28.03.2013 Views

MCWP 3-16.1 Artillery Operations.pdf - Marine Corps Community ...

MCWP 3-16.1 Artillery Operations.pdf - Marine Corps Community ...

MCWP 3-16.1 Artillery Operations.pdf - Marine Corps Community ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10-20 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ <strong>MCWP</strong> 3-<strong>16.1</strong><br />

Wargamed COA<br />

criteria such as mission accomplishment, EFATs,<br />

and battlespace functions. These ranks are totaled<br />

and compared. This comparison gives the<br />

commander the information that he needs to<br />

make a sound decision. However, these rankings<br />

may be more subjective than objective numbers<br />

indicate. The commander and staff must examine<br />

the matrix for sensitivity. For example, one<br />

course of action may be determined to be the<br />

“best,” however, it may not be supportable by<br />

one of the battlespace functions (logistically,<br />

communications, etc.). The commander must take<br />

this into account and determine if additional<br />

support is required or the COA must be adjusted<br />

or thrown out. See figure 10-17.<br />

Commander’s Decision<br />

Inputs Process Outputs<br />

List of critical events and decision points<br />

Information on commander’s evaluation criteria<br />

Advantages<br />

Disadvantages<br />

COA evaluation<br />

COA comparison<br />

The staff compiles the information from the<br />

comparison matrices and then briefs the<br />

commander. Upon selecting a COA, the<br />

commander reviews the COA to determine if it<br />

must be modified or combined with elements of<br />

different COA to mitigate disadvantages. He<br />

Commander’s decision<br />

Prepare the concept of artillery support<br />

Issue the warning order<br />

Figure 10-15. Course of Action Comparison and Decision.<br />

COA Comparison<br />

reviews the mission statement and may refine his<br />

commander’s guidance. He then issues any<br />

additional guidance on priorities for CSS (particularly<br />

for resources he needs to preserve his<br />

freedom of action and to ensure continuous<br />

service support).<br />

Prepare Concept of <strong>Artillery</strong> Support<br />

The staff prepares the framework for the orders<br />

process. The concept of artillery support is a<br />

general description of how the artillery will<br />

support maneuver forces and a generic organization<br />

for combat. The concept of artillery support<br />

normally includes graphics and a narrative.<br />

Issue the Warning Order<br />

Concept of operations<br />

Refined commander’s intent<br />

High pay-off target list<br />

Specified type of rehearsal<br />

Specified type of order<br />

COA 1 COA 2 COA 3<br />

RISK—Least risk COUNTERFIRE—<br />

Simplicity<br />

FIRES—Essential artillery<br />

tasks difficult to accomplish<br />

C2—Difficult to control due<br />

to mobile plan<br />

MISSION/TASKS—Best means of<br />

accomplishing essential artillery tasks<br />

RISK—accepts most risk<br />

Figure 10-16. Advantages and Disadvantages Matrix.<br />

Once the concept of artillery support is complete,<br />

the commander will issue a warning order to<br />

allow his subordinate commanders to perform<br />

concurrent planning.<br />

Once a course of action is chosen and the concept<br />

of artillery support is completed, the staff will

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!