07.04.2013 Views

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

Loanwords in Selice Romani, an Indo-Aryan language of Slovakia 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

with one middle-age female speaker <strong>an</strong>d with people, <strong>of</strong> both genders <strong>an</strong>d different<br />

generations, from with<strong>in</strong> her extended family. Thus, the variety <strong>of</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong><br />

described here represents a familiolect rather th<strong>an</strong> the local dialect <strong>of</strong> the Hungari<strong>an</strong><br />

Roms <strong>in</strong> general. This is import<strong>an</strong>t to stress, as it seems that the <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> lexicon<br />

shows signific<strong>an</strong>t variation across different groups <strong>of</strong> speakers, especially with regard to<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> lo<strong>an</strong>words from Hungari<strong>an</strong>. 5 In addition to her native l<strong>an</strong>guage, my ma<strong>in</strong><br />

consult<strong>an</strong>t speaks Hungari<strong>an</strong>, Slovak <strong>an</strong>d Czech fluently, <strong>an</strong>d she has some basic<br />

competence <strong>in</strong> Russi<strong>an</strong>. While a great m<strong>an</strong>y <strong>of</strong> the LWT lexemes have been acquired<br />

through <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong>of</strong> spont<strong>an</strong>eous narratives <strong>an</strong>d conversations, all <strong>of</strong> these have been re-<br />

checked with my consult<strong>an</strong>ts. A signific<strong>an</strong>t part <strong>of</strong> the LWT lexemes, a third or so, stem<br />

from direct lexical elicitation.<br />

M<strong>an</strong>y Early <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> etymologies, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those <strong>of</strong> pre-split lo<strong>an</strong>words, have<br />

been discussed at least <strong>in</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the previous lexical <strong>an</strong>d/or etymological studies on<br />

<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> (e.g. Pott 1844–5, Ascoli 1865, Miklosich 1872–1881, Sampson 1926, Wolf<br />

1960, Valtonen 1972, Vekerdi 1983 [2000], Soravia 1988, Boretzky & Igla 1994,<br />

Mānuš 1994, Mānušs et al. 1997, Tálos 1999). Several publications on <strong>in</strong>dividual layers<br />

<strong>of</strong> lexical borrow<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>to <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> are mentioned <strong>in</strong> Section 3. I have drawn especially<br />

on two sound sources, Boretzky & Igla 1994 (cf. Kostov 1996, Matras 1996) <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Mānušs et al. 1997 (cf. Bakker 1999), <strong>in</strong> etymologiz<strong>in</strong>g pre-split lo<strong>an</strong>words <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong><br />

<strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>, while most etymologies <strong>of</strong> post-split lo<strong>an</strong>words, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g all etymologies <strong>of</strong><br />

lo<strong>an</strong>words from Hungari<strong>an</strong>, Slovak <strong>an</strong>d Czech, are my own. F<strong>in</strong>ally, I have consulted<br />

several publications (Beníšek 2006; Buck 1949; Burrow & Emeneau 1960, 1984; Kuiper<br />

1948, 1991; Lubotsky 2001; Mayrh<strong>of</strong>er 1986–2001; Turner 1962–6; Witzel 1999a,<br />

1999b, 1999c) <strong>in</strong> order to identify lo<strong>an</strong>words <strong>in</strong>to the Old <strong>Indo</strong>-Ary<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d earlier stages<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>, which, for obvious reasons, have hardly ever been considered <strong>in</strong><br />

etymological studies on <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong>.<br />

3. Contact situations<br />

<strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> <strong>an</strong>d its <strong>an</strong>cestor varieties have come <strong>in</strong>to contact with a number <strong>of</strong><br />

different l<strong>an</strong>guages <strong>in</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> contact situations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> all likelihood l<strong>an</strong>guage<br />

shift (see Section 3.2). This section is structured chronologically <strong>in</strong>to periods<br />

5 On the other h<strong>an</strong>d, <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> exhibits a great degree <strong>of</strong> homogeneity as far as its morphosyntax <strong>an</strong>d<br />

phonology is concerned.<br />

Elšík <strong>Lo<strong>an</strong>words</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Selice</strong> <strong>Rom<strong>an</strong>i</strong> 4 <strong>of</strong> 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!