20.03.2013 Views

You Are Not Book.indb - Stephen H. Wolinsky Ph. D.

You Are Not Book.indb - Stephen H. Wolinsky Ph. D.

You Are Not Book.indb - Stephen H. Wolinsky Ph. D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Veil of the Concept of the Gunas / 105<br />

(Guna), “as if” one aspect (Sattva) of the ONE SUBSTANCE<br />

is better than another aspect of the ONE SUBSTANCE<br />

(Tamas).<br />

This “spiritual” confusion leads seekers into trying hard<br />

to change and control their actions and personalities and<br />

presentations—in short, the “I,” which they are not. Moreover,<br />

it adds the judgment that sattvic behavior is better than<br />

rajasic behavior “as if” either one is more than a concept<br />

and has something to do with who you are. This belief that<br />

somehow magically, by an “I” becoming more of one (sattvic)<br />

and less of another (tamasic) or, if they are balanced in some<br />

way, “realization” is assured is an illusion. It is this focus on<br />

the outer manifestation or “I” representation that forces the<br />

“seeker” to lose sight of the underlying SUBSTANCE the<br />

Gunas are made of.<br />

Simply put, it is like trying to change a reflection in a<br />

mirror rather than notice the I am that is looking into the<br />

mirror is prior to its reflection.<br />

Recently, “I” was having a conversation with a yoga<br />

practitioner of some 25 years. We were talking about one<br />

Indian Guru who was accused by another Indian Guru of<br />

having blown it because “He had a lot of anger.”<br />

This implication that anger is rajasic and that harmony<br />

is sattvic, and somehow one is better than the other, leads<br />

one to believe that there is more than ONE SUBSTANCE—<br />

there are two, three, or more, which could be or should be<br />

balanced. This contains within it the veil or trap of trying to<br />

change what is not you. This would be like drawing a picture<br />

of a person wearing a loud red shirt with lime-green strips<br />

(rajasic), and then imagining that by changing the colors<br />

of the shirt in the picture to crystal blue, it will somehow<br />

change “you.” In this way, just as you are not the person in<br />

the drawing—you are not the person nor the qualities of the<br />

person represented in the picture.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!