07.04.2013 Views

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ary<strong>an</strong>, viz. <strong>in</strong> the sixth century CE, Beníšek (2006: 23–24) suggests that the shift did<br />

not take place before the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Common Era.<br />

3.3. Contact with other <strong>Indo</strong>-Ary<strong>an</strong> l<strong>an</strong>guages<br />

It is likely that, <strong>in</strong> addition to borrow<strong>in</strong>g from the non-<strong>Indo</strong>-Ary<strong>an</strong> Indi<strong>an</strong> l<strong>an</strong>guages,<br />

there was also lexical borrow<strong>in</strong>g from other <strong>Indo</strong>-Ary<strong>an</strong> varieties <strong>in</strong>to the <strong>Indo</strong>-Ary<strong>an</strong><br />

<strong>an</strong>cestor varieties <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>. First, there may have been lo<strong>an</strong>words <strong>in</strong>to Proto-<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong><br />

from literary <strong>Indo</strong>-Ary<strong>an</strong> l<strong>an</strong>guages, though – assum<strong>in</strong>g that Proto-<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> did not have<br />

<strong>an</strong>y literate speakers – they would have had to be acquired through mediation <strong>of</strong> other<br />

vernaculars. For example, Turner (1926: 151) suggests that <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> truš ‘thirst’ <strong>an</strong>d<br />

rašaj ‘priest’, both reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>, may reflect early lo<strong>an</strong>words from<br />

S<strong>an</strong>skrit. In a later publication he only derives the latter from <strong>an</strong> unattested North<br />

Western Prakrit form (Turner 1962–6: 118), which br<strong>in</strong>gs us to a second, geographical,<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t:<br />

Turner (1926) argues conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>gly that Proto-<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>ated as a Central<br />

<strong>Indo</strong>-Ary<strong>an</strong> variety <strong>an</strong>d, somewhat less conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>gly (cf. Woolner 1928; Beníšek 2006:<br />

23–24), that it must have severed its connection with the Central group before the third<br />

century BCE. He also claims that Proto-<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> speakers then migrated to the Indi<strong>an</strong><br />

northwest, which was actually long (e.g. still <strong>in</strong> Turner 1924: 41) believed to be the<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al home <strong>of</strong> Proto-<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>; there they spent several centuries, borrow<strong>in</strong>g words,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g several that c<strong>an</strong> be identified specifically as Nortwestern <strong>Indo</strong>-Ary<strong>an</strong> or even<br />

“Dardic.” The ones Turner (1926: 156, 174) explicitly mentions are reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong><br />

<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> as štár ‘four’, šó ‘six’ <strong>an</strong>d murš ‘m<strong>an</strong>, male’. However, as Matras (2002: 47)<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts out, the lexical evidence for the Northwestern contact <strong>of</strong> Proto-<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> is<br />

“marg<strong>in</strong>al <strong>an</strong>d largely <strong>in</strong>conclusive.” Indeed, Turner (1962–6: 742–743) himself appears<br />

to have later revised his Dardic hypothesis regard<strong>in</strong>g the orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> numeral<br />

‘six’, deriv<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>stead from a separate Old <strong>Indo</strong>-Ary<strong>an</strong> form, <strong>an</strong>d he no more<br />

mentions the possible Dardic orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> the other <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> forms.<br />

3.4. Contact with Middle-Eastern l<strong>an</strong>guages<br />

While hypotheses about the time <strong>of</strong> the out-migration <strong>of</strong> Proto-<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> speakers from<br />

India vary tremendously, r<strong>an</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g between the fourth century BCE <strong>an</strong>d the eleventh<br />

century CE, Matras’ (2002: 18) suggestion that the <strong>an</strong>cestors <strong>of</strong> the Roms left the<br />

Elšík <strong>Lo<strong>an</strong>words</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> 8 <strong>of</strong> 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!