01.06.2013 Views

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

method achieves this by us<strong>in</strong>g maximum likelihood, penalized by roughness<br />

penalties for each of the curves, as described <strong>in</strong> §12.2.<br />

Although the approach of Cole and Green is attractive <strong>in</strong>asmuch as some<br />

arbitrary features of the orig<strong>in</strong>al LMS method have been removed or made more<br />

systematic, the result<strong>in</strong>g curves are more complicated to describe <strong>in</strong> a succ<strong>in</strong>ct<br />

mathematical form and this may be a limitation <strong>in</strong> some applications. Alternative<br />

methods us<strong>in</strong>g a similar approach, namely transform<strong>in</strong>g data to normality<br />

and smooth<strong>in</strong>g the dependence on age, are emerg<strong>in</strong>g. Royston and Wright (1998)<br />

describe a method which makes use of fractional polynomials.<br />

Distribution-free methods<br />

The LMS method and other methods mentioned hitherto determ<strong>in</strong>e percentiles<br />

on the basis that the data, perhaps after transformation, have a given distributional<br />

form, usually the normal distribution. The percentiles are then computed<br />

by substitut<strong>in</strong>g estimates of parameters <strong>in</strong>to the expression for the percentiles<br />

derived from the form of the distribution. If the data do not have this distribution<br />

and if the transformation fails to make them have this distribution, then the<br />

derived percentiles may be wrong. In view of this, some statisticians may prefer<br />

an approach which does not make such assumptions.<br />

One class of methods is based around the observation that the value of u<br />

which m<strong>in</strong>imizes the mean deviation<br />

1<br />

n<br />

P n<br />

iˆ1<br />

jxi uj<br />

over a sample x1, ..., xn is the sample median. This result can be extended; the<br />

100pth percentile can be found by m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1<br />

n<br />

P n<br />

iˆ1<br />

‰…1 p†jxi uj‡…2p 1†…xi u† ‡ Š,<br />

12.3 Reference ranges 403<br />

where z ‡ ˆ maxfz,0g. The method can be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e age-related percentiles<br />

by allow<strong>in</strong>g u to be a function of age. Details are <strong>in</strong> Koenker and Bassett<br />

(1978), with further work <strong>in</strong> Newey and Powell (1987). This method seems to<br />

have been little used <strong>in</strong> medical applications.<br />

Another approach altogether is described by Healy et al. (1988) and it will be<br />

convenient to refer to this method as the HRY (Healy, Rasbash and Yang)<br />

method. In this model the median is described by a pth-order polynomial <strong>in</strong> age,<br />

where p is chosen by the statistician on the basis of the data. For illustrative purposes,<br />

suppose p ˆ 1 and the median at age t is a0 ‡ a1t. If the data actually follow<br />

a normal distribution, then this will also be the mean. Furthermore, if the standard<br />

deviation, s, does not change with age, then the ith percentile can be written as:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!