29.03.2013 Views

A Natural Areas Inventory of the - Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory ...

A Natural Areas Inventory of the - Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory ...

A Natural Areas Inventory of the - Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX D. A report on a field survey <strong>of</strong> summer bats on FLMR.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Bat Survey <strong>of</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation, <strong>Kansas</strong>,<br />

with Emphasis on Rare and Endangered Species<br />

Dr. Lynn W. Robbins<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology<br />

Southwest Missouri State University<br />

Springfield, MO 65804<br />

(417) 836-5366<br />

fax: (417) 836-4204<br />

lwr704f@smsu.edu<br />

An intensive study was conducted at Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation (FLMR), <strong>Kansas</strong> to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> all bat species on <strong>the</strong> base, but special emphasis was placed on <strong>the</strong><br />

endangered Indiana bat, Myotis sodalis. This species has not been documented in <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

(3D/Environmental Services 1993), but reproductively active individuals have been observed<br />

approximately 160 km (100 mi) east and nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> FLMR in Caldwell and Nodaway counties,<br />

Missouri. Because habitat similarities do exist, it is reasonable to expect that Indiana bats may<br />

occur in suitable habitat near <strong>the</strong> Missouri River.<br />

METHODS<br />

Survey methods were based on <strong>the</strong> recommended mist netting protocol provided by <strong>the</strong> Indiana<br />

Bat Recovery Team (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1999) in conjunction with Anabat II bat<br />

detectors and a species identification program using a call library that includes species known to<br />

be in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong> or adjacent Missouri (Britzke et al. 2002, Murray et al. 1999, 2001).<br />

Methods used consisted <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> mist net sets (two nets not closer than 60 m from each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r) in appropriate areas in <strong>the</strong> floodplain and upland forests. One bat detector, recording call<br />

sequences to a laptop computer, was set up at each net set and left to record throughout <strong>the</strong> night,<br />

wea<strong>the</strong>r permitting. The protocol recommends that <strong>the</strong> nets be set for two nights in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

location. Data presented here are from 8–13 July 2002 and represent <strong>the</strong> first night <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> survey<br />

for each net set, and from May 31 through June 4, and July 17 and 18, 2003 that represent <strong>the</strong><br />

second night <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> survey for localities 1-10, and two nights at locality 11. Data from each net<br />

(A, B) at a site were pooled for each year, <strong>the</strong>n combined for <strong>the</strong> final results.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!