28.02.2013 Views

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prenatal <strong>Cytogenetics</strong> 275<br />

women with a high maternal serum α-fetoprotein were considered, it was found that they had a<br />

relative risk <strong>of</strong> spontaneous abortion after amniocentesis <strong>of</strong> 8.3 compared to women with a normal<br />

maternal serum α-fetoprotein level. This equated to an overall relative risk <strong>of</strong> 2.3. Other factors<br />

found to increase the risk <strong>of</strong> spontaneous abortion were transplacental passage <strong>of</strong> the needle (relative<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> 2.6) and discolored amniotic fluid (relative risk <strong>of</strong> 9.9).<br />

An important and <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked component <strong>of</strong> providing risk assessments to patients is the<br />

underlying incidence and timing <strong>of</strong> pregnancy losses. A prospective study <strong>of</strong> 220 ultrasonographically<br />

normal pregnancies in women recruited prior to conception (in order to avoid bias <strong>of</strong> selection) found<br />

a pregnancy loss rate after 8 weeks <strong>of</strong> 3.2% (54). Other studies have shown a maternal age factor in<br />

the loss rate (38). <strong>The</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> trisomies is about 50% higher at 16 weeks compared to term<br />

pregnancies (38), so selection against chromosomally abnormal abortuses is still occurring at 16<br />

weeks. <strong>The</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> spontaneous pregnancy loss after 16 weeks is 1%.<br />

Some genetic counselors and amniocentesis practitioners counsel patients regarding the risk <strong>of</strong> the<br />

amniocentesis relative to the risk <strong>of</strong> a fetal chromosome abnormality and, in effect, use this as a<br />

decision point. In this way, a woman with a risk <strong>of</strong> fetal chromosome abnormality <strong>of</strong> 1 in 200 might<br />

be inclined to decline amniocentesis if the risk <strong>of</strong> miscarriage as a result <strong>of</strong> the procedure was quoted<br />

as 1 in 100 and the risks compared during the counseling session. A maternal age <strong>of</strong> 35 has traditionally<br />

been used as a cut<strong>of</strong>f for the definition <strong>of</strong> advanced maternal age, because the risk <strong>of</strong> a fetal<br />

chromosome abnormality at this age is roughly equivalent to the originally reported risk <strong>of</strong> miscarriage<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> the amniocentesis. This is not sound reasoning because the burdens <strong>of</strong> the risks are<br />

quite different—one burden being the potential lifetime task <strong>of</strong> caring for an individual with mental<br />

retardation and physical/health problems and the other being miscarriage <strong>of</strong> a potentially healthy<br />

fetus (55).<br />

Early Amniocentesis<br />

Interest in early amniocentesis (EA) has risen in recent years, as a result in large part the continued<br />

desire to provide and receive prenatal diagnosis at an earlier gestation without some <strong>of</strong> the risks and<br />

limitations associated with CVS, which are outlined in the following paragraphs. An increase in<br />

sophistication in ultrasound technology has also made earlier imaging <strong>of</strong> fetuses more feasible and<br />

has added to the confidence level <strong>of</strong> the physicians performing the procedure. Adding to this is the<br />

opportunity to measure amniotic fluid α-fetoprotein and acetylcholinesterase, which is not possible<br />

with CVS. One center reported a rise in EA procedures from 3.2% <strong>of</strong> their 495 procedures in early<br />

1985 to 6.5% <strong>of</strong> 980 procedures in late 1987 (56).<br />

Early amniocentesis is usually described as one that occurs before 15 weeks’ gestation. It has been<br />

shown that the earlier a prenatal diagnosis procedure is performed, the higher the fetal loss rate is<br />

(57). One should, therefore, further divide the periods at which amniocentesis is performed to provide<br />

better comparative data for a variety <strong>of</strong> procedures since “true risks . . . appear to be a function<br />

<strong>of</strong> gestational age and less related to the procedure performed” (57).<br />

Although the procedure by which EA is performed is similar to that <strong>of</strong> mid-trimester amniocentesis,<br />

practitioners report several challenges unique to EA. <strong>The</strong> placenta is more widely spread, the<br />

amniotic fluid volume is lower and the amniotic membrane is not yet totally adherent to the uterine<br />

wall, leading to the “tenting” reported by some physicians (58).<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

In one study conducted from 1979 through 1986, 4750 amniocenteses were performed, 541 <strong>of</strong><br />

which were performed before the 15th week since the last menstrual period (59). Outcome data were<br />

available for 298 women, <strong>of</strong> whom 108 were under 35 years <strong>of</strong> age. Fetal loss within 2 weeks <strong>of</strong> the<br />

procedure was seen in 5 pregnancies, all in the 14th week, when 228 <strong>of</strong> the 308 women had the<br />

procedure. When all spontaneous fetal losses were accounted for, there were 11 spontaneous abortions<br />

(3.6%), 2 stillbirths (0.7%), and 1 neonatal death (0.3%), resulting in a total postprocedure loss

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!