24.02.2013 Views

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

after this, there emerged another form of man with a still larger brain - about 700 cc - and who used<br />

primitive flint tools. He has been labelled homo habilis. And he, like Australopithecus, was active<br />

during an epoch of unprecedentedly bad weather - droughts, floods, ice ages - called the<br />

Pleistocene, which began about two million years ago. No one knows quite what caused the<br />

Pleistocene. The most popular theory is that polar ice reached such proportions that it began to split<br />

apart under its own pressure and giant icebergs floated towards the equator. But from man’s point<br />

of view, the ice and floods of the Pleistocene were infinitely preferable to the long drought - in<br />

Africa, almost twelve million years long - of the Pliocene. This was the period when man suddenly<br />

put on an evolutionary spurt and began to outdistance every other animal on the face of the earth,<br />

including his cousin the ape. And during the next million years there emerged the creature who<br />

murdered his prisoners in the caves at Chou-kou-tien: homo erectus. His brain was about twice as<br />

big as that of Australopithecus - which makes it about two-thirds the size of that of modern man.<br />

We know that he used fire, although he did not know how to make it; and this itself argues a highly<br />

evolved social life. It implies that when hunters came upon a tree that had been set on fire by<br />

lightning, they carefully carried away burning branches and then appointed guardians to keep it<br />

permanently alight. Man was learning to think ahead, and had therefore outpaced every other living<br />

animal. From the fact that only skulls were found in the Chou-kou-tien caves, we may speculate<br />

that homo erectus was a head hunter, and that therefore his capacity for violence was already well<br />

developed.<br />

And still the human brain went on expanding. In the half million years between Peking man and<br />

ourselves, it grew by another third, and most of that growth was in its top layer, the cerebrum - the<br />

part with which we think. No one knows quite why it expanded so fast. Ardrey even suggests the<br />

fascinating notion that it may have been connected with a huge meteor - or perhaps a small asteroid<br />

- that exploded over the Indian Ocean about 700,000 years ago. Its fragments - known as tektites -<br />

can still be found scattered over more than twenty million square miles. At the same time, the<br />

earth’s poles reversed, so that south became north and vice versa. No geologist can yet explain why<br />

this happened - or why it has happened on a number of previous occasions in the earth’s history. At<br />

all events, Ardrey suggests that the explosion, or the reversal of the earth’s polarity, or both,<br />

somehow triggered the ‘brain explosion’. During the reversal period, the planet would be<br />

temporarily without a magnetic field, and the result could be that earth experienced a sudden heavy<br />

bombardment of cosmic rays and other high-speed particles of the kind that are at present diverted<br />

by the Van Allen belts around us. There would also be a sudden rise in the temperature of the<br />

earth’s atmosphere. Both these factors could cause genetic mutations which might be responsible<br />

for the ‘brain explosion’. On the other hand, this ‘catastrophe theory’ may be unnecessary. If man’s<br />

brain had already doubled in size between Australopithecus and the first homo erectus about a<br />

million years later, then there is nothing very startling in a further increase of about a third in<br />

another half million years.<br />

There is, however, one outstanding mystery. Peking man already had a brain that was far bigger<br />

than that of Australopithecus; in fact, some of the larger-brained Peking men had brains as big as<br />

some smaller-brained modern men. What did he do with it? He certainly learned to build himself<br />

crude shelters made of branches, and developed more elaborate hunting techniques - he had even<br />

learned to kill elephants. Yet his tools made practically no advance. A mere 300,000 years ago,<br />

homo erectus was still using the crude flint choppers that homo habilis had been using two million<br />

years ago. And so things continued down to the time of Neanderthal man, who appeared on the<br />

scene only about a hundred thousand years ago. He was still a thoroughly ape-like creature with a<br />

receding chin and receding forehead, and his cave-dwellings indicate that he was also a cannibal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!