01.06.2013 Views

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

588 Survival analysis<br />

McGilchrist and Aisbett (1991) considered recurrence times to <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong><br />

patients on kidney dialysis. Follow<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>fection a patient is treated and, when<br />

the <strong>in</strong>fection is cleared, put back on dialysis. Thus a patient may have more than<br />

one <strong>in</strong>fection so the events are not <strong>in</strong>dependent; some patients may be more<br />

likely to have an <strong>in</strong>fection than others and, <strong>in</strong> general, it is useful to consider<br />

that, <strong>in</strong> addition to the covariates that may <strong>in</strong>fluence the hazard rate, each<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual has an unknown tendency to become <strong>in</strong>fected, referred to as the<br />

frailty. The concept of frailty may be extended to any situation where observations<br />

on survival may not be <strong>in</strong>dependent. For example, <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> families<br />

may share a tendency for long or short survival because of their common genes,<br />

or household members because of a common environment. Subjects <strong>in</strong> the same<br />

family or the same environment would have a common value for their frailty.<br />

The proportional hazards model (17.25) is modified to<br />

or, equivalently, to<br />

l…t, xik† ˆl0…t†exp…b T xik†exp…sfi†<br />

l…t, xik† ˆl0…t†exp…b T xik ‡ sfi†, …17:28†<br />

where i represents a group shar<strong>in</strong>g a common value of the frailty, fi, and k a<br />

subject with<strong>in</strong> the group. The parameter s expresses the strength of the frailty<br />

effect on the hazard function. Of course, the frailties, fi, are unobservable and<br />

there will usually be <strong>in</strong>sufficient data with<strong>in</strong> each group to estimate the frailties<br />

for each group separately. The situation is ak<strong>in</strong> to that discussed <strong>in</strong> §12.5 and the<br />

approach is to model the frailties as a set of random effects, <strong>in</strong> terms of a<br />

distributional form. The whole data set can then be used to estimate the parameters<br />

of this distribution as well as the regression coefficients for the covariates.<br />

McGilchrist and Aisbett (1991) fitted a log-normal distribution to the frailties<br />

but other distributional forms may be used. For a fuller discussion, see Kle<strong>in</strong> and<br />

Moeschberger (1997, Chapter 13). The situation is similar to those where empirical<br />

Bayesian methods may be employed (§6.5) and the frailty estimates are<br />

shrunk towards the mean. This approach is similar to that given by Clayton<br />

and Cuzick (1985), and Clayton (1991) discusses the problem <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

Bayesian <strong>in</strong>ference.<br />

17.9 Diagnostic methods<br />

Plots of the survival aga<strong>in</strong>st time, usually with some transformation of one or<br />

both of these items, are useful for check<strong>in</strong>g on the distribution of the hazard. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated or cumulative hazard, def<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />

H…t† ˆ<br />

… t<br />

0<br />

l…u† du ˆ ln S…t†, …17:29†

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!