MCWP 3-16.1 Artillery Operations.pdf - Marine Corps Community ...
MCWP 3-16.1 Artillery Operations.pdf - Marine Corps Community ...
MCWP 3-16.1 Artillery Operations.pdf - Marine Corps Community ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10-20 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ <strong>MCWP</strong> 3-<strong>16.1</strong><br />
Wargamed COA<br />
criteria such as mission accomplishment, EFATs,<br />
and battlespace functions. These ranks are totaled<br />
and compared. This comparison gives the<br />
commander the information that he needs to<br />
make a sound decision. However, these rankings<br />
may be more subjective than objective numbers<br />
indicate. The commander and staff must examine<br />
the matrix for sensitivity. For example, one<br />
course of action may be determined to be the<br />
“best,” however, it may not be supportable by<br />
one of the battlespace functions (logistically,<br />
communications, etc.). The commander must take<br />
this into account and determine if additional<br />
support is required or the COA must be adjusted<br />
or thrown out. See figure 10-17.<br />
Commander’s Decision<br />
Inputs Process Outputs<br />
List of critical events and decision points<br />
Information on commander’s evaluation criteria<br />
Advantages<br />
Disadvantages<br />
COA evaluation<br />
COA comparison<br />
The staff compiles the information from the<br />
comparison matrices and then briefs the<br />
commander. Upon selecting a COA, the<br />
commander reviews the COA to determine if it<br />
must be modified or combined with elements of<br />
different COA to mitigate disadvantages. He<br />
Commander’s decision<br />
Prepare the concept of artillery support<br />
Issue the warning order<br />
Figure 10-15. Course of Action Comparison and Decision.<br />
COA Comparison<br />
reviews the mission statement and may refine his<br />
commander’s guidance. He then issues any<br />
additional guidance on priorities for CSS (particularly<br />
for resources he needs to preserve his<br />
freedom of action and to ensure continuous<br />
service support).<br />
Prepare Concept of <strong>Artillery</strong> Support<br />
The staff prepares the framework for the orders<br />
process. The concept of artillery support is a<br />
general description of how the artillery will<br />
support maneuver forces and a generic organization<br />
for combat. The concept of artillery support<br />
normally includes graphics and a narrative.<br />
Issue the Warning Order<br />
Concept of operations<br />
Refined commander’s intent<br />
High pay-off target list<br />
Specified type of rehearsal<br />
Specified type of order<br />
COA 1 COA 2 COA 3<br />
RISK—Least risk COUNTERFIRE—<br />
Simplicity<br />
FIRES—Essential artillery<br />
tasks difficult to accomplish<br />
C2—Difficult to control due<br />
to mobile plan<br />
MISSION/TASKS—Best means of<br />
accomplishing essential artillery tasks<br />
RISK—accepts most risk<br />
Figure 10-16. Advantages and Disadvantages Matrix.<br />
Once the concept of artillery support is complete,<br />
the commander will issue a warning order to<br />
allow his subordinate commanders to perform<br />
concurrent planning.<br />
Once a course of action is chosen and the concept<br />
of artillery support is completed, the staff will