02.06.2013 Views

Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...

Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...

Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32<br />

National survey of anaesthetic practice <strong>for</strong> paediatric and adult day surgery<br />

Use of supplementary anaesthetic<br />

techniques<br />

The use of supplementary therapies and techniques<br />

<strong>for</strong> day surgery may be expected to vary<br />

from patient to patient. Estimates <strong>for</strong> the likelihood<br />

that an anaesthetist would use prophylactic<br />

anti-emetics, local anaesthetics, non-depolarising<br />

neuromuscular blocking agents, suxamethonium<br />

or laryngeal masks in a sample of the UK population<br />

of day patients were used to develop an<br />

economic model of how a patient would be<br />

anaesthetised <strong>for</strong> day surgery. Consultant anaesthetists<br />

were asked to estimate the percentage of<br />

patients in whom they would routinely use each of<br />

these therapies or techniques (Table 14). Paediatric<br />

day patients undergoing circumcision were less<br />

likely to be given a prophylactic anti-emetic than<br />

were adult day patients undergoing cystoscopy<br />

or arthroscopy. Adult day patients undergoing<br />

arthroscopy and paediatric day patients undergoing<br />

circumcision were more likely to be given<br />

a local anaesthetic. There is a small chance of<br />

day patients being given a non-depolarising<br />

neuromuscular blocking agent or suxamethonium,<br />

and a very high likelihood of them having a<br />

laryngeal mask inserted.<br />

Intraoperative analgesics<br />

In general, respondents indicated that intraoperative<br />

analgesics would be used. Respondents<br />

reported that intraoperative analgesics would not<br />

be given in 5% <strong>for</strong> urology, 1% <strong>for</strong> orthopaedics<br />

and 5% <strong>for</strong> paediatrics. The majority of respondents<br />

(73% <strong>for</strong> urology, 43% <strong>for</strong> orthopaedic,<br />

50% <strong>for</strong> paediatrics) followed the survey<br />

directions and named just one intraoperative<br />

analgesic (Table 15). The remaining respondents<br />

who answered the question named between<br />

two and four analgesics they would routinely<br />

use <strong>for</strong> urology (26%), orthopaedics (59%) and<br />

paediatrics (44%). The responses were weighted<br />

accordingly, and are shown in Table 15. The most<br />

popular combination of analgesic was fentanyl and<br />

a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID),<br />

such as diclofenac or ketorolac, which 11% of<br />

respondents said they used <strong>for</strong> urology, 31% <strong>for</strong><br />

orthopaedics and 18% <strong>for</strong> paediatrics.<br />

Of those respondents who used opioid analgesics,<br />

45% <strong>for</strong> urology, 54% <strong>for</strong> orthopaedics and 33%<br />

<strong>for</strong> paediatrics indicated they gave a prophylactic<br />

anti-emetic. Of those respondents who used nonopioid<br />

analgesics, 26% <strong>for</strong> urology, 43% <strong>for</strong><br />

orthopaedics and 26% <strong>for</strong> paediatrics indicated<br />

they gave a prophylactic anti-emetic.<br />

Treatment anti-emetics<br />

Respondents were asked to name their first- and<br />

second-line choice of anti-emetic <strong>for</strong> the treatment<br />

of PONV (Table 16). One respondent named many<br />

agents <strong>for</strong> the treatment of PONV <strong>for</strong> urology and<br />

orthopaedic patients. It was not possible to read<br />

one respondent’s named drug. These two answers<br />

were excluded from the analysis. Table 16 summarises<br />

the popularity of each type of named<br />

anti-emetic as a first- or second-line agent <strong>for</strong> this<br />

sample of anaesthetists. Cyclizine and ondansetron<br />

were favourite choices as first- or second-line<br />

treatment anti-emetics. Interestingly, a notable<br />

number (46%) of anaesthetists did not indicate a<br />

second-line anti-emetic <strong>for</strong> paediatric day patients.<br />

Implications <strong>for</strong> the<br />

empirical study<br />

This survey of anaesthetic practice generated an<br />

excellent response rate and represented the views<br />

of anaesthetists across the UK. The main areas<br />

of day-case anaesthetic practice explored were:<br />

premedication, induction, maintenance, prophylactic<br />

and treatment anti-emetics, analgesia, local<br />

anaesthesia and length of time <strong>for</strong> day procedures.<br />

The probabilities of using the named therapies <strong>for</strong><br />

TABLE 14 Likelihood of using supplementary anaesthetic techniques in the three specified clinical areas<br />

Anaesthetic Use (%) (95% CI; n)<br />

technique<br />

Urology Orthopaedics Paediatrics<br />

Prophylactic anti-emetic 32 (26.0 to 38.3; 162) 41 (34.7 to 47.0; 176) 24 (18.1 to 29.0; 159)<br />

Local anaesthetic 26 (21.1 to 31.5; 167) 77 (72.5 to 80.9; 183) 80 (75.7 to 83.8; 166)<br />

Non-depolarising<br />

neuromuscular<br />

blocking agent<br />

4 (2.3 to 5.3; 170) 6 (3.9 to 8.1; 182) 6 (4.1 to 8.0; 165)<br />

Suxamethonium 0.7 (0.4 to 1.0; 172) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.0; 184) 2.5 (1.3 to 3.7; 168)<br />

Laryngeal mask airway 86 (82.3 to 89.1; 171) 93 (91.6 to 95.1; 184) 85 (81.9 to 88.3; 166)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!