28.02.2013 Views

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

518 Jin-Chen Wang<br />

(50) and IGF2 (paternal allele active) (51,52), both located on the short arm <strong>of</strong> chromosome 11 at<br />

band 11p15. In the case <strong>of</strong> IGF2, although it is the paternal allele that is active, the maternal allele is<br />

hypomethylated and the paternal allele is methylated at the 5' portion <strong>of</strong> exon 9, similar to the findings<br />

in mouse studies. Unlike this gene in mice, the human IGF2R gene is not imprinted (53).<br />

A difference in DNA replication timing <strong>of</strong> maternal and paternal alleles <strong>of</strong> imprinted genes has<br />

also been observed (54–57). Cell cycle replication timing has been shown to correlate with gene<br />

activity: genes that are expressed generally replicate earlier (58,59). Furthermore, most genes on<br />

homologous chromosomes replicate synchronously (60). This is not the case for imprinted genes.<br />

Using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (see Chapter 17) on interphase nuclei and scoring for<br />

the stage <strong>of</strong> the two alleles in the S-phase, Kitsberg et al. (54) showed that the imprinted genes H19,<br />

Igf2, Igf2r, and Snrpn in mice and their corresponding positions in the human genome all replicate<br />

asynchronously, with the paternal allele replicating early. Studies <strong>of</strong> genes in the 15q11-q13 region in<br />

humans demonstrated that most show a paternal-early/maternal-late pattern, with some exhibiting the<br />

opposite pattern (55,56). <strong>The</strong>refore, it appears that imprinted genes are embedded in DNA domains<br />

with differential replication patterns, which might provide a structural imprint for parental identity (55).<br />

Thus, the process <strong>of</strong> genomic imprinting is very complex, and although DNA methylation plays a<br />

critical role in genomic imprinting, the process is much more complex than simply inactivating a<br />

gene by methylation. It could involve an interaction among DNA methylation, chromatin compaction<br />

(61), DNA replication timing, and potentially other mechanisms (62).<br />

GENOMIC IMPRINTING AND HUMAN DISEASES<br />

Genomic imprinting provides an explanation for the observation that the transmission <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

genetic diseases cannot be explained by traditional Mendelian inheritance, but that the phenotype<br />

depends on whether the gene involved is maternally or paternally inherited. Conversely, the existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> such diseases provides evidence that genomic imprinting occurs in man. Human conditions<br />

that fall into this category include certain deletion/duplication syndromes, a number <strong>of</strong> cancers, and<br />

many situations arising from uniparental disomy (UPD). In addition, imprinted genes could also<br />

contribute to modification <strong>of</strong> disease phenotype, such as is observed in Albright hereditary osteodystrophy,<br />

language development, and some psychiatric disorders and complex behavioral phenotypes,<br />

including bipolar affective disorder and catatonic schizophrenia (63–65).<br />

Chromosome Deletion/Duplication Syndromes<br />

Prader–Willi Syndrome/Angelman Syndrome<br />

<strong>The</strong> best-studied examples <strong>of</strong> genomic imprinting in human disease are the Prader–Willi and<br />

Angelman syndromes. <strong>The</strong>se are clinically distinct disorders; both map to the chromosome 15q11q13<br />

region (66–68), but they involve different genes (69,70). <strong>The</strong> etiologies <strong>of</strong> these disorders<br />

include (1) the absence <strong>of</strong> a parent-specific contribution <strong>of</strong> this region as a result <strong>of</strong> either deletion<br />

(71–74) or UPD (75–79), (2) disruptions in the imprinting process (80–84), and (3) mutations<br />

within the gene (70,85).<br />

<strong>The</strong> clinical phenotype <strong>of</strong> PWS has been well characterized (86). Briefly, it includes hypotonia<br />

during infancy, obesity, hyperphagia, hypogonadism, characteristic facies, small hands and feet,<br />

hypopigmentation, and mental deficiency. Approximately 70% <strong>of</strong> cases have an interstitial deletion<br />

<strong>of</strong> a 4-Mb sequence at 15q11-q13 on the paternally derived chromosome 15 (61). Approximately<br />

25% <strong>of</strong> cases are the result <strong>of</strong> maternal UPD for chromosome 15 (75,78), and 2% or so as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

an abnormality <strong>of</strong> the imprinting process, causing a maternal methylation imprint on the paternal<br />

chromosome 15 (82,83). Many paternally expressed transcripts have been identified in a cluster in<br />

the proximal part <strong>of</strong> the 15q11-q13 region. <strong>The</strong>se include ZNF127, NDN, MAGEL2 (NDNL1),<br />

SNURF/SNRPN, PAR-5, IPW, PAR-1, PWCR1, and at lease seven additional transcripts (reviewed in<br />

ref. 87,88–90). This clustering <strong>of</strong> paternally expressed transcripts suggests strong regional control <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!