01.06.2013 Views

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

Statistical Methods in Medical Research 4ed

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

678 <strong>Statistical</strong> methods <strong>in</strong> epidemiology<br />

Example 19.6<br />

Table 19.5 summarizes results from 10 retrospective surveys <strong>in</strong> which patients with lung<br />

cancer and control subjects were classified as smokers or non-smokers. In most or all of<br />

these surveys, cases and controls would have been matched, but the orig<strong>in</strong>al data are<br />

usually not presented <strong>in</strong> sufficient detail to enable relative risks to be estimated from<br />

(19.26) and match<strong>in</strong>g is ignored <strong>in</strong> the present analysis. (The effect of ignor<strong>in</strong>g match<strong>in</strong>g<br />

when it is present is, if anyth<strong>in</strong>g, to underestimate the departure of the relative risk from<br />

unity.) The data were compiled by Cornfield (1956) and have been referred to also by Gart<br />

(1962).<br />

Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g wi as the reciprocal of var(ln ^c i) from (4.26), the weighted mean is<br />

P wi ln ^c i<br />

P wi<br />

ˆ<br />

161 36<br />

ˆ 1 531,<br />

105 4<br />

and the pooled estimate of c is exp(1 531) ˆ 4 62.<br />

For the heterogeneity test (8.15), the x2 …9† statistic is<br />

P<br />

wi…ln ^c i† 2 … P wi ln ^c i† 2<br />

P ˆ 253 678 247 061 ˆ 6 62 …P ˆ 0 68†:<br />

wi<br />

There is no strong evidence of heterogeneity between separate estimates. It is, of course,<br />

likely that the relative risk varies to some extent from study to study, particularly as the<br />

factor `smok<strong>in</strong>g' covers such a wide range of activity. However, the sampl<strong>in</strong>g variation of<br />

the separate estimates is evidently too large to enable such real variation to emerge. If we<br />

assume that all the variation is due to sampl<strong>in</strong>g error, the variance of the weighted mean<br />

of ln ^c i can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />

1<br />

P ˆ 0 00949:<br />

wi<br />

Approximate 95% confidence limits for ln c are<br />

p<br />

1 531 …1 96† 0 00949 ˆ 1 340 and 1 722:<br />

The correspond<strong>in</strong>g limits for c are obta<strong>in</strong>ed by exponentials as 3 82 and 5 60.<br />

The Mantel±Haenszel estimator of c is<br />

302 840<br />

RMH ˆ ˆ 4 68:<br />

64 687<br />

The statistic for test<strong>in</strong>g that this estimate differs from unity is<br />

X 2 MH ˆ…3793 3554 85†2 =193 17<br />

ˆ 293 60 …P < 0 001†:<br />

The test-based method of calculat<strong>in</strong>g confidence limits from (19.23) gives<br />

p<br />

SE…ln RMH† ˆln…4 68†= 293 60<br />

ˆ 1 543=17 13<br />

ˆ 0 0901,<br />

and approximate 95% confidence limits for ln c are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!