07.04.2013 Views

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dist<strong>in</strong>ction is actually shared <strong>in</strong> the community) rema<strong>in</strong> to be <strong>in</strong>vestigated, it seems that<br />

lo<strong>an</strong>words from Hungari<strong>an</strong> that are used across all generations <strong>an</strong>d regularly employed<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> discourse are not considered to be lo<strong>an</strong>words. Though they are referred to as<br />

“Hungari<strong>an</strong> words” <strong>in</strong> some contexts, <strong>in</strong> other contexts the speakers describe them as<br />

“proper <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> words.” This appropriation strategy is likely to be l<strong>in</strong>ked to the<br />

speakers’ toler<strong>an</strong>ce for lexical borrow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

There are few productive onomasiological processes with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> <strong>an</strong>d the<br />

l<strong>an</strong>guage relies heavily on lo<strong>an</strong>words <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g new nam<strong>in</strong>g units, especially <strong>in</strong> nouns.<br />

Unlike some <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> varieties that employ <strong>in</strong>ternal word-formation processes to create a<br />

layer <strong>of</strong> secret vocabulary <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> sem<strong>an</strong>tic doma<strong>in</strong>s (cf. Matras 2002: 223), <strong>Selice</strong><br />

<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> does not seem to avoid lo<strong>an</strong>words <strong>in</strong> these doma<strong>in</strong>s. For example, while <strong>in</strong><br />

most <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> varieties the regular word for ‘policem<strong>an</strong>’ is a <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>-<strong>in</strong>ternal formation<br />

that is not comprehensible to outsiders, it is a lo<strong>an</strong>word from Hungari<strong>an</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong><br />

<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>: čendéri < csendőr ‘gendarm’. 25<br />

6. Grammatical borrow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> has been affected by grammatical borrow<strong>in</strong>g to a great extent. 26 Due to<br />

space limitations I will only present a very brief summary here (see Elšík 2007+, for a<br />

more detailed overview). Several types <strong>of</strong> grammatical borrow<strong>in</strong>g are dist<strong>in</strong>guished<br />

below. First, <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> has borrowed various k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> contact l<strong>an</strong>guage function<br />

words, only some <strong>of</strong> which are represented <strong>in</strong> the LWT sample. Next, there are a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> borrowed affixes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>. (I dist<strong>in</strong>guish between affix copy<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

which is the direct tr<strong>an</strong>sfer <strong>of</strong> contact l<strong>an</strong>guage affixes without the mediation <strong>of</strong> lexical<br />

borrow<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>an</strong>d affix extraction, which consists <strong>in</strong> importation <strong>of</strong> contact l<strong>an</strong>guage<br />

affixes with<strong>in</strong> morphologically complex lo<strong>an</strong>words <strong>an</strong>d their subsequent <strong>an</strong>alogical<br />

extension to bases that do not orig<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong> the source l<strong>an</strong>guage <strong>of</strong> the affixes.) F<strong>in</strong>ally,<br />

<strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> frequently replicates source l<strong>an</strong>guage morphosyntactic patterns<br />

25 To my knowledge only two related nouns, the mascul<strong>in</strong>e čačuno <strong>an</strong>d fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e čačuni (derivations <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>in</strong>digenous adjective čáčo ‘true’), serve cryptolalic functions <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>: they may be used to<br />

refer to <strong>an</strong>y hum<strong>an</strong> referent <strong>in</strong> situations when the referent <strong>an</strong>d/or by-st<strong>an</strong>ders are not supposed to<br />

underst<strong>an</strong>d that the referent is be<strong>in</strong>g talked about.<br />

26 <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>, together with Guar<strong>an</strong>i, shows the greatest extent <strong>of</strong> grammatical borrow<strong>in</strong>g among the<br />

25 l<strong>an</strong>guages <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> a recent cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic survey (Matras & Sakel, 2007+), exhibit<strong>in</strong>g some k<strong>in</strong>d<br />

<strong>of</strong> contact <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong> 31 out <strong>of</strong> 36 prom<strong>in</strong>ent structural doma<strong>in</strong>s (Matras, 2007+).<br />

Elšík <strong>Lo<strong>an</strong>words</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> 29 <strong>of</strong> 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!