Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

102 References 191. Otte DI. Patients perspectives and experiences of day case surgery. J Adv Nurs 1996;23:1228–37. 192. Ratcliffe F, Lawson R, Millar J. Day-case laparoscopy revisited: have post-operative morbidity and patient acceptance improved? Health Trend 1994;26:47–9. 193. Rhodes SP. A follow-up of patients after day care cataract operations. J One-Day Surg 1991; Autumn:16–20. 194. Rudkin GE, Bacon AK, Burrow B, Chapman MH, Claxton M, Donovan B, et al. Review of efficiencies and patient satisfaction in Australian and New Zealand day surgery units: a pilot study. Anaesth Intens Care 1996;24:74–8. 195. Luntz SP, Janitz E, Motsch J, Martin E, Boettiger BW. Patient comfort and use of personnel resource assessments are similar for sevoflurane and propofol in the maintenance of anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2000;70:S159. 196. Tong D, Chung F, Wong D. Predictive factors in global and anesthesia satisfaction in ambulatory surgical patients. Anesthesiology 1997;87:856–64. 197. Tzabar Y, Asbury AJ, Millar K. Cognitive failures after general anaesthesia for day-case surgery. Br J Anaesth 1996;76:194–7. 198. Winwood MA. Anxiety levels following anaesthesia for day-case surgery. Anaesthesia 1993;48:581–4. 199. Grenier B, Dubreuil M, Siao D, Meyman Y. Paediatric day case anaesthesia: estimate of its quality at home. Paediatr Anaesthesia 1998;8:485–9. 200. Joliffe DM. An audit of paediatric day case surgery in a district general hospital. Paediatr Anaesthesia 1997;7:317–23. 201. Kotiniemi LH, Ryhane PT, Moilane IK. Behavioural changes following routine ENT operations in twoto-ten year old children. Paediatr Anaesthesia 1996;6:45–9. 202. Kotiniemi LH, Ryhanen PT, Moilanen IK. Behavioural changes in children following day-case surgery: a 4 week follow-up of 551 children. Anaesthesia 1997;52:970–6. 203. Payne KA, Coetzee AR, Mattheyse FJ, Heydenrych JJ. Behavioural changes in children following minor surgery – is premedication beneficial? Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1992;43:173–9. 204. Scaife JM, Campbell I. A comparison of the outcome of day-care and inpatient treatment of paediatric surgical cases. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1988;29:185–98. 205. Selby IR, Rigg JD, Faragher B, Morgan RJ, Watt TC, Morris P. The incidence of minor sequelae following anaesthesia in children. Paediatr Anaesthesia 1996;6:293–302. 206. Sikich N, Carr AS, Lerman J. Parental perceptions expectations and preferences for the postanaesthetic recovery of children. Paediatr Anaesthesia 1997;7:139–42. 207. Tarbell SE, Cohen IT, Marsh JL. The Toddler– Preschooler Postoperative Pain Scale: an observational scale for measuring postoperative pain in children aged 1–5. Preliminary report. Pain 1992;50:273–80. 208. Vernon DTA, Schulman JL, Foley JM. Changes in children’s behavior after hospitalization. Am J Disab Child 1966;3:581–93. 209. Westerling D. Postoperative recovery evaluated with a new, tactile scale (TaS) in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery. Pain 1999;83:297–301. 210. Wilson GAM, Doyle E. Validation of three paediatric pain scores for use by parents. Anaesthesia 1996;51:1005–7. 211. Dexter F, Tinker JH. Analysis of strategies to decrease post anesthesia care unit costs. Anesthesiology 1995;82:94–101. 212. Fleischmann E, Akca O, Wallner T, Arkilic CF, Kurz A, Hickle RS, et al. Onset time, recovery duration, and drug cost with four different methods of inducing general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1999;88:930–5. 213. Halberg DL, Russell WR, Hatton RC, Segal R, Guyton TS, Paulu DA. Ambulatory care: pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anesthesia in ambulatory surgery: comparison of desflurane to isoflurane and propofol. Pharm Pract Manag Q 1996;16:71–85. 214. Hsu SHL, Shalansky SJ. Pharmacoeconomics of propofol versus thiopental for induction of anaesthesia in short procedures. Can J Hosp Pharm 1995;48:208–13. 215. Kain ZN, Gaal D, Kain TS, Jaeger DD, Rimar S. A first-pass cost analysis of propofol versus barbiturates for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 1994;79:1102–6. 216. Kurpiers EMC, Scharine J, Lovell SL. Cost-effective anesthesia: desflurane versus propofol in outpatient surgery. J Am Assoc Nurse Anesthet 1996;64:69–75. 217. Meyer-McCright A, Hofer RE, Tarhan S. Study of direct variable anesthesia costs in the dilation and curettage patient. J Am Assoc Nurse Anesthet 1998;66:385–9. 218. Patel N, Smith CE, Pinchak AC, Sidhu T, Morscher A, Podugu RR, et al. Desflurane is not associated with faster operating room exit times in outpatients. J Clin Anesth 1996;8:130–5. 219. Reis CR, Azmudeh A, Franciosi LG, Schwarz SKW, MacLeod BA. Cost comparison of sevoflurane with isoflurane anesthesia in arthroscopic menisectomy surgery. Can J Anaesth 1999;46:1088–13.
220. Rosenberg KM, Bridge P, Brown M. Cost comparison: a desflurane- versus a propofol-based general anesthetic technique. Anesth Analg 1994;79:852–5. 221. Smith I, Terhoeve PA, Hennart D, Feiss P, Harmer M, Pourriat JL, et al. A multicentre comparison of the costs of anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol. Br J Anaesth 1999;83:564–70. 222. Sun R, Watcha MF, White PF, Skrivanek GD, Griffin JD, Stool L, et al. A cost comparison of methohexital and propofol for ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1999;89:311–16. 223. Wagner BKJ, O’Hara DA. Cost analysis of propofol versus thiopental induction anesthesia in outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Clin Ther 1995;17:770–6. 224. Wagner BKJ, O’Hara DA. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of sevoflurane versus isoflurane anesthesia in elective ambulatory surgery. Pharmacoeconomics 1997;17:1006–10. 225. Pastuovic L, Cohen ME, Burton RG. Propofol: an alternative general anaesthetic for outpatient oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:943–8. 226. Rieker LB, Rieker MP. A comparison of the recovery times of desflurane and isoflurane in outpatient anesthesia. J Am Assoc Nurse Anesthet 1998;66:183–6. 227. Santawat U, Lertakyamanee J, Svasdi-Xuto O. Recovery after total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol and inhalation anesthesia (IA) using halothane in day case surgery. J Med Assoc Thai 1999;82:770–7. 228. MacKeigan L, Larson L. Development and validation of an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with pharmacy services. Med Care 1999;27:522–36. 229. Bartamian M, Meyer DR. Site of service, anesthesia and operative practice patterns for oculoplastic and orbital surgeries. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1628–33. 230. Thoms GMM, McHugh GA, Pollard BJ, Moore J. Anaesthesia clinical directors in the UK: organisation, objectives and support needs. Anaesthesia 1999;54:753–60. 231. Klose T. The contingent valuation method in health care. Health Policy 1999;47:97–123. 232. O’Brien B, Gafni A. When do the ‘dollars’ make sense? Towards a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care. Med Decis Making 1996;16:288–99. 233. Reardon G, Pathak D. Contingent valuation of pharmaceuticals and pharmacy services: methodological considerations. J Soc Admin Pharm 1989;6:83–92. © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2002. All rights reserved. Health Technology Assessment 2002; Vol. 6: No. 30 234. Diener A, O’Brien B, Gafni A. Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Econom 1998;7:313–26. 235. US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Reg 1993;58:4602–14. 236. Neumann PJ, Johannesson M. The willingness to pay for in vitro fertilization: a pilot study using contingent valuation. Med Care 1994;32:686–99. 237. Johannesson M, Aberg H, Agreus L, Borgquist L, Jonsson B. Cost–benefit analysis of nonpharmacological treatment of hypertension. J Intern Med 1991;230:307–12. 238. Carson RT, Mitchell RC. The issue of scope in contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econom 1993;75:1263–7. 239. Donaldson C, Farrar S, Mapp T, Walker A, Macphee S. Assessing community values in health care: is the willingness to pay method feasible? Health Care Anal 1997;5:7–29. 240. Baron J. Biases in the quantitative measurement of values for public decisions. Psychol Bull 1997;122:72–88. 241. Bryman A, Burgess RG. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. 242. Morse JM. ‘Perfectly healthy, but dead’: the myth of inter-rater reliability. Qual Health Res 1997;47:445–7. 243. OTC Directory 1999/2000. London: PAGB; 2000. 244. Netten A, Curtis L. Unit costs of health and social care. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit; 2000. 245. New earnings survey 2000. London: Office of National Statistics; 2000. 246. Audit Commission. Anaesthesia under examination. London: Audit Commission; 1997. 247. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical assessment. Lancet 1986;9:3219–36. 248. Smith G. Work measurement. Columbus: Grid; 1978. 249. Rutter PM, Brown D, Jones IF. Pharmacy research: the place of work measurement. Int J Pharm Pract 1998;6:46–58. 250. Review Body on Doctors and Dentists Remuneration. Twenty-ninth report. London: HMSO; 2000. 251. Anon. Nurses’ pay from April 1 2000. London: RCN; 2000. 252. Medical Research Council. Guidelines for good practice in clinical trials. London: MRC; 1998. 103
Page 1 and 2:
Which anaesthetic agents are costef
Page 3:
Which anaesthetic agents are costef
Page 6 and 7:
NHS R&D HTA Programme The NHS R&D H
Page 8 and 9:
Contents Appendix 6 Adult patient-b
Page 11 and 12:
Background The aim of the project w
Page 13:
• The incidence of PONV was low d
Page 16 and 17:
2 Introduction dizziness or disorie
Page 18 and 19:
4 Introduction a reduced incidence
Page 20 and 21:
6 Introduction willingness to pay f
Page 22 and 23:
8 Literature review included in the
Page 24 and 25:
10 Literature review TABLE 1 Compar
Page 26 and 27:
12 Literature review intermediate a
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
18 Literature review Patient-based
Page 34 and 35:
20 Literature review TABLE 5 contd
Page 36 and 37:
22 Literature review No studies fol
Page 38 and 39:
24 Literature review (30%) and meth
Page 40 and 41:
26 Literature review • There are
Page 42 and 43:
28 National survey of anaesthetic p
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
36 Economic evaluation methods (inc
Page 52 and 53:
38 Economic evaluation methods The
Page 54 and 55:
40 Economic evaluation methods Tabl
Page 56 and 57:
42 Economic evaluation methods simi
Page 58 and 59:
44 Economic evaluation methods Prob
Page 61 and 62:
Recruitment to the CESA RCT The stu
Page 63 and 64:
Clinical outcome data PONV by anaes
Page 65 and 66: The findings from the logistic regr
Page 67 and 68: TABLE 29 The length of stay and pri
Page 69 and 70: 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 No. of pa
Page 71 and 72: 250 200 150 100 50 0 No. of patient
Page 73 and 74: TABLE 37 Deterministic sensitivity
Page 75 and 76: 20 15 10 5 0 -5 Difference in varia
Page 77 and 78: Patient admitted for day surgery an
Page 79 and 80: 500 400 300 200 100 0 -100 -200 -30
Page 81 and 82: Recruitment to the CESA RCT The stu
Page 83 and 84: TABLE 49 The occurrence of any PONV
Page 85 and 86: 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 No. of patients
Page 87 and 88: a scale effect for scenario A, but
Page 89 and 90: The mean CVs for avoidance of PONV
Page 91 and 92: 1.80 The new variable cost and tota
Page 93 and 94: 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Su
Page 95 and 96: The structure and content of this d
Page 97 and 98: nurses to have an in-depth knowledg
Page 99 and 100: agent used (see appendix 18). It wa
Page 101 and 102: Furthermore, anaesthetists operate
Page 103 and 104: The CESA project was designed to as
Page 105: practice, such as the use of midazo
Page 109 and 110: 1. Royal College of Surgeons of Eng
Page 111 and 112: 60. Cheng KI, Chu KS, Fang YR, Su K
Page 113 and 114: 112. Raeder J, Gupta A, Pedersen FM
Page 115: 162. Viitanen H, Baer G, Annila P.
Page 119 and 120: The range of databases interrogated
Page 121: 24. preferen$.mp. [mp=title, abstra
Page 124 and 125: 110 Appendix 2 TABLE 65 contd Summa
Page 126 and 127: 112 Appendix 3 Quality assessment o
Page 166 and 167:
152 Appendix 6 TABLE 68 contd Summa
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 173 and 174:
TABLE 69 Summary of paediatric pati
Page 175 and 176:
TABLE 69 contd Summary of paediatri
Page 177 and 178:
TABLE 70 Characteristics of cost or
Page 179 and 180:
TABLE 71 Quality of cost or economi
Page 181 and 182:
TABLE 71 contd Quality of cost or e
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Abbott J, Abbott P. Psychological a
Page 191 and 192:
Hall JE, Stewart JIM, Harmer M. Sin
Page 193:
Struys M, Versichelen L, Thas O, He
Page 196 and 197:
182 Appendix 11
Page 198 and 199:
184 Appendix 11
Page 200 and 201:
186 Appendix 11
Page 202 and 203:
188 Appendix 11
Page 205 and 206:
The aim of this study was to develo
Page 207 and 208:
anaesthetics in day surgery, using
Page 209:
© Queen’s Printer and Controller
Page 213 and 214:
Background The empirical study quan
Page 215 and 216:
Satisfaction with care Nearly all (
Page 217 and 218:
TABLE 76 Reason given for preferenc
Page 219 and 220:
TABLE 79 Comparisons with previous
Page 221 and 222:
TABLE 80 Reason given for preferenc
Page 223 and 224:
TABLE 81 Reason given for willingne
Page 225 and 226:
Background Variable costs account f
Page 227 and 228:
TABLE 85 Unit costs for the purchas
Page 229 and 230:
Background The empirical study requ
Page 231 and 232:
Ethical approval This was covered b
Page 233 and 234:
20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 True weight
Page 235:
15 10 5 0 -5 -10 True weight - Dion
Page 238 and 239:
224 Appendix 19 • patients aged o
Page 241 and 242:
All staff unit costs were for the y
Page 243:
Background Fixed costs account for
Page 246 and 247:
232 Appendix 22 March, Tuesday 15 A
Page 248 and 249:
234 Appendix 23 TABLE 96 Reasons fo
Page 251 and 252:
Patients were coded using the OPCS
Page 253 and 254:
Q03.4 punch biopsy of cervix Q03.5
Page 255 and 256:
This section displays the associati
Page 257 and 258:
given in Table 103 confirm the age
Page 259:
TABLE 107 Occurrence of PONV by dur
Page 262 and 263:
248 Appendix 27 TABLE 113 Frequency
Page 265 and 266:
This section displays the associati
Page 267 and 268:
The adverse events observed in the
Page 269 and 270:
262 Health Technology Assessment Pr
Page 271:
264 Health Technology Assessment Pr
show all

Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?