Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...
Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...
Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
dispense with the assumption <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> speakers <strong>in</strong> the Karakoram<br />
Mounta<strong>in</strong>s on their way out <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
3.5. Contact with Greek<br />
While the first historical records <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> Gypsies <strong>in</strong> the Byz<strong>an</strong>t<strong>in</strong>e Empire<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>ate from the late eleventh century CE (e.g. Soulis 1961), Tzitzilis (2001: 327–8)<br />
argues on l<strong>in</strong>guistic grounds that <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> contact with Greek must have occurred by the<br />
tenth century. He also suggests that the oldest layer <strong>of</strong> Hellenisms <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> are<br />
lo<strong>an</strong>words from Pontic <strong>an</strong>d Cappadoci<strong>an</strong> dialects <strong>of</strong> Medieval Greek, which <strong>of</strong> course<br />
also makes sense geographically. Differ<strong>in</strong>g degrees <strong>of</strong> morphological <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong><br />
Greek lo<strong>an</strong>words may reflect different layers <strong>of</strong> contact (see Section 5.2). For example,<br />
Greek ðróm-os ‘way’ is fully <strong>in</strong>tegrated as drom <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>, <strong>an</strong>d is likely to be <strong>an</strong><br />
earlier lo<strong>an</strong>word th<strong>an</strong> that <strong>of</strong> Greek fór-os ‘square; market’, which reta<strong>in</strong>s its Greek<br />
nom<strong>in</strong>ative <strong>in</strong>flections <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>. The fact that Greek is the source <strong>of</strong> numerous<br />
<strong>in</strong>flectional <strong>an</strong>d derivational affixes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> (e.g. Boretzky & Igla 1991, Bakker<br />
1997) <strong>an</strong>d the model <strong>of</strong> radical morphosyntactic Balk<strong>an</strong>ization-cum-Hellenization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
l<strong>an</strong>guage (e.g. Friedm<strong>an</strong> 1986, 2000; Matras 1994, 1995) suggests that contact with<br />
Greek <strong>in</strong>volved fluent bil<strong>in</strong>gualism <strong>of</strong> adult <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> speakers. S<strong>in</strong>ce most <strong>of</strong> the Greek-<br />
orig<strong>in</strong> grammatical component is shared by all present-day <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> dialects, we may<br />
safely assume a relatively homogeneous speech community at the time <strong>of</strong> (early) Greek<br />
contact <strong>an</strong>d locate Early <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>, the common <strong>an</strong>cestor <strong>of</strong> all modern <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> dialects,<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Byz<strong>an</strong>t<strong>in</strong>e period.<br />
<strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> reta<strong>in</strong>s three dozen Greek lo<strong>an</strong>words, a third <strong>of</strong> which are not<br />
represented <strong>in</strong> the LWT sample, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g nouns me<strong>an</strong><strong>in</strong>g ‘cabbage’, ‘carrot’, ‘fairy<br />
tale’, ‘lap’, ‘jelly’, <strong>an</strong>d several function words. This number contrasts, for example, with<br />
twice as high a number <strong>of</strong> Hellenisms <strong>in</strong> a familiolect <strong>of</strong> Welsh <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> (Sampson<br />
1926, counted <strong>in</strong> Gr<strong>an</strong>t 2003: 29). 10 Both numbers certa<strong>in</strong>ly represent a mere fraction <strong>of</strong><br />
all Greek lo<strong>an</strong>words that were <strong>in</strong> use <strong>in</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g its Byz<strong>an</strong>t<strong>in</strong>e period, as<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated by the sum <strong>of</strong> Hellenisms that have been reta<strong>in</strong>ed at least <strong>in</strong> some modern<br />
dialects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> outside <strong>of</strong> the Greek-speak<strong>in</strong>g area. For example, Boretzky & Igla’s<br />
(1994) dictionary conta<strong>in</strong>s a list <strong>of</strong> 238 lo<strong>an</strong>words from Greek; Gr<strong>an</strong>t (2003) lists over<br />
10 Gr<strong>an</strong>t (2003: 29) also counts Greek lo<strong>an</strong>words <strong>in</strong> other <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> dialects such as Lovari (Vekerdi 1983),<br />
but these represent dialect clusters rather th<strong>an</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual local varieties, <strong>an</strong>d so these counts are, strictly<br />
speak<strong>in</strong>g, not comparable to the number <strong>of</strong> lo<strong>an</strong>words <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>.<br />
Elšík <strong>Lo<strong>an</strong>words</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> 11 <strong>of</strong> 65