20.03.2013 Views

You Are Not Book.indb - Stephen H. Wolinsky Ph. D.

You Are Not Book.indb - Stephen H. Wolinsky Ph. D.

You Are Not Book.indb - Stephen H. Wolinsky Ph. D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>Ph</strong>ysiology of I AM / 23<br />

system creates 2 a label, “this is a car,” then through further<br />

contracting, creates a description, “My neighbor’s car door<br />

is smashed in.” Further abstracting-condensing can lead<br />

to Inference-1, such as “The owner had an accident.” This<br />

statement is a guess that goes beyond the observable facts.<br />

Still more abstracting-condensing can lead to a “higher”<br />

level Inference-2, “The owner had an accident because he is<br />

a reckless driver.” This inference is even more removed from<br />

the facts the observer had about the condition of the car. This<br />

abstracting-condensing process on successively “higher” levels<br />

can result in a conclusion such as, “I will never let my neighbor<br />

drive me anywhere because we would have an accident.”<br />

What needs to be emphasized again and again is that as we<br />

move from level to level, much of the prior level is omitted<br />

and only a small fraction selected out. This process of omitting<br />

and selecting out is what Korzybski called “abstracting.”<br />

Abstracting is defined, as the act of taking away; forming<br />

an idea apart from concrete things, situations, events, etc.<br />

(American College Dictionary, p. 4). To best appreciate this<br />

term, imagine a scientific article of 75 pages. Now, imagine<br />

an abstract of 2 paragraphs that describes the 75 pages. This<br />

condensation or super-Cliff <strong>Not</strong>es is called an abstract. And, as<br />

we will discuss later, the devil is in the details that are omitted, or<br />

in our case, Nirvana or YOU ARE NOT is in the pre-abstracted<br />

whole (elephant) which is unseen; this pre-consciousness “state”<br />

Nisargadatta Maharaj pointed us to when he asked: “Eight days<br />

prior to conception who were you?”<br />

Now, as is abundantly clear, Inference-3 is “farther” from<br />

THE SUBSTANCE than Inference-2, and Inference-2 is “far-<br />

2 Please note, the nervous system automatically produces an “I” and all<br />

that is to follow, the illusion or veil is the “I” believing that it does, when<br />

the “I” and doership or beliefs, perceptions, actions, etc., have already<br />

taken place. Nisargadatta Maharaj put it this way: “A stage is reached<br />

where one feels deeply that whatever is being done is happening and<br />

one (“I”) has not got anything to do with it.” (Powell, The Ultimate<br />

Medicine, p. 101)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!