28.02.2013 Views

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

444 Jonathan Fletcher<br />

laboratories. This is, in part, because many brain tumors do not grow well in culture, particularly<br />

when the biopsy material is limited in size or in viability. In addition, some <strong>of</strong> the clinically relevant<br />

cytogenetic aberrations are amenable to evaluation by FISH, which can be performed on frozen or<br />

paraffin-embedded material once the histologic diagnosis has been established. Examples include 1p<br />

and 19q deletions in oligodendroglioma, the presence <strong>of</strong> which portends a favorable response to<br />

multiagent chemotherapy regimens (194,195). Other FISH response predictors have been identified<br />

in oligodendroglioma; these include amplification <strong>of</strong> EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) at<br />

7p12 and homozygous deletion <strong>of</strong> CDKN2A at 9p21, which correlate with poor response to chemotherapy<br />

and reduced survival (194). Molecular cytogenetic response predictors will likely be identified<br />

in other brain tumor subtypes. For example, FISH evaluation <strong>of</strong> EGFR amplification in<br />

glioblastoma multiforme might be useful in identifying patients who will benefit from small molecule<br />

or immunologic therapies that inhibit EGFR (196).<br />

GERM CELL TUMORS<br />

Many germ cell tumors contain a characteristic cytogenetic marker, isochromosome 12p, which is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten found in the context <strong>of</strong> a moderately complex karyotype, with clonal polysomies and rearrangements<br />

<strong>of</strong> various other chromosomes (197) (see Fig. 9). <strong>The</strong> isochromosome 12p is uncommon,<br />

albeit not unprecedented in carcinomas and sarcomas (198). <strong>The</strong>refore, demonstration <strong>of</strong> isochromosome<br />

12p, particularly in any poorly differentiated cancer, should provoke strong suspicion <strong>of</strong> a germ<br />

cell origin, but should not be taken as de facto evidence <strong>of</strong> such origin. <strong>The</strong> diagnostic distinction<br />

between germ cell and non-germ-cell tumors is relevant clinically, because malignant germ cell tumors<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten respond well to cisplatin-based (and other) multiagent chemotherapy regimens.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Most malignant solid tumors have clonal chromosome aberrations that can be identified using<br />

cytogenetic methods. Accordingly, a normal karyotype in a malignant solid tumor usually signifies<br />

overgrowth by non-neoplastic, stromal, cells. Benign tumors, on the other hand, <strong>of</strong>ten have normal<br />

karyotypes. Cytogenetic pr<strong>of</strong>iles are <strong>of</strong>ten diagnostic in sarcomas and in renal cancers but are less<br />

useful in certain other solid tumors, particularly those with extremely complex karyotypes or in which<br />

the cells grow poorly in tissue culture. <strong>The</strong> major determinants <strong>of</strong> success in solid-tumor cytogenetics<br />

include: (1) viable starting material, (2) minimal presence <strong>of</strong> non-neoplastic cells in the cultures, and<br />

(3) culture conditions that support growth <strong>of</strong> the neoplastic cells. <strong>The</strong>se cell culture hurdles can be<br />

overcome by performing the analyses on fresh, frozen, or paraffin-embedded tumor (e.g., by FISH).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Sreekantaiah, C., Appaji, L., and Hazarika, D. (1992) Cytogenetic characterisation <strong>of</strong> small round cell tumours using<br />

fine needle aspiration. J. Clin. Pathol. 45, 728–730.<br />

2. Akerman, M., Dreinh<strong>of</strong>er, K., Rydholm, A., et al. (1996) Cytogenetic studies on fine-needle aspiration samples from<br />

osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma. Diagn. Cytopathol. 15, 17–22.<br />

3. H<strong>of</strong>fer, F.A., Gianturco, L.E., Fletcher, J.A., and Grier, H.E. (1994) Percutaneous biopsy <strong>of</strong> peripheral primitive neuroectodermal<br />

tumors and Ewing’s sarcomas for cytogenetic analysis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 162, 1141–1142.<br />

4. Saboorian, M.H., Ashfaq, R., Vandersteenhoven, J.J., and Schneider, N.R. (1997) <strong>Cytogenetics</strong> as an adjunct in establishing<br />

a definitive diagnosis <strong>of</strong> synovial sarcoma by fine-needle aspiration. Cancer 81, 187–192.<br />

5. Cajulis, R.S. and Frias-Hidvegi, D. (1993) Detection <strong>of</strong> numerical chromosomal abnormalities in malignant cells in<br />

fine needle aspirates by fluorescence in situ hybridization <strong>of</strong> interphase cell nuclei with chromosome-specific probes.<br />

Acta Cytol. 37, 391–396.<br />

6. Cajulis, R.S., Kotliar, S., Haines, G.K., Frias-Hidvegi, D., and O’Gorman, M. (1994) Comparative study <strong>of</strong> interphase<br />

cytogenetics, flow cytometric analysis, and nuclear grade <strong>of</strong> fine-needle aspirates <strong>of</strong> breast carcinoma. Diagn.<br />

Cytopathol. 11, 151–158.<br />

7. Limon, J., Dal Cin, P., and Sandberg, A.A. (1986) Application <strong>of</strong> long-term collagenase disaggregation for the cytogenetic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> human solid tumors. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 23, 305–313.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!