. In 1506, eleven years before Luther nailed up his theses on<br />

the church door, a quietly-spoken physician named Nicholas Copernicus became secretary and<br />

medical adviser to his uncle, the bishop of Ermland, between Prussia and Poland. Copernicus was a<br />

canon of the Church, and his hobby was astronomy. Six years later, when his uncle died of food<br />

poisoning, Copernicus had more time to devote to the stars, and he wrote a small book suggesting<br />

that the sun is the centre of the universe and that the earth is a ball that travels round it once a year.<br />

This amazing assertion contradicted everything believed by the Church throughout the Middle<br />

Ages, which accepted the complex system of Ptolemy in which the earth is the centre of the<br />

universe. To anyone who observed the heavens closely, Ptolemy’s system had enormous<br />

disadvantages, in that it had to explain why the planets travel around the earth in such strange and<br />

complicated orbits - sometimes even going backwards. Copernicus, who was a timid little man and<br />

in no way a revolutionary, saw that these contradictions vanished if he assumed that the earth goes<br />

round the sun, like all the other planets. No one was shocked by Copernicus’s ideas, even when he<br />

published On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Bodies in 1542; in fact, the pope’s right-hand man,<br />

Cardinal Schoenberg, suggested that the book ought to be published, and no one paid much<br />

attention when it appeared. Copernicus died shortly after it came out, and was soon forgotten. Half<br />

a century later, the greatest astronomer of his time, the Dane Tycho Brahe, was convinced that<br />

Copernicus was mistaken and that the earth was the centre of the universe. His reason had nothing<br />

to do with religious prejudice. He saw that if the earth moved round the sun, then it must travel<br />

millions of miles every year. In that case, the stars ought to change their positions - as a church<br />

tower changes its position when seen from a moving train. And they don’t. Tycho did not realise<br />

that the stars are so many billions of miles away that we would not notice the small changes in their<br />

position - it would be many years before someone would invent an instrument delicate enough to<br />

measure it.<br />

Although Tycho had no magnifying telescope - they had not yet been invented - he made thousands<br />

of minute observations of the position of the planets. When he died in 1601, his young assistant<br />

Johannes Kepler, who believed in Copernicus’s theory, studied Tycho’s figures and tried to<br />

understand the laws that governed the planets. What baffled him was that Tycho’s figures showed<br />

that every planet travels at different speeds at different times. That seemed absurdly complicated.<br />

Then, one day, he succeeded in working out the shape of such an orbit, and saw that it was not at all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!