03.03.2013 Views

Michelin couv courteGB

Michelin couv courteGB

Michelin couv courteGB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The following table describes the Group’s third party listed security investment portfolio:<br />

In € million Gross Value Provisions Net Value Market Dec. 31, 2004 Value Spread<br />

Appolo Tyres Ltd 25.1 2.4 22.7 22.7 –<br />

PT Gajah Tunggal Tbk 21.1 4.9 16.2 16.2 –<br />

Miscellaneous 35.4 30.8 4.6 4.6 –<br />

Sub-total partly provisioned shares 81.6 38.1 43.5 43.5 –<br />

Peugeot SA 20.8 – 20.8 132.0 111.2<br />

Hankook Tire Company Limited 18.6 – 18.6 27.0 8.4<br />

Miscellaneous 4.0 – 4.0 6.7 2.7<br />

Sub-total shares with unrealized potential gain 43.4 – 43.4 165.7 122.2<br />

Total third-party listed securities 125.0 38.1 86.9 209.1 122.2<br />

Loss on security price paid on acquisition gives rise to provisions in a corresponding amount and gains are not recognized. As a result,<br />

and in view of the level of potential unrealized gains, a 10% across the board change in stock prices would have a €4.4 million impact<br />

on Group earnings.<br />

Counterparty Risk<br />

The Group chooses its banks extremely carefully and even more<br />

so with respect to liquidity investment. Indeed, considering it to<br />

be inappropriate to add financial risk to industrial and trade risk<br />

that are associated with its operations, <strong>Michelin</strong> insists on safety<br />

and liquidity of all cash investment. This is invested in the shortterm<br />

(under three months) with blue chip banks and on<br />

investment-type financial instruments (deposit certificate type).<br />

Credit Risk<br />

The Credit Department, which forms part of the Financial<br />

Department, sets the maximum payment terms and customer<br />

credit limits to be applied by the operating entities. In 2004,<br />

it concentrated on monitoring large account risk, avoiding<br />

collection delays and on revamping systems and processes.<br />

During the financial year, it concentrated on reducing collection<br />

delays monitoring large account risk, and revamping systems and<br />

processes and on credit manager qualification.<br />

At December 31, 2004 the Group’s total trade receivables<br />

amounted to €2.92 billion, corresponding to OE and replacement<br />

customers. This total includes receivables that have been<br />

sold and securitized through consolidated special purpose vehicles<br />

(including ad hoc entities). Receivables from the Group’s ten<br />

largest customers, each accounting for 10% of total or more,<br />

amounted to €566 million. Thirty five customers enjoyed credit<br />

ceilings in excess of €10 million at end December 2004.<br />

Bad debt write-offs for the Group as a whole amounted<br />

to €31.44 million in 2004, or 0.20% of sales. For the period covering<br />

1995 to 2004, average annual losses on receivables stood<br />

at 0.14%, of average prior year sales and the annual volatility rate,<br />

calculated semi-monthly, was 0.20%.<br />

Breakdown of bad debt for the year compared to<br />

average sales of the previous year (1995-2004)<br />

33%<br />

26%<br />

17%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2% 2%<br />

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2%<br />

7%<br />

2%<br />

-- 0.10%<br />

-- 0.05%<br />

0%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.11%<br />

0.17%<br />

0.22%<br />

0.27%<br />

0.33%<br />

0.38%<br />

0.44%<br />

0.49%<br />

0.55%<br />

0.60%<br />

0.65%<br />

0.71%<br />

0.76%<br />

0.82%<br />

0.87%<br />

0.92%<br />

0.98%<br />

1.03%<br />

1.09%<br />

1.14%<br />

1.20%<br />

1.25%<br />

Industrial Hazards<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

25%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

Industrial hazards control is key to our operations over the longterm,<br />

and to the safety of our teams and management of our<br />

assets and the environment. In the 2003/2004 period, we mapped<br />

out our industrial hazards in order to identify them better and draw<br />

up adequate action plans. We therefore classified hazards<br />

according to their seriousness and whether there existed adequate<br />

measures to address them. We also extended the responsibilities<br />

of teams in charge of fire control and of major hazards, to<br />

individual safety as well as the protection of goods and IT systems.<br />

Additionally, the relevant expert know-how was pooled as<br />

part of an Asset Protection Department.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!