Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

178 Appendix 10 Lowry DW, Carroll MT, Mirakhur RK, Hayes A, Hughes D, O’Hare R. Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol with rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1999;54:247–52. Lubarsky DA, Smith LR, Glass PSA. A comparison of maintenance drug costs of isoflurane, desflurane, sevoflurane and propofol with OR and PACU labor costs during a 60 minute outpatient procedure. Anesthesiology 1995;83 Suppl A:S667. MacKenzie N, Grant IS. Comparison of the new emulsion formulation of propofol with methohexitone and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia in day cases. Br J Anaesth 1985;57:725–31. Manshot HJ, Meursing EE, Axt P, Byttebier GO, Erdmann W. Propofol requirements for induction of anesthesia in children of different age groups. Anesth Analg 1992;75:876–9. Margovsky A. Unplanned admissions in day-case surgery as a clinical indicator for quality assurance. Aust NZ J Surg 2000;70:216–20. Martinott R, Vassalo C, Ramaioli G, Amici DD, Marta MED. Anesthesia with sevoflurane in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 1999;9:180–2. Marudhachalam KS, Sharma K, Chari P. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for induction and recovery of anaesthesia in children. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 1996;12:185–8. McDowall RH, Scher CS, Barst SM. Total intravenous anesthesia for children undergoing brief diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. J Clin Anesth 1995;7:273–80. McWilliam J. The costs of propofol in day surgery. Anaesthesia 1989;70:866. Muir JJ, Warner MA, Offord KP, Buck CF, Harper JV, Kunkel SE. Role of nitrous oxide and other factors in postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized and blinded prospective study. Anesthesiology 1987;66:513–18. Myles PS, Hendrata M, Bennett AM, Langley M, Buckland MR. Postoperative nausea and vomiting. propofol or thiopentone: does choice of induction agent affect outcome? Anaesth Intens Care 1996;24:355–9. Ono K, Maeshima K. Comparison of the amnesic effects of propofol and isoflurane anesthesia. Anaesthesia 1998;7:848–51. Onuma OC, Bearn PE, Khan U, Mallucci P, Adiseshiah M. The influence of effective analgesia and general anaesthesia on patients’ acceptance of day case varicose vein surgery. Phlebology 1993;8:29–31. Peduto VA, Mezzetti D, Properzi M, Giorgini C. Sevoflurane provides better recovery than propofol plus fentanyl in anaesthesia for day-care surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000;17:138–43. Philip BK. Patients’ assessment of ambulatory anesthesia and surgery. J Clin Anesth 1992;4:355–8. Philip BK. New approaches to anesthesia for day case surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1997;48:167–74. Picard V, Dumont L, Pellegrini M. Quality of recovery in children: sevoflurane versus propofol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:307–10. Prasad A, Foley RJE. Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe and cost effective procedure. Eur J Surg 1996;162:43–6. Puckett SD, Andrews JJ. Sevoflurane use in veterans affairs medical centers: utility, safety, and costeffectiveness. J Am Assoc Nurse Anesthet 1997;65:136–43. Rieker LB, Rieker MP. A comparison of the recovery times of desflurane and isoflurane in outpatient anesthesia. J Am Assoc Nurse Anesthet 1998;66:183–6. Santawat U, Lertakyamanee J, Svasdi-Xuto O. Recovery after total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol and inhalation anesthesia (IA) using halothane in day case surgery. J Med Assoc Thai 1999;82:770–7. Scanlon P, Carey M, Power M, Kirby F. Response to LMA insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone. Can J Anaesth 1993;40:816–18. Seago JA, Weitz S, Walczak S. Factors influencing stay in the postanesthesia care unit: a prospective analysis. J Clin Anesth 1998;10:579–97. Serin S, Elibol O, Sungurtekin H, Gonullu M. Comparison of halothane/thiopental and propofol anesthesia for strabismus surgery. Ophthalmologica 1999;213:224–7. Siler JN, Horrow JC, Rosenberg H. Propofol reduces prolonged outpatient PACU stay – an analysis according to surgical procedure. Anesthesiol Rev 1994;21:129–32. Smith I, White P. The role of sevoflurane in outpatient anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1995;81:S67–72. Smith I, Ding Y, White P. Muscle pain after outpatient laparoscopy – influence of propofol versus thiopental and enflurane. Ambul Anesth 1993;76:1181–4. Smith I, Nathanson MH, White PF. The role of sevoflurane in outpatient anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1995;81(Suppl):S67–72. Snellen FT, Vanacker B, Van Aken H. Propofol–nitrous oxide versus thiopental sodium–isoflurane–nitrous oxide for strabismus surgery in children. J Clin Anesth 1993;5:37–41. Song D, Whitten CW, White PF, Yu SY, Zarate E. Antiemetic activity of propofol after sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia for outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology 1998;89:838–43. Standl T, Wilhelm S, Von Knobelsdorff G, Schulte am Esch J. Propofol reduces emesis after sufentanil supplemented anaesthesia in paediatric squint surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996;40:729–33.
Struys M, Versichelen L, Thas O, Herregods L, Rolly G. Comparison of computer-controlled administration of propofol with two manually controlled infusion techniques. Anaesthesia 1997;52:41–50. Sung YF. Propofol as induction and maintenance anesthesia in comparison with other intravenous or inhalational agents: economic implications. Sem Anesth 1992;11:27–8. Sung YF, Reiss N, Tillette T. The differential cost of anesthesia and recovery with propofol–nitrous oxide anesthesia versus thiopental sodium–isoflurane–nitrous oxide anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 1991;3:391–5. Suttner S, Boldt J, Schmidt C, Piper W, Kumle B. Cost analysis of target-controlled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens. Anesth Analg 1999;88:77–82. Tagliente TM. Pharmacoeconomics of propofol in anesthesia. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1997;54:1953–62. Tang J, Qi J, White PF, Wang B, Wender RH. Eltanolone as an alternative to propofol for ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1997;85:801–7. Thompson N, Robertson GS. Comparison of propofol and a propofol–methohexitone mixture for induction of day-case anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1996;77:213–16. Thompson RH, Vernon DTA. Research on children’s behaviour after hospitalization: a review and synthesis. Dev Behav Pediatr 1993;14:28–35. Thwaites A, Edmends S, Smith I. Inhalation induction with sevoflurane: a double-blind comparison with propofol. Br J Anaesth 1997;78:356–61. Thwaites AJ, Edmends S, Tomlinson AA, Kendall JB, Smith I. Double-blind comparison of sevoflurane vs propofol and succinylcholine for tracheal intubation in children. Br J Anaesth 1999;83:410–14. Ti LK, Chow MYH, Lee TL. Comparison of sevoflurane with propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. Anesth Analg 1999;88:908–12. Tzabar Y, Brydon C, Gillies WA. Induction of anaesthesia with midazolam and a target-controlled propofol infusion. Anaesthesia 1996;51:536–8. Van Den Berg AA, Savva D, Honjol NM, Prabhu NVR. Comparison of total intravenous, balanced inhalational and combined intravenous inhalational anesthesia for tympanoplasty, septorhinoplasty and adenotonsillectomy. Anaesth Intens Care 1995;23:574–82. © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2002. All rights reserved. Health Technology Assessment 2002; Vol. 6: No. 30 Van Den Berg AA, Honjol NM, Mphanza T, Rozario CJ, Joseph D. Vomiting, retching, headache and restlessness after halothane-, isoflurane- and enflurane-based anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998;42:658–63. Vanacker BF. The impact of nitrous oxide on postoperative nausea and vomiting after desflurane anesthesia for breast surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1999;50:77–81. Wagner BKJ, O’Hara DA. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of sevoflurane versus isoflurane anesthesia in elective ambulatory surgery. Pharmacotherapy 1997;17:1006–10. Watcha MF. The cost-effective management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 2000;92:931–3. Watcha MF, White PF. Economics of anesthetic practice. Anesthesiology 1997;86:1170–96. White P, Standley TH, Apfelbaum JL, Grasela TH, Hug CC, McLeskey CH, et al. Effects on Recovery when isoflurane is used to supplement propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1993;77S:S15–20. Whitwam JG. Co-induction of anaesthesia: day-case surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1995;12 Suppl:25–34. Wilhelm W, Gundmann U, Van Asken H, Larsen R. A multicenter comparison of isoflurane and propofol as adjuncts to remifentanil-based anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2000;12:129–35. Wolf AR, Lawson RA, Dryden CM, Davies FW. Recovery after desflurane anaesthesia in the infant: comparison with isoflurane. Br J Anaesth 1996;76:362–4. Wong J, Chung F. Economic evaluation of sevoflurane vs propofol for ambulatory anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1998;45:1141–3. Woodward WM, Barker I, John RE, Peacock JE. Propofol infusion vs thiopentone/isoflurane anaesthesia for prominent ear correction in children. Paediatr Anaesth 1997;7:379–83. 179
Page 1 and 2:
Which anaesthetic agents are costef
Page 3:
Which anaesthetic agents are costef
Page 6 and 7:
NHS R&D HTA Programme The NHS R&D H
Page 8 and 9:
Contents Appendix 6 Adult patient-b
Page 11 and 12:
Background The aim of the project w
Page 13:
• The incidence of PONV was low d
Page 16 and 17:
2 Introduction dizziness or disorie
Page 18 and 19:
4 Introduction a reduced incidence
Page 20 and 21:
6 Introduction willingness to pay f
Page 22 and 23:
8 Literature review included in the
Page 24 and 25:
10 Literature review TABLE 1 Compar
Page 26 and 27:
12 Literature review intermediate a
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
18 Literature review Patient-based
Page 34 and 35:
20 Literature review TABLE 5 contd
Page 36 and 37:
22 Literature review No studies fol
Page 38 and 39:
24 Literature review (30%) and meth
Page 40 and 41:
26 Literature review • There are
Page 42 and 43:
28 National survey of anaesthetic p
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
36 Economic evaluation methods (inc
Page 52 and 53:
38 Economic evaluation methods The
Page 54 and 55:
40 Economic evaluation methods Tabl
Page 56 and 57:
42 Economic evaluation methods simi
Page 58 and 59:
44 Economic evaluation methods Prob
Page 61 and 62:
Recruitment to the CESA RCT The stu
Page 63 and 64:
Clinical outcome data PONV by anaes
Page 65 and 66:
The findings from the logistic regr
Page 67 and 68:
TABLE 29 The length of stay and pri
Page 69 and 70:
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 No. of pa
Page 71 and 72:
250 200 150 100 50 0 No. of patient
Page 73 and 74:
TABLE 37 Deterministic sensitivity
Page 75 and 76:
20 15 10 5 0 -5 Difference in varia
Page 77 and 78:
Patient admitted for day surgery an
Page 79 and 80:
500 400 300 200 100 0 -100 -200 -30
Page 81 and 82:
Recruitment to the CESA RCT The stu
Page 83 and 84:
TABLE 49 The occurrence of any PONV
Page 85 and 86:
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 No. of patients
Page 87 and 88:
a scale effect for scenario A, but
Page 89 and 90:
The mean CVs for avoidance of PONV
Page 91 and 92:
1.80 The new variable cost and tota
Page 93 and 94:
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Su
Page 95 and 96:
The structure and content of this d
Page 97 and 98:
nurses to have an in-depth knowledg
Page 99 and 100:
agent used (see appendix 18). It wa
Page 101 and 102:
Furthermore, anaesthetists operate
Page 103 and 104:
The CESA project was designed to as
Page 105:
practice, such as the use of midazo
Page 109 and 110:
1. Royal College of Surgeons of Eng
Page 111 and 112:
60. Cheng KI, Chu KS, Fang YR, Su K
Page 113 and 114:
112. Raeder J, Gupta A, Pedersen FM
Page 115 and 116:
162. Viitanen H, Baer G, Annila P.
Page 117 and 118:
220. Rosenberg KM, Bridge P, Brown
Page 119 and 120:
The range of databases interrogated
Page 121:
24. preferen$.mp. [mp=title, abstra
Page 124 and 125:
110 Appendix 2 TABLE 65 contd Summa
Page 126 and 127:
112 Appendix 3 Quality assessment o
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143: 128 Appendix 4 TABLE 66 contd Summa
Page 173 and 174: TABLE 69 Summary of paediatric pati
Page 175 and 176: TABLE 69 contd Summary of paediatri
Page 177 and 178: TABLE 70 Characteristics of cost or
Page 179 and 180: TABLE 71 Quality of cost or economi
Page 181 and 182: TABLE 71 contd Quality of cost or e
Page 189 and 190: Abbott J, Abbott P. Psychological a
Page 191: Hall JE, Stewart JIM, Harmer M. Sin
Page 196 and 197: 182 Appendix 11
Page 205 and 206: The aim of this study was to develo
Page 207 and 208: anaesthetics in day surgery, using
Page 209: © Queen’s Printer and Controller
Page 213 and 214: Background The empirical study quan
Page 215 and 216: Satisfaction with care Nearly all (
Page 217 and 218: TABLE 76 Reason given for preferenc
Page 219 and 220: TABLE 79 Comparisons with previous
Page 221 and 222: TABLE 80 Reason given for preferenc
Page 223 and 224: TABLE 81 Reason given for willingne
Page 225 and 226: Background Variable costs account f
Page 227 and 228: TABLE 85 Unit costs for the purchas
Page 229 and 230: Background The empirical study requ
Page 231 and 232: Ethical approval This was covered b
Page 233 and 234: 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 True weight
Page 235: 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 True weight - Dion
Page 238 and 239: 224 Appendix 19 • patients aged o
Page 241 and 242: All staff unit costs were for the y
Page 243:
Background Fixed costs account for
Page 246 and 247:
232 Appendix 22 March, Tuesday 15 A
Page 248 and 249:
234 Appendix 23 TABLE 96 Reasons fo
Page 251 and 252:
Patients were coded using the OPCS
Page 253 and 254:
Q03.4 punch biopsy of cervix Q03.5
Page 255 and 256:
This section displays the associati
Page 257 and 258:
given in Table 103 confirm the age
Page 259:
TABLE 107 Occurrence of PONV by dur
Page 262 and 263:
248 Appendix 27 TABLE 113 Frequency
Page 265 and 266:
This section displays the associati
Page 267 and 268:
The adverse events observed in the
Page 269 and 270:
262 Health Technology Assessment Pr
Page 271:
264 Health Technology Assessment Pr
show all

Aanesthetic Agents for Day Surgery - NIHR Health Technology ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?