07.04.2013 Views

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dispense with the assumption <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> speakers <strong>in</strong> the Karakoram<br />

Mounta<strong>in</strong>s on their way out <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

3.5. Contact with Greek<br />

While the first historical records <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> Gypsies <strong>in</strong> the Byz<strong>an</strong>t<strong>in</strong>e Empire<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>ate from the late eleventh century CE (e.g. Soulis 1961), Tzitzilis (2001: 327–8)<br />

argues on l<strong>in</strong>guistic grounds that <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> contact with Greek must have occurred by the<br />

tenth century. He also suggests that the oldest layer <strong>of</strong> Hellenisms <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> are<br />

lo<strong>an</strong>words from Pontic <strong>an</strong>d Cappadoci<strong>an</strong> dialects <strong>of</strong> Medieval Greek, which <strong>of</strong> course<br />

also makes sense geographically. Differ<strong>in</strong>g degrees <strong>of</strong> morphological <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong><br />

Greek lo<strong>an</strong>words may reflect different layers <strong>of</strong> contact (see Section 5.2). For example,<br />

Greek ðróm-os ‘way’ is fully <strong>in</strong>tegrated as drom <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>, <strong>an</strong>d is likely to be <strong>an</strong><br />

earlier lo<strong>an</strong>word th<strong>an</strong> that <strong>of</strong> Greek fór-os ‘square; market’, which reta<strong>in</strong>s its Greek<br />

nom<strong>in</strong>ative <strong>in</strong>flections <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>. The fact that Greek is the source <strong>of</strong> numerous<br />

<strong>in</strong>flectional <strong>an</strong>d derivational affixes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> (e.g. Boretzky & Igla 1991, Bakker<br />

1997) <strong>an</strong>d the model <strong>of</strong> radical morphosyntactic Balk<strong>an</strong>ization-cum-Hellenization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

l<strong>an</strong>guage (e.g. Friedm<strong>an</strong> 1986, 2000; Matras 1994, 1995) suggests that contact with<br />

Greek <strong>in</strong>volved fluent bil<strong>in</strong>gualism <strong>of</strong> adult <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> speakers. S<strong>in</strong>ce most <strong>of</strong> the Greek-<br />

orig<strong>in</strong> grammatical component is shared by all present-day <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> dialects, we may<br />

safely assume a relatively homogeneous speech community at the time <strong>of</strong> (early) Greek<br />

contact <strong>an</strong>d locate Early <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>, the common <strong>an</strong>cestor <strong>of</strong> all modern <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> dialects,<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Byz<strong>an</strong>t<strong>in</strong>e period.<br />

<strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> reta<strong>in</strong>s three dozen Greek lo<strong>an</strong>words, a third <strong>of</strong> which are not<br />

represented <strong>in</strong> the LWT sample, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g nouns me<strong>an</strong><strong>in</strong>g ‘cabbage’, ‘carrot’, ‘fairy<br />

tale’, ‘lap’, ‘jelly’, <strong>an</strong>d several function words. This number contrasts, for example, with<br />

twice as high a number <strong>of</strong> Hellenisms <strong>in</strong> a familiolect <strong>of</strong> Welsh <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> (Sampson<br />

1926, counted <strong>in</strong> Gr<strong>an</strong>t 2003: 29). 10 Both numbers certa<strong>in</strong>ly represent a mere fraction <strong>of</strong><br />

all Greek lo<strong>an</strong>words that were <strong>in</strong> use <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g its Byz<strong>an</strong>t<strong>in</strong>e period, as<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated by the sum <strong>of</strong> Hellenisms that have been reta<strong>in</strong>ed at least <strong>in</strong> some modern<br />

dialects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> outside <strong>of</strong> the Greek-speak<strong>in</strong>g area. For example, Boretzky & Igla’s<br />

(1994) dictionary conta<strong>in</strong>s a list <strong>of</strong> 238 lo<strong>an</strong>words from Greek; Gr<strong>an</strong>t (2003) lists over<br />

10 Gr<strong>an</strong>t (2003: 29) also counts Greek lo<strong>an</strong>words <strong>in</strong> other <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> dialects such as Lovari (Vekerdi 1983),<br />

but these represent dialect clusters rather th<strong>an</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual local varieties, <strong>an</strong>d so these counts are, strictly<br />

speak<strong>in</strong>g, not comparable to the number <strong>of</strong> lo<strong>an</strong>words <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>.<br />

Elšík <strong>Lo<strong>an</strong>words</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> 11 <strong>of</strong> 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!