28.02.2013 Views

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prenatal <strong>Cytogenetics</strong> 307<br />

to women who took these medications 3 months before and 1 month after conception. <strong>The</strong>re is no<br />

known increased risk for chromosome abnormalities, but if amniocentesis is being performed, it is<br />

prudent to perform cytogenetic analysis on the specimen.<br />

Women with Gestational Diabetes or Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus<br />

It was thought in the past that women with gestational diabetes have a minimally increased risk <strong>of</strong><br />

having <strong>of</strong>fspring with malformations. It is now known that some women classified as having gestational<br />

diabetes are probably unrecognized insulin-dependent diabetics (251). Rosenn et al. (252) and<br />

Schaefer et al. (253) evaluated glycemic thresholds as predictors for congenital malformations. Both<br />

found that a fasting first-trimester blood glucose concentration <strong>of</strong> less than 120 mg/dL was associated<br />

with no increased risk in malformations. Specifically, the risks for NTDs range from a 10-fold (254)<br />

to a 20-fold (255) increased risk in infants <strong>of</strong> diabetic mothers. Because some centers <strong>of</strong>fer amniocentesis<br />

for detection <strong>of</strong> NTDs for this indication, cytogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> the specimen would also be<br />

prudent.<br />

Advanced Paternal Age<br />

A body <strong>of</strong> old literature in genetics suggests an increased risk <strong>of</strong> fetal chromosome abnormality<br />

with advanced paternal age, but the most carefully constructed analyses do not support this association<br />

(256–259). Advanced paternal age is not associated with fetal chromosome abnormalities. It is,<br />

however, associated with a linearly increased risk <strong>of</strong> some autosomal dominant new mutations in the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fspring (260). In a policy statement on the subject, the American College <strong>of</strong> Medical Genetics<br />

points out the fourfold to fivefold risk in <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> men in their forties versus those <strong>of</strong> men in their<br />

twenties. <strong>The</strong> relative increased risk for these defects is related to advanced age <strong>of</strong> the father for<br />

autosomal dominant conditions and the maternal grandfather for X-linked conditions. Family histories<br />

will not provide clues, as these types <strong>of</strong> mutations are sporadic. Examples <strong>of</strong> autosomal dominant<br />

conditions associated with advanced paternal age include achondroplasia, neur<strong>of</strong>ibromatosis, Marfan<br />

syndrome, Treacher Collins syndrome, Waardenberg syndrome, thanatophoric dysplasia, osteogenesis<br />

imperfecta, and Apert syndrome. Examples <strong>of</strong> X-linked conditions associated with increased<br />

maternal grandfather’s age include fragile X syndrome (see Chapter 18), hemophilia A (factor VIII<br />

deficiency), hemophilia B (factor IX deficiency), Duchenne muscular dystrophy, incontinentia<br />

pigmenti, Hunter syndrome, Bruton agammaglobulinemia, and retinitis pigmentosa (261). <strong>The</strong> American<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Medical Genetics acknowledges the risk but states that ultrasound examination is<br />

usually <strong>of</strong> little benefit. Genetic counseling is indicated so the expectant couple can understand the<br />

issues, and it is prudent to <strong>of</strong>fer detailed fetal ultrasound examination in pregnancies involving men<br />

40–45 years and older (261).<br />

Special Issues<br />

True Mosaicism and Pseudomosaicism<br />

Mosaicism, or the presence <strong>of</strong> two or more cell lines in culture, is one <strong>of</strong> the most complex and<br />

challenging issues in prenatal diagnosis. <strong>The</strong>re are three levels <strong>of</strong> mosaicism in amniotic fluid and CVS<br />

culture—levels I, II, and III. Level I is defined as a single-cell abnormality. Level II is defined as a<br />

multiple-cell abnormality or (with an in situ culture method) a whole colony abnormality in one<br />

culture not seen in any other cell cultures. Level III mosaicism is “true” mosaicism—the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

a second cell line in two or more independent cultures. <strong>The</strong> incidences <strong>of</strong> these in amniotic cell<br />

cultures range from 2.5% to 7.1% for level I, 0.6–1.1% for level II, and 0.1–0.3% for level III mosaicism<br />

(262–264).<br />

<strong>The</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> the mosaic cell line cannot be determined without molecular studies. In general,<br />

however, it appears that the majority <strong>of</strong> 45,X/46,XX cases occur after a normal disomic fertilization,<br />

most mosaic trisomies are the result <strong>of</strong> postzygotic loss <strong>of</strong> the trisomic chromosome, and for trisomy<br />

8, most cases are the result <strong>of</strong> somatic gain <strong>of</strong> the third chromosome 8 postzygotically (265).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!