28.02.2013 Views

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Structural Chromosome Rearrangements 195<br />

sequences and/or other repetitive DNA sequences located within the short arms <strong>of</strong> the acrocentric<br />

chromosomes has been proposed. Nonrandom suppression <strong>of</strong> one centromere appears to provide<br />

mitotic stability to some <strong>of</strong> the dicentric Robertsonian chromosomes (73,127). In other cases, both<br />

centromeres appear to be active. It is believed that because <strong>of</strong> their close proximity, both centromeres<br />

are able to function as one in these dicentric chromosomes (128). It should be noted that current<br />

nomenclature (see Chapter 3) still calls for the description <strong>of</strong> all Robertsonian translocations as<br />

monocentric and that this is used in most laboratories.<br />

Homologous Robertsonian Translocations<br />

In contrast to nonhomologous Robertsonian translocations, de novo whole-arm exchanges involving<br />

homologous or like chromosome pairs are very rare. <strong>The</strong>y appear to be predominantly<br />

monocentric (82,123) and several <strong>of</strong> them have been shown to form postmeiotically (87,129,130).<br />

Although historically all such rearrangements were collectively called homologous Robertsonian translocations,<br />

recent molecular studies have shown that approximately 90% <strong>of</strong> the chromosomes within this<br />

category might actually be isochromosomes composed <strong>of</strong> identical rather than unique homologous arms<br />

(82,83,86,131). Molecular studies exploring the parental origin <strong>of</strong> de novo homologous Robertsonian<br />

translocations suggest that no parental bias exists. Equal numbers <strong>of</strong> maternally and paternally derived<br />

isochromosomes have been reported, and true homologous Robertsonian translocations in balanced<br />

carriers appear to be composed <strong>of</strong> both a maternal homolog and a paternal homolog.<br />

Reproductive Risks for Carriers <strong>of</strong> Robertsonian Translocations<br />

Carriers <strong>of</strong> Robertsonian translocations are at risk for miscarriages and for <strong>of</strong>fspring with mental<br />

retardation and birth defects associated with aneuploidy, and rarely, uniparental disomy (UPD) or the<br />

inheritance <strong>of</strong> both copies <strong>of</strong> a chromosome pair from a single parent (see Chapter 19). <strong>The</strong> relative<br />

risk for each <strong>of</strong> these outcomes is a function <strong>of</strong> the sex <strong>of</strong> the heterozygous parent and/or the particular<br />

acrocentric chromosome involved. In theory, all chromosome segregations within the carrier parent<br />

<strong>of</strong> a homologous Robertsonian translocation and all malsegregations within nonhomologous<br />

Robertsonian carriers produce monosomic or trisomic conceptions. Because all potential monosomies<br />

and most <strong>of</strong> the potential trisomies are lethal during the first trimester, miscarriage is not uncommon.<br />

Only those Robertsonian translocation chromosomes containing chromosomes 21 or 13 are<br />

associated with an increased risk for having liveborn trisomic <strong>of</strong>fspring. Trisomy 22 occurring secondary<br />

to a Robertsonian translocation could also represent a rare possibility. Because their risk for<br />

aneuploidy is greater than that <strong>of</strong> the general population, it is recommended that all Robertsonian<br />

translocation carriers be <strong>of</strong>fered prenatal testing (see Chapter 12).<br />

Occasionally, abnormal <strong>of</strong>fspring with UPD have also been observed among the children <strong>of</strong> balanced<br />

Robertsonian translocation carriers (27). UPD has been reported in association with both de<br />

novo and familial, homologous, and nonhomologous translocations. Currently, the risk for UPD in a<br />

fetus with a balanced nonhomologous Robertsonian translocation is estimated to be 0.6%, whereas<br />

that for a fetus with a balanced homologous Robertsonian translocation is predicted to be approximately<br />

66% (132). Among liveborn <strong>of</strong>fspring with congenital anomalies who carry a balanced<br />

nonhomologous or homologous Robertsonian translocation, the risk for UPD has been reported to be<br />

4% and 100% (2/2 homologous Robertsonian cases studied), respectively (133). <strong>The</strong> higher incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> UPD noted in association with the balanced homologous Robertsonian translocations parallels<br />

the observation that most <strong>of</strong> these translocations actually represent true isochromosomes. Because<br />

both arms <strong>of</strong> a true isochromosome are derived from a single chromosome, by definition UPD should<br />

be present in these balanced Robertsonian translocation carriers. Whether the risk for UPD varies<br />

depending on whether the translocation is familial or de novo is not currently known.<br />

Postzygotic correction <strong>of</strong> a trisomy through chromosome loss (trisomy rescue) is thought to represent<br />

the most likely mechanism for UPD, although monosomy correction and gamete complementation<br />

could occur as well (132–134). Current data indicate that UPD is most concerning when

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!