29.03.2013 Views

Wildlife of Lao PDR: 1999 Status Report - IUCN

Wildlife of Lao PDR: 1999 Status Report - IUCN

Wildlife of Lao PDR: 1999 Status Report - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>: <strong>1999</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

severely depleted and their habitat is heavily fragmented. The<br />

status <strong>of</strong> Nomascus gibbons in Cambodia is unclear, but it is<br />

highly unlikely that significant numbers <strong>of</strong> any form other<br />

than H. gabriellae occur, leaving <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong> as supporting the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> remaining H. l. siki and H. l. leucogenys.<br />

On account <strong>of</strong> their small national range and the pressures<br />

on all diurnal primates, White-handed, Pileated and<br />

Black-cheeked Crested Gibbons are all clearly At Risk in<br />

<strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>. White-cheeked Crested Gibbon (including siki)<br />

probably has a large range and so is considered Potentially<br />

At Risk in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>. However, few areas north <strong>of</strong> the Nam<br />

Theun basin support high densities <strong>of</strong> gibbons over a large<br />

area. Thus, if H. l. leucogenys occurs only in this area, as a<br />

subspecies it would better be considered as At Risk in <strong>Lao</strong><br />

<strong>PDR</strong>. The taxonomic uncertainty over the large Xe Pian -<br />

Dong Hua Sao NBCAs population means that Yellowcheeked<br />

Crested Gibbon can only be considered Little Known<br />

in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>.<br />

Conservation Management and Research Proposed for<br />

Gibbons:<br />

• Complete protection <strong>of</strong> gibbons in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong> from hunting<br />

and capture (all except White-handed Gibbon have a<br />

very high to high priority for international conservation<br />

action; Eudey 1987).<br />

• Evaluation and implementation <strong>of</strong> the precise conservation<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> Black-cheeked Crested Gibbon in Nam Kan<br />

PNBCA, its only known site.<br />

• Surveys <strong>of</strong> north-west <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong> for other populations <strong>of</strong><br />

Black-cheeked Crested Gibbon.<br />

• Protection <strong>of</strong> evergreen forest in Dong Khanthung<br />

PNBCA, which supports the only known population <strong>of</strong><br />

Pileated Gibbon in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>.<br />

• Selection <strong>of</strong> key sites for each individual pale-cheeked<br />

taxon, which can only proceed when their distribution is<br />

better understood. Progress with tape-recording and<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> calls, coupled with detailed pelage description,<br />

is needed. For the group as a whole, the Nam Theun<br />

and the Xe Kong basins are both <strong>of</strong> high importance.<br />

The northernmost form (H. l. leucogenys) may prove to<br />

be the most threatened taxon as no large areas <strong>of</strong> the north<br />

are known to hold healthy gibbon populations: Nam Xam<br />

and Phou Louey NBCAs may be the most likely areas.<br />

• Specific consideration to White-handed Gibbon in the<br />

management plan <strong>of</strong> Nam Phoun NBCA, its only known<br />

<strong>Lao</strong> site.<br />

Canidae: Jackals, dogs, foxes (2-6 species in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>; 34<br />

worldwide)<br />

[• Canis lupus Grey Wolf (= Wolf M1, M4, M5 ; = Timber Wolf)].<br />

Conservation Significance: Conditionally At Risk in <strong>Lao</strong><br />

<strong>PDR</strong>. Context: Ginsberg and Macdonald (1990) included<br />

182<br />

northern <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong> in the former range <strong>of</strong> Grey Wolf, but<br />

primary evidence for this is unclear and it may have been an<br />

error (D. Mech and J. Ginsberg pers. comm. to Duckworth et<br />

al. 1998c). However, there are records in southern China from<br />

as close to <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong> as Xishuangbanna (Wang Yingxiang<br />

1987) and it is thus possible that wolf may be found to occur<br />

(or to have formerly done so) in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>. As a large carnivore<br />

it would undoubtedly be at risk in the country were it<br />

found to occur.<br />

• Canis aureus Golden Jackal (= Asiatic Jackal M2 ; =<br />

Jackal M1 ). Conservation Significance: Little Known in <strong>Lao</strong><br />

<strong>PDR</strong>. Documented Range and Habitat: North (RJTiz), centre<br />

(historically, provisionally, Deuve 1972), south<br />

(Duckworth et al. 1998c). Recent records come from large<br />

blocks <strong>of</strong> lowland dry dipterocarp forest; historical and village<br />

information suggests that other open habitats are used.<br />

<strong>Status</strong> Information: Recent records from Xe Pian NBCA (Xe<br />

Kong Plains and Dong Kalo sectors) and Dong Khanthung<br />

PNBCA (Duckworth et al. 1998c). A captive puppy in<br />

Vientiane in 1996 reportedly came from Vientiane Province<br />

(WGR). Two at Ban Keun Zoo were trapped at the zoo’s<br />

chicken farm (close to Phou Khaokhoay NBCA) in 1996 (N.<br />

Krathintong per RJTiz). Delacour (1940) gave no records for<br />

<strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>, but Deuve (1972) claimed occurrence in many<br />

provinces north to Phongsali. Jackals may remain well distributed,<br />

but their noses are reportedly used in traditional<br />

medicine (Martin 1992), and most medium- or large-bodied<br />

mammal species inhabiting open areas are under pressure<br />

(see Duckworth et al. 1998c), so the species is considered<br />

Little Known in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>.<br />

[Canis familiaris Domestic Dog (included in C. lupus M6 )].<br />

Feral dogs may occur in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>, primarily around human<br />

settlements (Corbet and Hill 1992), but there is no evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> self-sustaining populations. Domestic / feral dogs are sometimes<br />

seen, apparently unaccompanied by people, deep within<br />

forest (Duckworth et al. 1998c, Fernando in prep.). Some<br />

village reports taken by the interviewers to indicate Dhole<br />

may well refer to this species or to jackals, as neither <strong>of</strong> the<br />

latter species was included in the standard interview.<br />

[Vulpes vulpes Red Fox]. Recorded from Langson and Cao<br />

Bang, Tonkin, Vietnam (Delacour 1940, Dao Van Tien 1977),<br />

so may extend into extreme northern <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>.<br />

[Nyctereutes procyonoides Raccoon Dog]. Occurs widely in<br />

Tonkin (Vietnam) and (at least formerly) was not rare (Osgood<br />

1932, Bourret 1942); may therefore inhabit adjacent north<br />

<strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>.<br />

• Cuon alpinus Dhole (= Asian Wild Dog M2 ; = Red Dog).<br />

Conservation Significance: Globally Threatened - Vulnerable;<br />

At Risk in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>; CITES Appendix II. Documented

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!