Wildlife of Lao PDR: 1999 Status Report - IUCN
Wildlife of Lao PDR: 1999 Status Report - IUCN
Wildlife of Lao PDR: 1999 Status Report - IUCN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Wildlife</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>: <strong>1999</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
severely depleted and their habitat is heavily fragmented. The<br />
status <strong>of</strong> Nomascus gibbons in Cambodia is unclear, but it is<br />
highly unlikely that significant numbers <strong>of</strong> any form other<br />
than H. gabriellae occur, leaving <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong> as supporting the<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> remaining H. l. siki and H. l. leucogenys.<br />
On account <strong>of</strong> their small national range and the pressures<br />
on all diurnal primates, White-handed, Pileated and<br />
Black-cheeked Crested Gibbons are all clearly At Risk in<br />
<strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>. White-cheeked Crested Gibbon (including siki)<br />
probably has a large range and so is considered Potentially<br />
At Risk in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>. However, few areas north <strong>of</strong> the Nam<br />
Theun basin support high densities <strong>of</strong> gibbons over a large<br />
area. Thus, if H. l. leucogenys occurs only in this area, as a<br />
subspecies it would better be considered as At Risk in <strong>Lao</strong><br />
<strong>PDR</strong>. The taxonomic uncertainty over the large Xe Pian -<br />
Dong Hua Sao NBCAs population means that Yellowcheeked<br />
Crested Gibbon can only be considered Little Known<br />
in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>.<br />
Conservation Management and Research Proposed for<br />
Gibbons:<br />
• Complete protection <strong>of</strong> gibbons in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong> from hunting<br />
and capture (all except White-handed Gibbon have a<br />
very high to high priority for international conservation<br />
action; Eudey 1987).<br />
• Evaluation and implementation <strong>of</strong> the precise conservation<br />
needs <strong>of</strong> Black-cheeked Crested Gibbon in Nam Kan<br />
PNBCA, its only known site.<br />
• Surveys <strong>of</strong> north-west <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong> for other populations <strong>of</strong><br />
Black-cheeked Crested Gibbon.<br />
• Protection <strong>of</strong> evergreen forest in Dong Khanthung<br />
PNBCA, which supports the only known population <strong>of</strong><br />
Pileated Gibbon in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>.<br />
• Selection <strong>of</strong> key sites for each individual pale-cheeked<br />
taxon, which can only proceed when their distribution is<br />
better understood. Progress with tape-recording and<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> calls, coupled with detailed pelage description,<br />
is needed. For the group as a whole, the Nam Theun<br />
and the Xe Kong basins are both <strong>of</strong> high importance.<br />
The northernmost form (H. l. leucogenys) may prove to<br />
be the most threatened taxon as no large areas <strong>of</strong> the north<br />
are known to hold healthy gibbon populations: Nam Xam<br />
and Phou Louey NBCAs may be the most likely areas.<br />
• Specific consideration to White-handed Gibbon in the<br />
management plan <strong>of</strong> Nam Phoun NBCA, its only known<br />
<strong>Lao</strong> site.<br />
Canidae: Jackals, dogs, foxes (2-6 species in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>; 34<br />
worldwide)<br />
[• Canis lupus Grey Wolf (= Wolf M1, M4, M5 ; = Timber Wolf)].<br />
Conservation Significance: Conditionally At Risk in <strong>Lao</strong><br />
<strong>PDR</strong>. Context: Ginsberg and Macdonald (1990) included<br />
182<br />
northern <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong> in the former range <strong>of</strong> Grey Wolf, but<br />
primary evidence for this is unclear and it may have been an<br />
error (D. Mech and J. Ginsberg pers. comm. to Duckworth et<br />
al. 1998c). However, there are records in southern China from<br />
as close to <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong> as Xishuangbanna (Wang Yingxiang<br />
1987) and it is thus possible that wolf may be found to occur<br />
(or to have formerly done so) in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>. As a large carnivore<br />
it would undoubtedly be at risk in the country were it<br />
found to occur.<br />
• Canis aureus Golden Jackal (= Asiatic Jackal M2 ; =<br />
Jackal M1 ). Conservation Significance: Little Known in <strong>Lao</strong><br />
<strong>PDR</strong>. Documented Range and Habitat: North (RJTiz), centre<br />
(historically, provisionally, Deuve 1972), south<br />
(Duckworth et al. 1998c). Recent records come from large<br />
blocks <strong>of</strong> lowland dry dipterocarp forest; historical and village<br />
information suggests that other open habitats are used.<br />
<strong>Status</strong> Information: Recent records from Xe Pian NBCA (Xe<br />
Kong Plains and Dong Kalo sectors) and Dong Khanthung<br />
PNBCA (Duckworth et al. 1998c). A captive puppy in<br />
Vientiane in 1996 reportedly came from Vientiane Province<br />
(WGR). Two at Ban Keun Zoo were trapped at the zoo’s<br />
chicken farm (close to Phou Khaokhoay NBCA) in 1996 (N.<br />
Krathintong per RJTiz). Delacour (1940) gave no records for<br />
<strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>, but Deuve (1972) claimed occurrence in many<br />
provinces north to Phongsali. Jackals may remain well distributed,<br />
but their noses are reportedly used in traditional<br />
medicine (Martin 1992), and most medium- or large-bodied<br />
mammal species inhabiting open areas are under pressure<br />
(see Duckworth et al. 1998c), so the species is considered<br />
Little Known in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>.<br />
[Canis familiaris Domestic Dog (included in C. lupus M6 )].<br />
Feral dogs may occur in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>, primarily around human<br />
settlements (Corbet and Hill 1992), but there is no evidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> self-sustaining populations. Domestic / feral dogs are sometimes<br />
seen, apparently unaccompanied by people, deep within<br />
forest (Duckworth et al. 1998c, Fernando in prep.). Some<br />
village reports taken by the interviewers to indicate Dhole<br />
may well refer to this species or to jackals, as neither <strong>of</strong> the<br />
latter species was included in the standard interview.<br />
[Vulpes vulpes Red Fox]. Recorded from Langson and Cao<br />
Bang, Tonkin, Vietnam (Delacour 1940, Dao Van Tien 1977),<br />
so may extend into extreme northern <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>.<br />
[Nyctereutes procyonoides Raccoon Dog]. Occurs widely in<br />
Tonkin (Vietnam) and (at least formerly) was not rare (Osgood<br />
1932, Bourret 1942); may therefore inhabit adjacent north<br />
<strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>.<br />
• Cuon alpinus Dhole (= Asian Wild Dog M2 ; = Red Dog).<br />
Conservation Significance: Globally Threatened - Vulnerable;<br />
At Risk in <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>PDR</strong>; CITES Appendix II. Documented