10.06.2013 Views

vector 2_1.cdr - Universitatea de Arte "George Enescu"

vector 2_1.cdr - Universitatea de Arte "George Enescu"

vector 2_1.cdr - Universitatea de Arte "George Enescu"

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

uilding contexts_networking contexts<br />

32<br />

Kiev, Ukraine:<br />

Creating Context for Contemporary Art<br />

Tamara ZLOBINA<br />

The reflection on the<br />

specific Ukrainian situation<br />

showed that for the new<br />

generation of intellectuals<br />

the thesis “private is<br />

political” is fully<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstandable. Political<br />

doesn't mean repressive<br />

and totalitarian any more.<br />

However “public” looks<br />

political and constructed by<br />

culture; “private” looks<br />

constructed by public and<br />

political. Contemporary art<br />

became a political and<br />

commercial project and<br />

pretends to be an actor in<br />

public sphere.<br />

Tamara Zlobina is an art critic<br />

and curator, working in Kiev<br />

and living in different cities<br />

(Kiev, Lviv, Kamenec-<br />

Podilskyj), Ukraine. She has<br />

<strong>de</strong>grees in Art History, and<br />

Cultural Studies, and she is a<br />

PhD candidate in Philosophy at<br />

National Institute for Strategic<br />

Studies. During 2006 she<br />

worked as curator-resi<strong>de</strong>nt in<br />

Center for Contemporary Art<br />

(Kiev), using different<br />

nicknames - SCC139, CSC139,<br />

CCS139.<br />

On September 8, 2006, an exhibition was opened in the Center for<br />

Contemporary Art from Kiev. The title Private with Public pretends to discover<br />

some critical issues about new forms of civil activities in Ukraine. Political<br />

organization of life as well as structure of artistic institutions became core topics<br />

of the exhibition.<br />

Contemporary art functions as critical strategy rather rarely in Ukraine.<br />

National state building <strong>de</strong>mands for legitimizing sources. History, traditions,<br />

fine arts and literature are used as such. I<strong>de</strong>ology creates some canons and<br />

fixes it in reproducing practices and celebrations. Contemporary art is caught in<br />

this situation. From one si<strong>de</strong> it became a space for official statements (in case of<br />

governmental organizations like National Artists Union), from other completely<br />

business project (in commercial galleries). There are no other actors in<br />

Ukrainian contemporary art except of private initiatives and local artistic<br />

networks which function as educational and critical sites for their participants.<br />

Resi<strong>de</strong>nce program in Kiev's Center for Contemporary Art is offering one<br />

of the few possibilities for young artists to take some experience in cooperating<br />

with curators and one another. In August 2006 the resi<strong>de</strong>ncy program brought<br />

together four Ukrainian and three foreign artists. Iwona Golebiewska (PL),<br />

Ingela Johansson (SE), Zhanna Kadyrova (UA), Olena Karasyuk (UA), Lesya<br />

Khomenko (UA), Mykola Ridnyj (UA), Inga Zimprich (DE/NL) worked together<br />

and with invited guests other artists and curators. The title “private with public”<br />

appeared on the very beginning as an intellectual provocation from curator<br />

CSC139. Such an extraordinarily wi<strong>de</strong> topic was chosen by CSC139 (a person<br />

who has cultural studies education) to trace multilevel changes in this<br />

phenomenon in contemporary Ukraine. Un<strong>de</strong>r Soviet regime the notion of<br />

"private" existed as sole free site in daily life. Famous "kitchen talks" were the<br />

place for communicating and exchanging un-official thoughts. The new notions<br />

of private appeared in public discourse after the fall of Soviet Union. Feminist's<br />

statement "private is political" became more un<strong>de</strong>rstandable with the<br />

commercialization of culture. Consumer and advertising strategies influence all<br />

aspects of life. They question the i<strong>de</strong>a that every event in personal life is "really<br />

private business". Public sphere in Ukraine got un<strong>de</strong>r attack of "wild<br />

<strong>de</strong>mocracy" during election companies 2004-2006. Political marketing have<br />

been a remarkable part of daily life and cityscape for two years. All these<br />

private-political-public issues created the background for the project realized in<br />

CCA. Each artist had the possibility to discover it from a personal point of view<br />

but a month of cooperation shifted accent from the topic itself to the functioning<br />

of contemporary art sphere in Ukraine.<br />

The situation of a permanent communication between different<br />

professionals artists, curators, CCA staff and visitors provoked open form of<br />

working process. Resi<strong>de</strong>nts began their common work with Kitchen project<br />

series of presentations for each other and visitors <strong>de</strong>veloped into Open<br />

Laboratory. It functioned as a mini-school, series of lectures and presentations<br />

during August 2006. Elaboration of "open work process" and "collaboration"<br />

issues resulted in i<strong>de</strong>a of Center for Communication and Context experimental<br />

modification of CCA structure for the period of the final exhibition.<br />

Finally the exhibition Private with Public was opened. One could recognize<br />

few trends in project's space: explanation of Center for Communication and<br />

Context and of its spatial structure; documentation of private-public creative<br />

process; discussion between art works of resi<strong>de</strong>nts <strong>de</strong>voted to "private with<br />

public" subject-matter. The suggestion of a new format for CCA focused attention<br />

on the context of producing and <strong>de</strong>monstration of art and communication with<br />

audience. According to the i<strong>de</strong>a of the Center for Communication and Context,<br />

Kyiv (www.ccc-k.net), exhibition space was divi<strong>de</strong>d into red, green and yellow<br />

zones. Red zone was <strong>de</strong>dicated to the context of contemporary art in Ukraine.<br />

Inga Zimprich and Ingela Johansson created media installations by interviews<br />

with main persons in Ukrainian contemporary art. Three monitors showed<br />

fragments of conversations with current director Yuliya Vaganova, the former<br />

director of CCA Jerzy Onuch and the director of new PinchukArtCenter Alexan<strong>de</strong>r<br />

Soloviov. In conversations one could recognize functioning and financing issues<br />

of contemporary art in Ukraine (especially post-grant / post-Soros and political<br />

motives). The same questions were brought up on walls in posters with<br />

quotations like "you can coordinate program of resi<strong>de</strong>nce for young artists even<br />

from you personal apartment" or "one can organize a Center for Contemporary<br />

Art even in Sahara". Simple form of installation ma<strong>de</strong> by foreign artists opened<br />

all set of problems in this milieu: post-soviet educational schemes; an absence of<br />

art criticism; indifferent audience; absence or backwardness of institution,<br />

progressive commercialization of art etc.<br />

Green zone consisted of three elements bulletin board, lecture room and<br />

small exhibition space Contact. This is a project space for young artists with<br />

dynamic time schedule, curated by participants of Private with Public. Young<br />

artists were invited to use the space in CCCK to make quick works. Main i<strong>de</strong>a was<br />

to stress that an institution needs flexible spaces used in many different ways, to<br />

stay interesting for the public but also keep its function as a platform for young<br />

people to experiment.<br />

Contact began functioning synchronously with “Private with Public” and<br />

presented few projects and presentations: Volodymyr Kuznecov's mural<br />

paintings Full contact, group project Psya Krew Graffiti in Focus; lecture of<br />

Alevtina Kakhidze, presentations of internet-sources www.sekcja.org (Polish art<br />

magazine) and on-line gallery http://www.artinua.com, Mykola Masenko's and<br />

Anatolij Byelov's projects.<br />

Contact activities were a logical continuation of Kitchen and Open<br />

Laboratory projects. All working materials (intermediate conceptions,<br />

reflections, vi<strong>de</strong>otape recordings of conversations etc.) were preserved and<br />

presented as part of the exhibition in lecture room. The announcement board<br />

was also an interesting part of the project (http://www.thinktank.nl/ccck/posters.html).<br />

Artists use CCA announcement board facing<br />

Kontraktova Square as interface for announcements of the current program.<br />

Posters were ma<strong>de</strong> on the printer and copy-machine. It is also possible to create<br />

text- or image-based works which can be printed on A4 and glued outsi<strong>de</strong> as a<br />

direct communication with people on the street.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!