20.03.2013 Views

You Are Not Book.indb - Stephen H. Wolinsky Ph. D.

You Are Not Book.indb - Stephen H. Wolinsky Ph. D.

You Are Not Book.indb - Stephen H. Wolinsky Ph. D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46 / <strong>You</strong> <strong>Are</strong> <strong>Not</strong><br />

tag actually represents an abstraction of an abstraction.<br />

I find it amazing that when I label something I see as<br />

apple, something as simple and obvious as that, I am<br />

already at the second level of abstraction. (Korzybski,<br />

Science and Sanity, p.389) (Sawin)<br />

This becomes one of the most extraordinary things. WHAT<br />

“YOU” SEE HAS ALREADY OCCURRED, and, the idea of<br />

“I” chose this or that or “I” created this or that appears after<br />

the experience has already taken place. In other words, the<br />

condensation or water droplet (“I”) that is part of the wave<br />

in the ocean has already hit the beach, when an “I” is formed,<br />

which says “I chose to go to the beach.” In this way, not only<br />

is the past, or what has occurred, the only thing seen by a<br />

nervous system, but also the idea of “I chose this,” “There are<br />

lessons to learn,” “I must have needed this,” etc., etc., appears<br />

with the “I” after the experience has already passed. The illusion<br />

is that the nervous system makes it seem that “you” have<br />

choice and what “you” see is now, when by the time this “you”<br />

is produced and sees—the new is gone and the representation<br />

called “I” sees only what has already happened. In other words,<br />

the produced “I” sees only the past.<br />

Concerning the dots in the label level tag, Korzybski<br />

wrote: We ascribe . . . characteristics to the labels, and<br />

we indicate these characteristics by the little . . . [dots].<br />

The number of characteristics which we ascribe by<br />

definition to the label, is still smaller than the number<br />

of characteristics the object has. (Korzybski, Science and<br />

Sanity, p. 387)<br />

As a practical example, imagine that the first tag represents<br />

the label, “depressed,” then the second tag can represent<br />

a statement like, “depression is bad.”<br />

This is critical to dissecting the lack of “progress” made<br />

in both developing spiritual as well as psychological insight

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!