28.02.2013 Views

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Cytogenetics</strong> <strong>of</strong> Solid Tumors 427<br />

cally contain numerous clonal and nonclonal chromosomal aberrations, are most <strong>of</strong>ten found in highly<br />

malignant solid tumors. On the other hand, noncomplex karyotypes can be found in either benign or<br />

malignant tumors. <strong>The</strong>refore, the absence <strong>of</strong> cytogenetic complexity is not, in itself, a reassuring<br />

finding. Although increased cytogenetic complexity generally correlates with increasing histological<br />

grade, there is also considerable variability in cytogenetic complexity between different types <strong>of</strong><br />

solid tumor. Among the epithelial tumors, for example, breast carcinomas invariably have complex<br />

karyotypes, whereas renal carcinomas generally have noncomplex karyotypes. Among the mesenchymal<br />

tumors, osteosarcomas invariably have complex karyotypes, whereas equally malignant<br />

Ewing’s sarcomas have noncomplex karyotypes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> chromosome aberrations in solid tumors result in translocation, deletion, or amplification <strong>of</strong><br />

target genes. Translocations are particularly frequent in sarcomas, where they usually create fusions<br />

<strong>of</strong> genes at the breakpoints <strong>of</strong> the participant chromosomes (22,23). Deletions are frequent in carcinomas,<br />

where they likely result in loss <strong>of</strong> tumor suppressor genes. Amplifications, which are manifest<br />

as intrachromosomal homogeneously staining regions or as extrachromosomal double minutes<br />

(see also Chapter 15, Fig. 3) are seen occasionally in solid tumors <strong>of</strong> all types and can be <strong>of</strong> both<br />

prognostic and therapeutic relevance (13,24).<br />

DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC APPLICATIONS<br />

Cytogenetic analyses have given extraordinary insights into the biology and pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> solid<br />

tumors and, in some cases, these insights have then provided the basis for more accurate assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> diagnosis and prognosis. However, cytogenetic methods are not used routinely in the clinical<br />

setting for all solid-tumor types. In some solid tumors, particularly those that are clinically benign,<br />

there is no need for cytogenetic adjuncts, as the diagnosis and prognosis (with expectant cure after<br />

adequate surgery) are straightforward. Other solid tumors, <strong>of</strong> which prostate cancer is a good example,<br />

do not grow well in conventional tissue culture, and therefore routine karyotyping is not an option.<br />

Widespread application <strong>of</strong> cytogenetics in such tumors awaits the identification <strong>of</strong> key genetic predictors,<br />

which might be identified in tumor interphase cells by FISH methods. Still other solid tumors<br />

have extremely complex karyotypes, and there has been little clinical advantage in cytogenetic analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> these, given the formidable task <strong>of</strong> describing the many abnormal chromosomes and given the<br />

questionable clinical relevance <strong>of</strong> the individual chromosomal perturbations. <strong>The</strong> following sections<br />

will highlight the applications <strong>of</strong> cytogenetics in mesenchymal and renal tumors, where the technical<br />

challenges <strong>of</strong> the cytogenetic assays are surmountable and where the cytogenetic findings <strong>of</strong>ten provide<br />

important diagnostic information.<br />

MESENCYMAL TUMORS (SOFT TISSUE AND BONE TUMORS)<br />

Ewing’s Sarcoma<br />

Ewing’s sarcomas are highly aggressive bone and s<strong>of</strong>t tissue tumors, in which the neoplastic cells<br />

are generally <strong>of</strong> the small round cell type. Most Ewing’s sarcomas contain chromosome translocations<br />

involving the Ewing’s sarcoma gene (EWS), which is located on the long arm <strong>of</strong> chromosome<br />

22. <strong>The</strong>se translocations involve a number <strong>of</strong> partner genes (see Table 1); the most common rearrangement<br />

is t(11;22)(q24;q12) (see Fig. 1), which results in oncogenic fusion <strong>of</strong> the FLI1 gene on<br />

chromosome 11 with the EWS gene (25–28). FLI1 encodes a transcription factor belonging to the<br />

ETS family <strong>of</strong> transcription factors, and the oncogenic EWS-FLI1 fusion gene encodes an activated<br />

version <strong>of</strong> this transcription factor. Other Ewing’s sacomas have variant translocations in which the<br />

EWS gene is fused with other ETS family transcription factor genes (see Table 1) (29–33). <strong>The</strong><br />

Ewing’s gene translocations are apparently essential, because they are found in virtually all Ewing’s<br />

sarcomas. <strong>The</strong>se translocations are detected readily by conventional cytogenetic methods, even using<br />

needle biopsy material, because Ewing’s sarcoma cells grow well in culture (2). <strong>The</strong> translocations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!