MCWP 3-16.1 Artillery Operations.pdf - Marine Corps Community ...
MCWP 3-16.1 Artillery Operations.pdf - Marine Corps Community ...
MCWP 3-16.1 Artillery Operations.pdf - Marine Corps Community ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Artillery</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> __________________________________________________________________________________________ 10-17<br />
Step 5: List and Graphically Display Known<br />
Critical Events and Decision Points<br />
From the IPB products developed during mission<br />
analysis, a decision support template is used to<br />
relate the event template with decision points that<br />
are significant to the artillery unit.<br />
The event template overlays the operations<br />
graphics to depict time phase lines (TPLs) on the<br />
battlefield. The operations officer will list<br />
EFATs, which may include massing missions,<br />
special munitions missions, unit movement,<br />
survey emplacement, etc. The decision support<br />
template (DST) does not dictate decisions to the<br />
operations officer but identifies critical events<br />
and threat activities relative to time and location<br />
that may require tactical decisions.<br />
Step 6: Select the War Game Method<br />
The four methods used are sequence of essential<br />
tasks, avenue in depth, belt, and box. See <strong>MCWP</strong><br />
5-1 for a detailed discussion of each technique.<br />
Step 7: Select Method to Record<br />
and Display Results<br />
One method for recording the results is the<br />
synchronization matrix (see figure 10-13 on<br />
page 10-18). It allows the staff to synchronize<br />
the COA across time and space in relation to the<br />
threat COA. An advantage of this method is that<br />
it can be readily translated into a graphic<br />
decision-making product. The first entry is time<br />
or phase of the operation. The second entry is<br />
the most likely threat action as determined by<br />
the S-2. The third entry is the DP for the<br />
friendly COA. The remainder of the matrix is<br />
developed around selected functional areas or<br />
major subordinate commands.<br />
Step 8: Wargame the Battle<br />
Wargame each EFAT. The intelligence officer<br />
will discuss the timing of the battle off the TPL,<br />
the operations officer addresses EFSTs, and the<br />
FDO briefs mission execution times (time of<br />
flight ([TOF], shift times, first round to last).<br />
Wargame the fire plans to make sure they are<br />
executable. The S-2 describes what the threat is<br />
doing and their rate of march. The S-3 adds the type<br />
of target, artillery impact area (front, rear, center of<br />
formation), and the number of rounds and volleys<br />
required. The FDO then states whether or not units<br />
are laid on the target, who will fire, shift time<br />
required, TOF, and total time. It is critical to use<br />
honest times based on the unit’s level of experience<br />
and not just standard <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Corps</strong> Combat Readiness<br />
Evaluation System times. Using this information<br />
and the TPL, place a decision point (star) on the<br />
operations graphics that represents the final time<br />
that the artillery can attain its greatest effects upon<br />
the threat located at that point. Decision points in<br />
the forward battle area may not be observable by<br />
organic assets. These decision points should correspond<br />
to a trigger point of the supported unit who is<br />
watching the decision point. As the S-2 identifies<br />
threat forces at or near decision points, the S-3/FDO<br />
is alerted and expects calls for fire for the target tied<br />
to the decision point.<br />
Use the DST to determine decision points for<br />
other critical events such as unit movements,<br />
special munitions missions, radar queing times,<br />
logistics operations, etc.<br />
Step 9: Refine Staff Estimates and Contributions<br />
Once the war game is complete and the results<br />
annotated, the staff refines their estimates and<br />
contributions. Examples of contributions are<br />
listed in figure 10-14 on page 10-19.