Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...
Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...
Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
South Slavic, világ-o ‘world’ from Hungari<strong>an</strong>, <strong>an</strong>d pepš-o ‘black pepper’ from Czech)<br />
take the borrowed nom<strong>in</strong>ative plural suffix -i <strong>an</strong>d the reshaped oblique s<strong>in</strong>gular suffix<br />
-os-. Other <strong>in</strong>flectional classes show different markers, but the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple rema<strong>in</strong>s the<br />
same.<br />
Similarly, pre-Greek <strong>an</strong>d early Greek lo<strong>an</strong>-verbs show full morphological<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>an</strong>d are structurally <strong>in</strong>dist<strong>in</strong>guishable from <strong>in</strong>digenous verbs. Post-Greek<br />
lo<strong>an</strong>-verbs, on the other h<strong>an</strong>d, are marked out by <strong>an</strong> overt (<strong>an</strong>d dedicated) adaptation<br />
marker, the Greek-orig<strong>in</strong> suffix -<strong>in</strong>-, which is added to <strong>an</strong> <strong>in</strong>flectional stem <strong>of</strong> the source<br />
verb (e.g. vič-<strong>in</strong>- ‘to shout’ from Serbo-Croati<strong>an</strong> vič-, dógoz-<strong>in</strong>- ‘to work’ from<br />
Hungari<strong>an</strong> dolgoz-), <strong>an</strong>d followed by regular <strong>in</strong>digenous <strong>in</strong>flections. The suffix, which<br />
is a pre-<strong>in</strong>flectional though non-derivational morpheme, was extracted from lexical<br />
borrow<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Greek verbs with the present stem <strong>in</strong> -<strong>in</strong>-. Though none <strong>of</strong> these have<br />
been reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>, the suffix has been extended to those Greek lo<strong>an</strong>-verbs<br />
that orig<strong>in</strong>ally conta<strong>in</strong>ed a different suffix, e.g. rum-<strong>in</strong>- ‘to destroy, break, damage,<br />
spoil’ from Greek rim-az- ‘to ravage’. Dialect comparison suggests that the suffix -<strong>in</strong>-<br />
was orig<strong>in</strong>ally specialized for non-perfective adaptation <strong>of</strong> some tr<strong>an</strong>sitive lo<strong>an</strong>-verbs <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> (Matras 2002: 130). In <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>, however, it has developed <strong>in</strong>to a<br />
general, aspect- <strong>an</strong>d valency-neutral, verb-adaptation marker. 20 Nonce lo<strong>an</strong>-verbs from<br />
Slovak or Czech show a dist<strong>in</strong>ct pattern <strong>of</strong> morphological adaptation: their <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itive<br />
stems get adapted by the Hungari<strong>an</strong>-orig<strong>in</strong> adaptation suffix -ál-, 21 <strong>in</strong> addition to the<br />
regular adaptation suffix -<strong>in</strong>-, e.g. sledov-ál-<strong>in</strong>- ‘to observe, follow’ from Slovak/Czech<br />
sled-ov-a-.<br />
In adjectives, the dist<strong>in</strong>ction between xenoclitic <strong>an</strong>d oikoclitic <strong>in</strong>flection, which<br />
is attested <strong>in</strong> most <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> dialects <strong>an</strong>d reconstructable for Early <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> (e.g. Boretzky<br />
& Igla 2004: 112–113), has been lost due to <strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>an</strong>alogical developments <strong>in</strong> all<br />
South Central dialects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> (cf. Elšík et al. 1999: 334,<br />
Elšík & Matras 2006: 329). All borrowed adjectives – i.e. not only those borrowed from<br />
<strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>’s pre-Greek contact l<strong>an</strong>guages – now <strong>in</strong>flect exactly like <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />
adjectives <strong>an</strong>d employ the former oikoclitic <strong>in</strong>flectional suffixes. In lo<strong>an</strong>words from pre-<br />
20 The Greek-orig<strong>in</strong> suffix *-(V)s-, which appears to have been the marker <strong>of</strong> perfective adaptation <strong>of</strong> all<br />
lo<strong>an</strong>-verbs <strong>an</strong>d <strong>of</strong> non-perfective adaptation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>t<strong>an</strong>sitive lo<strong>an</strong>-verbs (Matras 2002: 130), has acquired<br />
novel functions <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> (cf. Elšík 2007+).<br />
21 Although Kenesei, Vago, <strong>an</strong>d Fenyvesi (1998: 357–358) describe the Hungari<strong>an</strong> suffix -ál- as a de-<br />
nom<strong>in</strong>al verb-deriv<strong>in</strong>g marker, their examples show that it is <strong>in</strong> fact a verb-adapt<strong>in</strong>g suffix, which is<br />
synchronically dist<strong>in</strong>ct from the de-nom<strong>in</strong>al verb-deriv<strong>in</strong>g suffix -(V)l.<br />
Elšík <strong>Lo<strong>an</strong>words</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> 26 <strong>of</strong> 65