Observations and Modelling of Fronts and Frontogenesis
Observations and Modelling of Fronts and Frontogenesis
Observations and Modelling of Fronts and Frontogenesis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
y 51/2 <strong>and</strong> io1/2, respectively. The distance between the<br />
two fronts is roughly l.5Al2 or 3X23 in each case.<br />
Upper layer characteristics for Case 1 are displayed in<br />
Figure III.5a. The fronts move along these characteristics<br />
with very little change in form. The velocity v1(y,t) is<br />
just the inverse slope <strong>of</strong> the characteristics in Figure<br />
III.5a. The increase in <strong>of</strong>fshore velocity near the coast<br />
associated with the upwelling event at t 8.1 is visible as<br />
a decrease in slope <strong>of</strong> the characteristics. As the front<br />
propagates <strong>of</strong>fshore, the spreading <strong>of</strong> characteristics on its<br />
inshore side illustrates the divergence in the mixed layer.<br />
The characteristics may be interpreted as the y-components <strong>of</strong><br />
particle paths. The x-components must be obtained by time-<br />
integrating the geostrophic velocities.<br />
The characteristics in layer 2 are shown in Fig III.5b.<br />
They bend slightly as the front passes over them <strong>and</strong> the<br />
local divergence momentarily alters the layer 2 velocity near<br />
the front. They are drawn toward y with increasing rapidity<br />
as they approach The characteristics in layer 3 are<br />
shown in Figure III.5c. They show a nearly uniform<br />
convergence toward the coastal boundary.<br />
111.4 Summary<br />
We have formulated analytically a semigeostrophic model<br />
for thermocline upwelling at a coastal boundary <strong>and</strong> solved<br />
72