Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...
Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...
Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
134<br />
Appendix 4<br />
TABLE 66 contd Summary of adult clinical outcomes studies<br />
Study Investigations and subjects Outcome Results Conclusions and<br />
measures grade of evidence<br />
Short et al.,<br />
1985,<br />
(1) Methohexitone, alfentanil, N2O, O2 (a) Time to Group 2 abandoned after Grade I<br />
122 UK (n = 20: 14 women, 6 men) open eyes 11 patients due to poor<br />
conditions during induction Method of randomisation<br />
RCT (2) Methohexitone, isoflurane, O2 (n = 20: 8 women, 3 men)<br />
(b) Time to<br />
recall date (a): (1) 9.2, (3) 9.1 min;<br />
not reported<br />
of birth p < 0.01 Not blind<br />
(3) Methohexitone, isoflurane, N2O, O2 (n = 20: 10 women, 10 men) (c) Time to (b): (1) 9.9, (3) 9.7 min; The majority of group 2<br />
recall name p < 0.01 patients were not able to<br />
N2O: given in groups 1 and 3 complete the trial<br />
(d) Post-box (c): (1) 9.5, (3) 9.6 min;<br />
Premedication: none test p < 0.01<br />
Procedures: D&C, cystourethroscopy (e) P-deletion (d): (1) 34.3, (2) 44.3, (3) 40.3;<br />
Age: > 18 years; mean (1) 45, (2) 46,<br />
test p < 0.01 group 2<br />
(3) 43 years (e): (1) 4; (2) 2; (3) 2; NS<br />
Sivalingam ASA grade I or II LMA insertion Satisfactory or excellent: (1) Grade I<br />
et al., 1999, 123<br />
(quality <strong>for</strong> 64%, (2) 64%, (3) 100%, (4)<br />
Singapore (1) Propofol 2.5 mg/kg + 10 mg induction only): 88%; p < 0.001 Method of randomisation<br />
increments i.v. (n = 25) excellent, not reported<br />
RCT satisfactory<br />
(2) Sevoflurane 8% + 60% N 2O vital or poor Open<br />
capacity breath (n = 25)<br />
(3) Sevoflurane as (2) + alfentanil<br />
5 µg/kg (n = 25)<br />
(4) Propofol as (1) + alfentanil 5 µg/kg (n = 25)<br />
N 2O: given in groups 2 and 3<br />
Premedication: none<br />
Procedures: mixed<br />
Gender: 55% men<br />
Sloan et al.,<br />
1996,<br />
Age: 16–65 years<br />
(1) Sevoflurane/sevoflurane + N2O (n = 25) (a) Open eyes (a): (1) 8.1, (2) 10.6 min Grade I<br />
124 USA<br />
(2) Isoflurane/isoflurane + N2O (n = 25) (b) Obey (b): (1) 8.0, (2) 9.9 min Method of randomisation<br />
RCT command not reported<br />
N2O: given (c): (1) 9.9, (2) 12.6 min<br />
(c) Orientation Not blind<br />
Premedication: none (d): (1) 120, (2) 133 min<br />
(d) Discharge<br />
Procedures: not reported (e): Data not given<br />
(e) DSST<br />
Age: 18–76 years No difference between groups<br />
Smith and<br />
Thwaites,<br />
(1) Sevoflurane./sevoflurane (n = 30) (a) Open eyes (a): 7.1 min; p = 0.027 Grade I<br />
1999, 125<br />
(2) Propofol TCI (n = 31) (b) Date of (b): 8.1 min; NS Method of randomisation:<br />
England birth computer-generated<br />
N2O: not given (c): 100 min; p = 0.024 random numbers<br />
RCT (c) Sit up<br />
Premedication: none<br />
(d) Walk<br />
(d): 175 min; NS Blind<br />
Procedures: mixed<br />
(e) Street fit<br />
(e): 193 min; p = 0.005<br />
Gender: 66% women<br />
Age: 18–73 years<br />
(f) PONV<br />
(f): (1) 9%; (2) 1%; p = 0.006<br />
continued