01.06.2013 Views

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Study start<br />

year, code<br />

and name<br />

Deaths/patients Ablation deaths Annual odds of death<br />

Ovarian<br />

ablation<br />

(a) Ovarian ablation <strong>in</strong> the absence of cytotoxics<br />

57A<br />

64A<br />

65B<br />

68B<br />

71A<br />

74J2<br />

Subtotal (a)*<br />

(b) Ovarian ablation <strong>in</strong> the presence of cytotoxics<br />

74J2 Bradford RI<br />

78B 2 + 3 Toronto−Edmonton<br />

78G1 CCABC Vancouver<br />

78K2 Ludwig II<br />

79B2 SWOG 7827 B<br />

Subtotal (b)<br />

Norwegian RH<br />

Saskatchewan CF<br />

PMH Toronto<br />

Ontario CTRF<br />

CRFB Caen A<br />

Bradford RI<br />

Total (a + b)*<br />

24/68<br />

49/143<br />

133/216<br />

5/6<br />

1/1<br />

5/22<br />

3/21<br />

35/116<br />

14/57<br />

69/139<br />

18/145<br />

Control<br />

group<br />

43/83<br />

56/112<br />

96/133*<br />

3/3<br />

0/0<br />

5/20<br />

217/456 250/422<br />

3/17<br />

33/119<br />

15/52<br />

84/142<br />

25/131<br />

O − E Variance<br />

of O − E<br />

−8 . 7<br />

−11 . 0<br />

−11 . 2<br />

1 . 0<br />

−0 . 3<br />

−30 . 1<br />

−0 . 4<br />

0 . 5<br />

−1 . 6<br />

−9 . 6<br />

−3 . 6<br />

90 . 8<br />

139/478 160/461 −14 . 7 68 . 4<br />

356/934<br />

(38 . 1%)<br />

410/883<br />

(46 . 4%)<br />

14 . 2<br />

24 . 6<br />

48 . 0<br />

1 . 6<br />

2 . 4<br />

1 . 4<br />

15 . 7<br />

6 . 7<br />

34 . 4<br />

10 . 2<br />

−44 . 8 15 9 . 3<br />

99% or 95% limits<br />

Test for heterogeneity: χ<br />

Test for <strong>in</strong>teraction (a) vs (b):<br />

*For balance, controls from 65B2 count twice just <strong>in</strong> totals of deaths/patients.<br />

2<br />

9<br />

χ 2<br />

= 5<br />

1<br />

. 4; p > 0 . 1; NS.<br />

= 0 . 5; p > 0 . 1; NS.<br />

Ratio (and<br />

confidence limits),<br />

ablation : control<br />

Ablation better<br />

Reduction<br />

(% and SD)<br />

0 0 . 5 1 . 1 5<br />

2<br />

Ablation worse<br />

Treatment effect 2p = 0 . 0004<br />

28%, SD 9<br />

19%, SD 11<br />

25%, SD 7<br />

Fig. 18.2 A meta-analysis of mortality results from trials of ovarian ablation <strong>in</strong> women with early breast cancer below age 50, subdivided by the presence or<br />

absence of cytotoxic chemotherapy (Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group, 1992, Fig. 9). In this presentation the area of a black square is<br />

proportional to Vi, and thus represents the precision of the estimate from that trial or group of trials. The significance level for a two-sided test is shown as `2p'.<br />

Reproduced by permission of the authors and publishers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!