28.02.2013 Views

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

504 Dana Crawford and Patricia Howard-Peebles<br />

Reyniers et al. (122) showed that full mutation or mosaic full/premutation males only produce<br />

premutation sperm and, therefore, premutation daughters, because repeat expansion occurs only in<br />

females (33). Testicular selection against full mutation sperm is unlikely since male Fmr1 knockout<br />

mice show fertility (123). <strong>The</strong>se data support a model <strong>of</strong> expansion only in somatic cells and protection<br />

<strong>of</strong> the premutation in the germline cells. However, Malter et al. showed, in full mutation fetuses,<br />

that only full mutation alleles (in the unmethylated state) were found in oöcytes from intact ovaries or<br />

in immature testes from 13-week fetuses, but that both full and premutation alleles were found in the<br />

germ cells <strong>of</strong> a 17-week male fetus (124). <strong>The</strong>y hypothesize that the full mutation contracts in the<br />

fetal testes, with subsequent selection for the premutation sperm. In females, the expansion could<br />

occur during maternal oögenesis or very early in embryogenesis, prior to general methylation. <strong>The</strong><br />

answer requires analysis <strong>of</strong> oöcytes from premutation females.<br />

CURRENT GENETIC ASPECTS OF FRAGILE X SYNDROME<br />

Prevalence <strong>of</strong> Full Mutations and Premutations<br />

Using the cytogenetic technique developed in the late 1970s described above (2), Webb et al.<br />

(125) and Turner et al. (126) tested school-aged children with mental retardation from Coventry,<br />

England, and Sydney, Australia, respectively, for the fraX. In both studies, the investigators assumed<br />

that all males affected with the fragile X syndrome are mentally retarded and would be found among<br />

programs, schools, or institutions for children with special needs. Under this assumption, both groups<br />

tested the target population for fraX and extrapolated their findings to the general population, giving<br />

an estimate <strong>of</strong> 1 in 1000 males and 1 in 2610 males, respectively. Similarly designed studies in Sweden<br />

(127) and Finland (128) supported these estimates <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> the fragile X syndrome among<br />

males and firmly established the syndrome as the second most common cause <strong>of</strong> mental retardation.<br />

As previously discussed, the cytogenetic test employed by these early prevalence studies proved<br />

to be inaccurate, missing 6–10% <strong>of</strong> affected males and at least 30% <strong>of</strong> the females (100,129). <strong>The</strong><br />

cytogenetic test also produced false positives, which is discussed in further detail below. Once FMR1<br />

was cloned in 1991, more accurate and sensitive techniques became available for diagnosis. Using<br />

the new DNA-based technology, the Coventry and Sydney groups revisited their original study populations<br />

and revised the prevalence <strong>of</strong> the full mutation as 1 in 4167 and 1 in 4348 males, respectively<br />

(130). Since then, several large, population-based studies have established that the prevalence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

full mutation is probably between 1 in 6000 to 1 in 4000 males <strong>of</strong> northern European descent (131).<br />

Although fraX has been identified in individuals with cytogenetic abnormalities such as XXY, XXX,<br />

XYY, and +21, as well as in those with other genetic disorders such as neur<strong>of</strong>ibromatosis, these cases<br />

are likely coincidental as a result <strong>of</strong> the frequencies <strong>of</strong> both disorders in human populations. Despite<br />

the downward revision <strong>of</strong> prevalence, the fragile X syndrome remains the second most frequent<br />

known cause <strong>of</strong> mental impairment, surpassed only by Down syndrome.<br />

Estimates for the prevalence <strong>of</strong> the full mutation among other racial/ethnic groups as well as<br />

females are generally lacking. To date, only two population-based studies in African-derived populations<br />

have been performed, and they suggest that the frequency <strong>of</strong> the full mutation is at least equal,<br />

if not higher, compared with European-derived populations (131). For females, no population-based<br />

studies have been performed to date. Based on the fact that the gene responsible for the fragile X<br />

syndrome is on the X chromosome and the fact that only females can transmit the disease-causing<br />

mutation to their <strong>of</strong>fspring, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> the full mutation among females is expected to equal<br />

the prevalence estimated for males. However, because <strong>of</strong> X-activation and possibly other factors,<br />

only 30–50% <strong>of</strong> females with the full mutation are mentally retarded (IQ 70.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!