28.02.2013 Views

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics - Extra Materials - Springer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

524 Jin-Chen Wang<br />

Fig. 3. A diagrammatic representation <strong>of</strong> maternal UPD formation by “trisomy rescue.” A trisomic zygote<br />

resulting from maternal meiosis I nondisjunction is depicted here. Loss <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the trisomic chromosomes<br />

through either mitotic nondisjunction or anaphase lag results in euploidy. Uniparental disomy occurs in onethird<br />

<strong>of</strong> these cases. m 1 and m 2 : maternally derived chromosomes; p: paternally derived chromosome.<br />

which the father was a heterozygote and the mother was normal (154). <strong>The</strong> child was otherwise<br />

developmentally normal. Three additional patients, one with congenital insensitivity to pain with<br />

anhidrosis, one with Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bulosa, and one with Leber congenital amaurosis,<br />

were recently reported (155–157). All three had paternal isodisomy for chromosome 1. None had<br />

any overt dysmorphisms or malformations. <strong>The</strong>ir phenotype resulted from having two copies <strong>of</strong><br />

the mutated recessive genes, both inherited from their fathers. Another patient was a 43-year-old<br />

female with short stature, ptosis, micro/retrognathia, scoliosis, hearing loss, myopathy, and infertility.<br />

She has isochromosomes for the short arm and long arm <strong>of</strong> chromosome 1 [i(1)(p10),i(1)(q10);<br />

see Chapters 3 and 9] (158). It was not clear whether the abnormal phenotype in this woman resulted<br />

from an imprinting effect or from homozygosity for some undetected recessive alleles. <strong>The</strong>se observations<br />

provide no clear evidence for an imprinting effect <strong>of</strong> paternal UPD 1.<br />

upd(2)mat<br />

Maternal UPD for chromosome 2 has been reported in at least seven cases. Four cases were associated<br />

with confined placental mosaicism (CPM) for trisomy 2 (159–162), two cases resulted from de<br />

novo isochromosome formation <strong>of</strong> the short arm and long arm <strong>of</strong> chromosome 2 [i(2)(p10),i(2)(q10);<br />

see Chapters 3 and 9] (163,164), and one case was discovered at age 3 during paternity testing (165).<br />

In the latter case and one <strong>of</strong> the cases with isochromosomes, no phenotypic abnormalities were present<br />

(161,165). A common phenotype was observed in the other five cases. This includes intrauterine<br />

growth retardation (IUGR), oligohydramnios, pulmonary hypoplasia, hypospadias (in two patients),<br />

and normal development in the four surviving patients at ages 6 months, 20 months, 31 months, and<br />

8 years, respectively. IUGR, oligohydramnios, and pulmonary hypoplasia can be explained by placental<br />

dysfunction as a result <strong>of</strong> trisomy 2 mosaicism. However, these same features were also present<br />

in one <strong>of</strong> the cases with isochromosomes (164), suggesting a possible imprinting effect <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />

UPD 2. In another case reported recently, UPD for maternal 2q and paternal 2p was detected in a 36year-old<br />

woman with normal physical and mental development (166). <strong>The</strong>refore, it is still not clear<br />

whether maternal UPD 2 confers an imprinting effect.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!