Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...
Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...
Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
206<br />
Appendix 16<br />
“No, I felt rushed. I was in a lot of pain/discom<strong>for</strong>t –<br />
had to walk to the car. I had been told I’d be given a<br />
wheelchair” [agnfc061].<br />
Some patients (4% propofol/propofol, 5%<br />
propofol/isoflurane, 6% propofol/sevoflurane,<br />
3% sevoflurane/sevoflurane) felt they were kept in<br />
the hospital too long and felt ready to go home<br />
earlier than they did:<br />
“Yes, I did actually, I was ready be<strong>for</strong>e I went. I was<br />
held back as staff were busy” [agyfa882].<br />
‘I was ready to go earlier – waiting <strong>for</strong> discharge<br />
papers and sick note but I understood why”<br />
[agnmc169].<br />
Satisfaction with care<br />
Overall (99%), the patients were very satisfied with<br />
the care they received on the ward be<strong>for</strong>e their<br />
operation. Satisfaction with preoperative care was<br />
not dependent on the type of anaesthetic they<br />
had received. Those patients who were not happy<br />
referred to being unsettled by the wait be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
their operation:<br />
“Not really – left in recovery waiting be<strong>for</strong>e the<br />
operation on own. I was cold and alone and I got<br />
upset” [agyfs001].<br />
“There was a very long delay – about 2 hours – that<br />
was very unsettling” [agnmc010].<br />
A slightly lower proportion of patients (97%<br />
propofol/propofol, 95% propofol/isoflurane,<br />
96% propofol/sevoflurane, 98% sevoflurane/<br />
sevoflurane) were satisfied with the care they<br />
received in the recovery area after their operation.<br />
Those patients who were not happy referred to<br />
poor communication by the staff:<br />
“Not really – I was really drowsy, had to ask <strong>for</strong><br />
someone to give the diagnosis. There was poor<br />
communication from the doctors – no explanation of<br />
treatment” [agyfs001].<br />
“Yes – except the news wasn’t good but I felt it wasn’t<br />
appropriate <strong>for</strong> Mr xxx to tell me the bad news in<br />
recovery and not to see me on the ward afterwards.<br />
That’s why I felt I had to ring and clarify what was<br />
said” [agyfa1119].<br />
This patient was not happy with the level of pain<br />
control they received:<br />
“Not really no – I think there was not a lot of care –<br />
they put me on the bed and left me in pain”<br />
[agyfs055].<br />
A similar proportion of patients (96%<br />
propofol/propofol, 93% propofol/isoflurane,<br />
93% propofol/sevoflurane, 96% sevoflurane/<br />
sevoflurane) were satisfied with the care they<br />
received after their operation on the ward. Those<br />
patients who were not happy about their care<br />
made comments about the staff or the service<br />
regarding communication or discharge delays:<br />
“No, in the day ward the nurses were moaning<br />
about each other all the time, they were too busy<br />
concentrating on the next day’s work. I felt I was a<br />
nuisance” [agnfc010].<br />
“Yes OK but the doctor was very abrupt in terms of<br />
how he told me about my potential treatment and<br />
dealt with me on the ward” [agyfs062].<br />
“... bit of delay (to go home) – waiting <strong>for</strong> the tablets<br />
from pharmacy” [agyfa256].<br />
“I was left waiting <strong>for</strong> transport <strong>for</strong> 11/2 hrs because<br />
someone <strong>for</strong>got it” [agnmc027].<br />
<strong>Day</strong>s to recover after the operation<br />
The patients were asked to recall how many days<br />
it took them to recover from the operation and<br />
resume their normal activities. About 1 in 10<br />
patients (11% propofol/propofol, 12% propofol/<br />
isoflurane, 16% propofol/sevoflurane, 13%<br />
sevoflurane/sevoflurane), who were telephoned,<br />
were not able to answer this question. No difference<br />
was seen between three of the groups<br />
(propofol/propofol, propofol/isoflurane,<br />
sevoflurane/sevoflurane). On average, the patients<br />
felt it took 5 days (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.9 propofol/<br />
propofol; 95% CI, 4.3 to 5.7, propofol/isoflurane;<br />
95% CI, 4.3 to 5.9, sevoflurane/sevoflurane)<br />
<strong>for</strong> them to recover from their operation. The<br />
propofol/sevoflurane group felt it took an average<br />
of 6 days (95% CI, 5.1 to 6.9) <strong>for</strong> them to recover<br />
from their operation.<br />
Adult patients’ preferences <strong>for</strong> induction<br />
Table 80 summarises the reasons why patients<br />
would prefer the injection (medicine A) or the<br />
mask (medicine B) to send them to sleep <strong>for</strong> a<br />
future day procedure (see chapter 6 <strong>for</strong> the overall<br />
number who preferred medicine A or B).<br />
The majority of patients who preferred the<br />
injection to the mask <strong>for</strong> a future induction<br />
explained this was because they were frightened<br />
of the mask:<br />
“... because I think the injection is quicker and I can<br />
imagine wanting to kick a person holding the mask<br />
over my face, off me” [aorfc011].<br />
Patients who had had the mask in the empirical<br />
study had some concerns and were likely to prefer<br />
an injection in future: