28.02.2013 Views

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Structural Chromosome Rearrangements 189<br />

have clinical findings associated with a partial monosomy. <strong>The</strong> specific phenotype <strong>of</strong> the individual<br />

will depend on both the amount and the nature <strong>of</strong> the deleted material. Similarly, for a patient with a<br />

supernumerary ring chromosome, the size <strong>of</strong> the ring, its genetic content, and the proportion <strong>of</strong> cells<br />

that contain the ring will all influence phenotype.<br />

Another phenomenon that has the potential to impact on the phenotype <strong>of</strong> individuals with ring<br />

chromosomes is uniparental disomy (UPD) (see Chapter 19). Petersen et al. described a patient with<br />

mosaicism for a normal cell line and a cell line in which one normal copy <strong>of</strong> chromosome 21 was<br />

replaced by a ring (95). Uniparental isodisomy for chromosome 21 was present in the normal cell line.<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors suggested that the isodisomy developed when the normal 21 was duplicated in a cell that<br />

had lost the ring (“monosomy rescue”). Similarly, Crolla reported a patient with a supernumerary ring<br />

6 in which the normal copies <strong>of</strong> chromosome 6 showed paternal isodisomy (96). Rothlisberger et al.<br />

have reported a single case <strong>of</strong> mosaicism involving a cell line with a supernumerary ring derived from<br />

chromosome 1 and a normal cell line with maternal uniparental heterodisomy for chromosome 1 (97).<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> uniparental heterodisomy (rather than isodisomy as described earlier) suggests that<br />

both <strong>of</strong> the abnormal cell lines in this patient could have arisen secondary to trisomy rescue events (see<br />

Chapter 19). Presumably, the original zygote had three copies <strong>of</strong> chromosome 1: one paternal chromosome<br />

1 and two different maternal chromosome 1’s. Conversion <strong>of</strong> the paternal chromosome 1 into a<br />

small ring would then produce a cell line with a survivable partial trisomy 1, rather than a lethal complete<br />

trisomy. Subsequent loss <strong>of</strong> the ring chromosome would then ultimately produce a disomic cell<br />

with the expected two copies <strong>of</strong> chromosome 1 and uniparental maternal heterodisomy for chromosome<br />

1. Given that current data suggest there are no maternally imprinted genes on chromosome 1 that influence<br />

phenotype, the resulting disomic cell line would be expected to demonstrate normal viability and,<br />

perhaps, a selective growth advantage compared to the cell line with partial trisomy 1.<br />

One recurring phenotype seen in ring chromosome heterozygotes is the “ring syndrome,” originally<br />

proposed by Cote et al. in 1981 (98). <strong>The</strong>se patients have 46 chromosomes, 1 <strong>of</strong> which is a ring<br />

chromosome with no detectable deletion. <strong>The</strong> ring is derived from one <strong>of</strong> the larger chromosomes in<br />

the karyotype, and the larger the chromosome, the more severe the phenotype. Typically, these<br />

patients have severe growth retardation without major malformations. Minor anomalies and mild to<br />

moderate mental retardation are <strong>of</strong>ten part <strong>of</strong> the picture. <strong>The</strong> ring syndrome is believed to result<br />

from instability <strong>of</strong> the ring chromosome. <strong>The</strong> larger chromosomes are thought to be more unstable<br />

than the smaller ones because they present more opportunities for sister chromatid exchange. <strong>The</strong><br />

breakage that occurs during cell division generates new ring structures, most <strong>of</strong> which represent a<br />

more serious genetic imbalance than the previous forms and are, thus, less viable. This results in<br />

increased cell death and contributes to growth failure and the disturbance <strong>of</strong> developmental pathways<br />

(99). Kosztolanyi has proposed that this phenomenon might also contribute to the severity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

phenotype in patients who have ring chromosomes with obvious deletions (99).<br />

A 1991 literature review discovered 32 reported cases in which a ring chromosome was inherited<br />

from a carrier parent. <strong>The</strong> authors concluded that no more than 1% <strong>of</strong> ring chromosomes are inherited.<br />

Among the 32 patients with inherited rings, half had a phenotype similar to the carrier parent,<br />

whereas approximately one-third were more severely affected (100). In over 90% <strong>of</strong> inherited ring<br />

chromosome cases, the carrier parent is the mother (29).<br />

In addition to the risks associated with ring instability, carriers <strong>of</strong> ring chromosomes might also be<br />

at risk for having children with other abnormalities involving the chromosome from which their ring<br />

is derived. <strong>The</strong>re are at least three reports <strong>of</strong> carriers <strong>of</strong> a ring chromosome 21 who had <strong>of</strong>fspring with<br />

trisomy 21 secondary to a translocation or tandem duplication <strong>of</strong> chromosome 21 (100).<br />

RECIPROCAL AUTOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS<br />

Reciprocal translocations represent one <strong>of</strong> the most common structural rearrangements observed<br />

in humans. Estimates <strong>of</strong> the population frequency range from 1/1000 to 1/673 (1,101). A reciprocal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!