24.02.2013 Views

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

A CRIMINAL HISTORY OF MANKIND

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Under Fouché, the chief of police in Paris was a certain M. Henry. One day in 1809, he received a<br />

visit from a powerfully-built young man called Eugene-Francois Vidocq, who offered information<br />

about certain criminals in exchange for immunity. Vidocq was totally frank with Henry; his life had<br />

been adventurous, and a hot temper and a love of pretty women had brought him more than his<br />

share of trouble with the law. He had been a smuggler, and had escaped from prison, and even from<br />

the galleys. Now he wanted a quiet life. Henry could see Vidocq felt trapped; but he wanted him to<br />

feel still more trapped, until he would do anything that was asked of him. So M. Henry declined his<br />

offer and allowed him to go.<br />

What Vidocq had not told Henry was that he was now involved with a gang of coiners. They<br />

denounced him to the police, who called when Vidocq was in bed; he was arrested, nearly naked,<br />

on the roof. When M. Henry saw the prisoner, he felt pleased with himself; now Vidocq was well<br />

and truly trapped. Henry was now able to state his own terms. And they were that Vidocq should<br />

become a police spy and betray his associates. It was hard, but Vidocq had no alternative than to<br />

accept. He was taken to the prison of La Force, with the task of spying on his fellow prisoners. It<br />

was dangerous work, but freedom depended on doing it well. He did so well, reporting undetected<br />

crimes to M. Henry, and the whereabouts of stolen goods, that M. Henry decided to give him his<br />

freedom - as a police spy. Vidocq was loaded with chains for transfer to another prison; on the way<br />

he was allowed to escape. It made him the hero of the criminal underworld of Paris. His first task<br />

was to track down a forger named Watrin, who had escaped and totally disappeared. Cautious<br />

enquiries revealed that Watrin had left some possessions in a certain room. Vidocq waited for him<br />

to reappear, captured him after a desperate struggle, and dragged him off to M. Henry. There was a<br />

large reward. Soon after, Watrin was guillotined. So was another forger named Bouhin - the man<br />

who had denounced Vidocq to the police two years earlier. He had been arrested on Vidocq’s<br />

information.<br />

During the next few years, Vidocq showed himself to be the most determined, efficient and<br />

enterprising police agent in Paris. His success aroused intense jealousy in the Police Prefecture, and<br />

his colleagues often denounced him as a man who was really in league with the criminals. M.<br />

Henry knew better; he knew Vidocq was too attached to his new-found security. He also knew that<br />

the rivalry between his men was the greatest threat to the efficiency of the Paris police. Every area<br />

in the city had its local station, and there was little co-operation between them. So when Vidocq<br />

suggested forming a small force of men who could move freely anywhere in the city, Henry<br />

immediately seized upon the idea. Vidocq was allowed four helpers, all chosen by himself -<br />

naturally, he chose criminals. There was fierce opposition from all the local police departments,<br />

who objected to strangers on their ‘patches’, but Henry refused to be moved. Vidocq’s little band<br />

was called the Security - Sureté - and it became the foundation of the French national police force<br />

of today.<br />

In 1833, Vidocq was forced to retire, because a new chief of police objected to a Sureté made up<br />

entirely of criminals and ex-criminals. He immediately became a private detective - the first in the<br />

world - and wrote his Memoirs. He became a close friend of writers, including Balzac, who<br />

modelled his character Vautrin on Vidocq.<br />

For the modern reader, the most astonishing thing about Vidocq’s Memoirs is that the crimes were<br />

so singularly un-vicious. This is not to say that criminals were not perfectly capable of murder;<br />

only that there was a complete absence of the kind of anti-social resentment that distinguishes so<br />

many modern criminals. Burglary or robbery with violence was simply a profession, usually<br />

embraced by people who drank too much and liked to keep more than one mistress. Many robbers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!