01.03.2013 Views

download PDF version: 38.1MB - Global Grey

download PDF version: 38.1MB - Global Grey

download PDF version: 38.1MB - Global Grey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

234<br />

HISTORY OF THE ROS1CRUCIANS.<br />

his hero, and to introduce those passages which refer to the<br />

Eose Cross. This, of course, is conjectural,<br />

but it is to be<br />

remarked that so far as can be possibly ascertained, the<br />

acknowledged symbol of the Fraternity never was a St<br />

Andrew's Cross with four Eoses, but was a Cross of the<br />

ordinary shape, with a Eed Eose in the centre,<br />

or a Cross<br />

rising out of a Eose. There is therefore little real warrant<br />

for the identification of the mystical and the heraldic<br />

badge. It is on this identification, however, that the<br />

Andrean claim is greatly based.<br />

III. We find the " Chymical Marriage," like the "Fama"<br />

and " Confessio Fraternitatis," crusading against the<br />

"vagabond cheaters," "runagates and roguish people," who<br />

debased alchemical experiments in the interest of dishonest<br />

speculation; yet the one, under a thin veil of fiction, de-<br />

scribes the proceedings in the accomplishment of the<br />

magnum opus, while the other terms transmutation a great<br />

gift of God. These points of resemblance, however, do not<br />

necessarily indicate a common authorship, for a general belief<br />

in the facts of alchemy was held at that period by many<br />

intelligent men, who were well aware, and loud in their<br />

condemnation, of the innumerable frauds which disgraced<br />

the science. On the other hand, it is plain that the history<br />

of C. E.G., as it is contained in the " Fama," is not the his-<br />

tory, equally fabulous, of that Knight of the Golden Stone,<br />

who is the hero of the " Chymical Marriage."<br />

IV. It is obviously easy to exaggerate the philological<br />

argument, or rather the argument from the identity of<br />

literary style,<br />

in the documents under consideration. This<br />

point indeed can only be adequately treated by a German.<br />

At present it rests on a single assertion of Arnold, which<br />

is uncorroborated by any illustrative facts. I think it will

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!