- Page 1 and 2:
EFFECT OF INFECTION OF THE FILARIAL
- Page 4 and 5:
I wish to express my deep sense of
- Page 6:
1. INTRODUCTlON 2. REVIEW OF LlTERA
- Page 9 and 10:
As stated earlier, the host immune
- Page 11 and 12:
13 Testicular changes Testosterone
- Page 14 and 15:
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE Filariasis
- Page 16 and 17:
2.2 Clinical signs Inflammalation o
- Page 18 and 19:
the tegument by the release of thei
- Page 20 and 21:
the compound kills the filarial wor
- Page 22:
3. MATERIALS AND METHODS COLONY MAI
- Page 25 and 26:
Ragenb 1. Tris-HCI buffer . : 0.1 M
- Page 27 and 28:
3. Reduced glutathione : 30 mM To I
- Page 29 and 30:
4.1.1.6 Glucose-6-phosphate dehydro
- Page 31 and 32:
absorbance of the clear supernatant
- Page 33 and 34:
-eats I. Lowry's reagent :Solution
- Page 35 and 36:
4.1.2.1 Changes in antioxidant enzy
- Page 37 and 38:
Fig.3: Effect of B.malayi on SOD in
- Page 39 and 40:
Fig.9: Effect of B.rnalayi on GST i
- Page 41 and 42:
Fig.12: Effect of 6.rnalayi on GPx
- Page 43 and 44:
Fig. 18: Effect of B.malayi on G6PD
- Page 45 and 46:
12- 3 m- 15- lor, Fig.21: Effect of
- Page 47 and 48:
Fig.27: Effect of B.malayi on Ascor
- Page 49 and 50:
4.1.2.3 Change in the antioxidant e
- Page 51 and 52:
Fig.35: Effect of B.malayi on CAT i
- Page 53 and 54:
m 20 0) - 15 9 g 10 il! 5 0 Fig.39:
- Page 55 and 56:
30 25 8 - a 20 2 15 C I 10 I 5 0 35
- Page 57 and 58:
Fig.45: Effect of B.maiayi on GSH i
- Page 59 and 60:
Fig.49: Effect of B.malayi on Vit-C
- Page 61 and 62:
4.1.3 DISCUSSION 4.1 3.1.1 Toxic ox
- Page 63 and 64:
1973). The two major systems of LPO
- Page 65 and 66:
1981), and their increase in human
- Page 67 and 68:
1 0 Fig.58:Relationship between cha
- Page 69 and 70:
1 - 0- ' 1 5 - 6 - 7 - Fig.63:Relat
- Page 71 and 72:
Catalase had been reported to be re
- Page 73 and 74:
- Fig.68:Relationship between chang
- Page 75 and 76:
esults in its reduced activity (Con
- Page 77 and 78:
g 20- :I-. F1g.70:Relationship betw
- Page 79 and 80:
12, - I 0 U) Q 4 2 0 - + - Fig.75:R
- Page 81 and 82:
$ Fig.80:Relationship between chang
- Page 83 and 84:
Fig.85:Relationship between change
- Page 85 and 86:
V) (3 :; - Fig.9O:Relationship betw
- Page 87 and 88:
A reduction in the total thiol cont
- Page 89 and 90:
2 5- Fig.98:Relationship between ch
- Page 91 and 92:
Fig. 103:Relationship between chang
- Page 93 and 94:
4.2.1.1 N ay ATPase Reagents Nay AT
- Page 95 and 96:
Reagents 1. Acetylcholine bromide :
- Page 97 and 98:
To 1.5 ml of carbonate buffer, 1.5
- Page 99 and 100:
4.2.1.10 Differential leucocyte cou
- Page 101 and 102:
increase in the control animals (Fi
- Page 103 and 104:
- Fig.110: Effect of 6. malayi on H
- Page 105 and 106:
efflux and thereby alter the membra
- Page 107 and 108:
with i n d lymphocytes and decrease
- Page 109 and 110: Tubes were labeled for calibrators,
- Page 111 and 112: Fig.114: Effect of B, malayi on GTP
- Page 113 and 114: 433 DISCUSSION Testosterone is a se
- Page 115 and 116: CHAPTER 4.4 HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CHANG
- Page 117 and 118: Platc 2 Plate 3 Plate 4 Plate 5 Pla
- Page 119 and 120: Platc X Plate 9 Plate 10 Plate 11 P
- Page 121 and 122: Plate w: Section of Testes of norma
- Page 123 and 124: 4.4.2.1.5 Brain The control animals
- Page 126 and 127: Plate ICt Section of Kidney of infe
- Page 128 and 129: 4.4.2.2 Histopathological changes i
- Page 130 and 131: Plate 32
- Page 132: The mf could not be seen in spleen
- Page 135 and 136: ain, it decreased from 0 day itself
- Page 137: inflammatory nature indicative of c
- Page 141 and 142: BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerman, S.J., Gleich
- Page 143 and 144: Case, T., Leis, B., Witte, M., Way,
- Page 145 and 146: Drabkin, D.L.R. and Austin, J.H. (1
- Page 147 and 148: Fukuota, M., Zhou, Y. and Tanaka.(l
- Page 149 and 150: Jacob, H.S. and Lux, S.E. (1968). D
- Page 151 and 152: Linda, I. and Mayeda, B. (1974). Th
- Page 153 and 154: Murray, H.W. (1981). Susceptibility
- Page 155 and 156: Santiago- Stevenson, D., Oliver-Gon
- Page 157 and 158: Tate, S.S., Thomson, G.A. and Meist
- Page 159: Zaini, M., Ramachandran, C.P. and E