29.03.2013 Views

A Natural Areas Inventory of the - Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory ...

A Natural Areas Inventory of the - Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory ...

A Natural Areas Inventory of the - Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

intentionally or accidentally from Europe or Asia. While many non-native plants rarely persist very<br />

long outside <strong>of</strong> cultivation, some have become naturalized in North America, and a few have<br />

become serious threats to native biodiversity. Freeman et al. (1997) identified Garlic mustard<br />

(Alliaria petiolata) as a serious pest in floodplain forests on <strong>the</strong> installation. More than a dozen<br />

non-native, woody species also were listed as potential threats and monitoring <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir status was<br />

recommended.<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> this study, we attempted to determine <strong>the</strong> distribution and abundance <strong>of</strong> exotic plants<br />

that represent <strong>the</strong> most serious threats to native biodiversity on FLMR. Our initial interested was<br />

garlic mustard, Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii DC.), Chinese spindle-tree (Euonymus<br />

fortunei (Turcz.) Hand.-Mazz.), autumn-olive (Elaeagnus umbellata Thunb.), Amur honeysuckle<br />

(Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Maxim.), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora Thunb.), and common<br />

privet (Ligustrum vulgare L.). In addition, sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata (Dum. Cours.)<br />

G. Don), added to <strong>the</strong> state noxious weed list in 2000, was documented on FLMR during <strong>the</strong> first<br />

survey. Surveys for it were conducted and are summarized.<br />

Objective 3. Data Management. Data about each population <strong>of</strong> rare plant and animal were<br />

entered into KSNHI's databases using standard <strong>Heritage</strong> methodology. Locations <strong>of</strong> rare species<br />

were mapped onto topographic maps maintained in <strong>the</strong> KSNHI map file. <strong>Natural</strong> community<br />

occurrences that meet KSNHI database criteria also were mapped and added to <strong>the</strong> databases.<br />

<strong>Natural</strong> community locations and plant and animal locations were digitized using ArcView GIS<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware. Attributes describing <strong>the</strong> species and plant community occurrences were attached to<br />

<strong>the</strong>se polygon and point coverages.<br />

Objective 4. Management Recommendations. Preservation <strong>of</strong> native biological diversity is<br />

mandated for Army installations and must be undertaken in ways consistent with military<br />

mission. Effective preservation efforts will require that conservation goals are science-based and<br />

fully integrated with current and planned military activities, recreational and education programs,<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r endeavors. The linchpin <strong>of</strong> an effective preservation program is a set <strong>of</strong> sound<br />

management recommendations, targeted to specific sites, which can be referenced by natural<br />

resource personnel to accomplish well-defined conservation and restoration objectives.<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) <strong>of</strong>fered 15 recommendations intended to maintain and enhance <strong>the</strong><br />

biodiversity <strong>of</strong> natural communities documented on FLMR. The recommendations fell into three<br />

categories: land management, education and promotion, and additional studies. Based on recent<br />

surveys, we have built on <strong>the</strong>se original management recommendations by developing and<br />

expanding <strong>the</strong> management strategies to preserve and enhance <strong>the</strong> natural features <strong>of</strong> FLMR.<br />

Broadly defined, <strong>the</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> this part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study were: 1) maintain and enhance highquality<br />

native communities on <strong>the</strong> installation, 2) improve habitat condition and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

degraded sites, and 3) identify opportunities to restore o<strong>the</strong>r communities and populations. The<br />

methods used in planning require several integrated steps including: 1) establishing clear goals<br />

and objectives; 2) delineating management units; 3) identifying management issues and<br />

concerns; 4) developing recommendations and alternatives for different levels <strong>of</strong> management;<br />

and 5) outlining methods to assess <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan in meeting objectives.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!