02.06.2013 Views

Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...

Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...

Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

206<br />

Appendix 16<br />

“No, I felt rushed. I was in a lot of pain/discom<strong>for</strong>t –<br />

had to walk to the car. I had been told I’d be given a<br />

wheelchair” [agnfc061].<br />

Some patients (4% propofol/propofol, 5%<br />

propofol/isoflurane, 6% propofol/sevoflurane,<br />

3% sevoflurane/sevoflurane) felt they were kept in<br />

the hospital too long and felt ready to go home<br />

earlier than they did:<br />

“Yes, I did actually, I was ready be<strong>for</strong>e I went. I was<br />

held back as staff were busy” [agyfa882].<br />

‘I was ready to go earlier – waiting <strong>for</strong> discharge<br />

papers and sick note but I understood why”<br />

[agnmc169].<br />

Satisfaction with care<br />

Overall (99%), the patients were very satisfied with<br />

the care they received on the ward be<strong>for</strong>e their<br />

operation. Satisfaction with preoperative care was<br />

not dependent on the type of anaesthetic they<br />

had received. Those patients who were not happy<br />

referred to being unsettled by the wait be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

their operation:<br />

“Not really – left in recovery waiting be<strong>for</strong>e the<br />

operation on own. I was cold and alone and I got<br />

upset” [agyfs001].<br />

“There was a very long delay – about 2 hours – that<br />

was very unsettling” [agnmc010].<br />

A slightly lower proportion of patients (97%<br />

propofol/propofol, 95% propofol/isoflurane,<br />

96% propofol/sevoflurane, 98% sevoflurane/<br />

sevoflurane) were satisfied with the care they<br />

received in the recovery area after their operation.<br />

Those patients who were not happy referred to<br />

poor communication by the staff:<br />

“Not really – I was really drowsy, had to ask <strong>for</strong><br />

someone to give the diagnosis. There was poor<br />

communication from the doctors – no explanation of<br />

treatment” [agyfs001].<br />

“Yes – except the news wasn’t good but I felt it wasn’t<br />

appropriate <strong>for</strong> Mr xxx to tell me the bad news in<br />

recovery and not to see me on the ward afterwards.<br />

That’s why I felt I had to ring and clarify what was<br />

said” [agyfa1119].<br />

This patient was not happy with the level of pain<br />

control they received:<br />

“Not really no – I think there was not a lot of care –<br />

they put me on the bed and left me in pain”<br />

[agyfs055].<br />

A similar proportion of patients (96%<br />

propofol/propofol, 93% propofol/isoflurane,<br />

93% propofol/sevoflurane, 96% sevoflurane/<br />

sevoflurane) were satisfied with the care they<br />

received after their operation on the ward. Those<br />

patients who were not happy about their care<br />

made comments about the staff or the service<br />

regarding communication or discharge delays:<br />

“No, in the day ward the nurses were moaning<br />

about each other all the time, they were too busy<br />

concentrating on the next day’s work. I felt I was a<br />

nuisance” [agnfc010].<br />

“Yes OK but the doctor was very abrupt in terms of<br />

how he told me about my potential treatment and<br />

dealt with me on the ward” [agyfs062].<br />

“... bit of delay (to go home) – waiting <strong>for</strong> the tablets<br />

from pharmacy” [agyfa256].<br />

“I was left waiting <strong>for</strong> transport <strong>for</strong> 11/2 hrs because<br />

someone <strong>for</strong>got it” [agnmc027].<br />

<strong>Day</strong>s to recover after the operation<br />

The patients were asked to recall how many days<br />

it took them to recover from the operation and<br />

resume their normal activities. About 1 in 10<br />

patients (11% propofol/propofol, 12% propofol/<br />

isoflurane, 16% propofol/sevoflurane, 13%<br />

sevoflurane/sevoflurane), who were telephoned,<br />

were not able to answer this question. No difference<br />

was seen between three of the groups<br />

(propofol/propofol, propofol/isoflurane,<br />

sevoflurane/sevoflurane). On average, the patients<br />

felt it took 5 days (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.9 propofol/<br />

propofol; 95% CI, 4.3 to 5.7, propofol/isoflurane;<br />

95% CI, 4.3 to 5.9, sevoflurane/sevoflurane)<br />

<strong>for</strong> them to recover from their operation. The<br />

propofol/sevoflurane group felt it took an average<br />

of 6 days (95% CI, 5.1 to 6.9) <strong>for</strong> them to recover<br />

from their operation.<br />

Adult patients’ preferences <strong>for</strong> induction<br />

Table 80 summarises the reasons why patients<br />

would prefer the injection (medicine A) or the<br />

mask (medicine B) to send them to sleep <strong>for</strong> a<br />

future day procedure (see chapter 6 <strong>for</strong> the overall<br />

number who preferred medicine A or B).<br />

The majority of patients who preferred the<br />

injection to the mask <strong>for</strong> a future induction<br />

explained this was because they were frightened<br />

of the mask:<br />

“... because I think the injection is quicker and I can<br />

imagine wanting to kick a person holding the mask<br />

over my face, off me” [aorfc011].<br />

Patients who had had the mask in the empirical<br />

study had some concerns and were likely to prefer<br />

an injection in future:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!