25.06.2013 Views

private and public use of the living room - Bilkent University

private and public use of the living room - Bilkent University

private and public use of the living room - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Benjamin (1995) states that <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> home ga<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>the</strong> physical <strong>and</strong> mental<br />

environment with <strong>the</strong> conceptual space <strong>of</strong> domestic family life. Rybczynski (1987)<br />

claims that <strong>the</strong> dwelling stays as a machine, not as a home unless <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong><br />

comfort which is <strong>the</strong> fundamental notion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> domestic well being is not<br />

recognized. Based on “<strong>the</strong> Onion Theory <strong>of</strong> Comfort”, Rybczynski (1987) claims that<br />

<strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> comfort developed historically without missing <strong>the</strong> past meanings <strong>and</strong><br />

“…each new meaning added a layer to <strong>the</strong> previous meanings, which were<br />

preserved beneath. At any particular time, comfort consists <strong>of</strong> all layers, not only<br />

<strong>the</strong> most recent” (p. 231). When describing <strong>the</strong> whole idea, separating those layers<br />

makes <strong>the</strong> whole concept disappear. It is claimed that although <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong><br />

home can be described by its parts <strong>and</strong> its whole, it is possible to miss <strong>the</strong> whole<br />

sight (Moore, 2000).<br />

The philosophical <strong>and</strong> phenomenological context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> home is examined by <strong>the</strong><br />

studies that question <strong>the</strong> relationship between place <strong>and</strong> dwelling. For example,<br />

Bachelard (1969) claims that “… it is not enough to consider <strong>the</strong> ho<strong>use</strong> as an<br />

“object” on which we can make our judgments <strong>and</strong> daydreams react” (p. 3), “…our<br />

ho<strong>use</strong> is our corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world” (p. 4). As a result, more “spiritual <strong>and</strong> existential”<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> home are examined in a “conceptual <strong>and</strong> symbolic<br />

approach” (p. 209). Those studies inspired psychologists to consider <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong><br />

place <strong>and</strong> home. Since those studies are conducted by environmental psychologists,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are unable to cite <strong>and</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>the</strong> symbolic <strong>and</strong> conceptual approaches in a critical<br />

way (Moore, 2000).<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!